Freedom, interference and domination

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interference and domination make persons less free. This paper discusses how they do so. It considers and rejects two influential recent accounts of freedom, one that holds that freedom is best understood in terms of non-interference and one that holds that freedom is best understood in terms of non-domination. Against these accounts, the paper argues that both interference and domination play an important role in reducing freedom and that neither concept can be reduced to the other. To bolster this argument, the paper presents and defends an account of freedom that relates both concepts back to a common source. This account shows that while interference and domination have independent significance for judgments of freedom both reduce freedom by obstructing the ability of persons to plan their lives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-230
Number of pages15
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume49
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

domination
interference
human being
ability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Freedom, interference and domination. / Wall, Steven P.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 49, No. 2, 06.2001, p. 216-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wall, SP 2001, 'Freedom, interference and domination', Political Studies, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 216-230.
Wall, Steven P. / Freedom, interference and domination. In: Political Studies. 2001 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 216-230.
@article{7fd4a49d42294fe3b9444229065a030d,
title = "Freedom, interference and domination",
abstract = "Interference and domination make persons less free. This paper discusses how they do so. It considers and rejects two influential recent accounts of freedom, one that holds that freedom is best understood in terms of non-interference and one that holds that freedom is best understood in terms of non-domination. Against these accounts, the paper argues that both interference and domination play an important role in reducing freedom and that neither concept can be reduced to the other. To bolster this argument, the paper presents and defends an account of freedom that relates both concepts back to a common source. This account shows that while interference and domination have independent significance for judgments of freedom both reduce freedom by obstructing the ability of persons to plan their lives.",
author = "Wall, {Steven P}",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "216--230",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Freedom, interference and domination

AU - Wall, Steven P

PY - 2001/6

Y1 - 2001/6

N2 - Interference and domination make persons less free. This paper discusses how they do so. It considers and rejects two influential recent accounts of freedom, one that holds that freedom is best understood in terms of non-interference and one that holds that freedom is best understood in terms of non-domination. Against these accounts, the paper argues that both interference and domination play an important role in reducing freedom and that neither concept can be reduced to the other. To bolster this argument, the paper presents and defends an account of freedom that relates both concepts back to a common source. This account shows that while interference and domination have independent significance for judgments of freedom both reduce freedom by obstructing the ability of persons to plan their lives.

AB - Interference and domination make persons less free. This paper discusses how they do so. It considers and rejects two influential recent accounts of freedom, one that holds that freedom is best understood in terms of non-interference and one that holds that freedom is best understood in terms of non-domination. Against these accounts, the paper argues that both interference and domination play an important role in reducing freedom and that neither concept can be reduced to the other. To bolster this argument, the paper presents and defends an account of freedom that relates both concepts back to a common source. This account shows that while interference and domination have independent significance for judgments of freedom both reduce freedom by obstructing the ability of persons to plan their lives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035373643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035373643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 216

EP - 230

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 2

ER -