Functional Anatomy of the Forelimb Muscles of the Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis)

Emily Julik, Shawn P Zack, Brent Adrian, Saaiqa Maredia, Arman Parsa, Meifawn Poole, Adam Starbuck, Rebecca E Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The myology of most members of the cat family (Felidae) is poorly documented. This study describes the forelimb myology of the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and compares the forelimb anatomy of the ocelot to that of other well-documented felids (Felis catus, Panthera leo). A substantial number of myological features vary among the three species and are distributed in a manner consistent with major ecomorphological variables (prey size preference and locomotor repertoire). The origin of m. triceps brachii caput longum is most extensive in Panthera leo, consistent with the fact that this species pursues prey over greater distances compared to F. catus or L. pardalis. In addition, the origins and insertions of the pronator and supinator musculature are reduced in Felis catus, which has little need to supinate during locomotion or prey capture. Furthermore, muscles serving the digits are best developed in the lion and ocelot, both of which make greater use of the forelimb for grasping and manipulation than does the domestic cat. However, while the lion probably retains the primitive morphology for the family, the ocelot shows evidence of secondary adaptation to increased mobility of the digits. Overall, results indicate that additional studies of felid forelimb myology are warranted, as they are likely to provide valuable functional insights.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-304
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Mammalian Evolution
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Leopardus pardalis
felid
forelimbs
anatomy
muscle
Felidae
Panthera leo
muscles
prey capture
prey size
locomotion
cats
family

Keywords

  • Ecomorphology
  • Felidae
  • Forelimb
  • Myology
  • Ocelot

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Functional Anatomy of the Forelimb Muscles of the Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis). / Julik, Emily; Zack, Shawn P; Adrian, Brent; Maredia, Saaiqa; Parsa, Arman; Poole, Meifawn; Starbuck, Adam; Fisher, Rebecca E.

In: Journal of Mammalian Evolution, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2012, p. 277-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Julik, Emily ; Zack, Shawn P ; Adrian, Brent ; Maredia, Saaiqa ; Parsa, Arman ; Poole, Meifawn ; Starbuck, Adam ; Fisher, Rebecca E. / Functional Anatomy of the Forelimb Muscles of the Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis). In: Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 277-304.
@article{6ef14d25928147cfb10d0e284f61bea6,
title = "Functional Anatomy of the Forelimb Muscles of the Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis)",
abstract = "The myology of most members of the cat family (Felidae) is poorly documented. This study describes the forelimb myology of the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and compares the forelimb anatomy of the ocelot to that of other well-documented felids (Felis catus, Panthera leo). A substantial number of myological features vary among the three species and are distributed in a manner consistent with major ecomorphological variables (prey size preference and locomotor repertoire). The origin of m. triceps brachii caput longum is most extensive in Panthera leo, consistent with the fact that this species pursues prey over greater distances compared to F. catus or L. pardalis. In addition, the origins and insertions of the pronator and supinator musculature are reduced in Felis catus, which has little need to supinate during locomotion or prey capture. Furthermore, muscles serving the digits are best developed in the lion and ocelot, both of which make greater use of the forelimb for grasping and manipulation than does the domestic cat. However, while the lion probably retains the primitive morphology for the family, the ocelot shows evidence of secondary adaptation to increased mobility of the digits. Overall, results indicate that additional studies of felid forelimb myology are warranted, as they are likely to provide valuable functional insights.",
keywords = "Ecomorphology, Felidae, Forelimb, Myology, Ocelot",
author = "Emily Julik and Zack, {Shawn P} and Brent Adrian and Saaiqa Maredia and Arman Parsa and Meifawn Poole and Adam Starbuck and Fisher, {Rebecca E}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s10914-012-9191-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "277--304",
journal = "Journal of Mammalian Evolution",
issn = "1064-7554",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional Anatomy of the Forelimb Muscles of the Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis)

AU - Julik, Emily

AU - Zack, Shawn P

AU - Adrian, Brent

AU - Maredia, Saaiqa

AU - Parsa, Arman

AU - Poole, Meifawn

AU - Starbuck, Adam

AU - Fisher, Rebecca E

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The myology of most members of the cat family (Felidae) is poorly documented. This study describes the forelimb myology of the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and compares the forelimb anatomy of the ocelot to that of other well-documented felids (Felis catus, Panthera leo). A substantial number of myological features vary among the three species and are distributed in a manner consistent with major ecomorphological variables (prey size preference and locomotor repertoire). The origin of m. triceps brachii caput longum is most extensive in Panthera leo, consistent with the fact that this species pursues prey over greater distances compared to F. catus or L. pardalis. In addition, the origins and insertions of the pronator and supinator musculature are reduced in Felis catus, which has little need to supinate during locomotion or prey capture. Furthermore, muscles serving the digits are best developed in the lion and ocelot, both of which make greater use of the forelimb for grasping and manipulation than does the domestic cat. However, while the lion probably retains the primitive morphology for the family, the ocelot shows evidence of secondary adaptation to increased mobility of the digits. Overall, results indicate that additional studies of felid forelimb myology are warranted, as they are likely to provide valuable functional insights.

AB - The myology of most members of the cat family (Felidae) is poorly documented. This study describes the forelimb myology of the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and compares the forelimb anatomy of the ocelot to that of other well-documented felids (Felis catus, Panthera leo). A substantial number of myological features vary among the three species and are distributed in a manner consistent with major ecomorphological variables (prey size preference and locomotor repertoire). The origin of m. triceps brachii caput longum is most extensive in Panthera leo, consistent with the fact that this species pursues prey over greater distances compared to F. catus or L. pardalis. In addition, the origins and insertions of the pronator and supinator musculature are reduced in Felis catus, which has little need to supinate during locomotion or prey capture. Furthermore, muscles serving the digits are best developed in the lion and ocelot, both of which make greater use of the forelimb for grasping and manipulation than does the domestic cat. However, while the lion probably retains the primitive morphology for the family, the ocelot shows evidence of secondary adaptation to increased mobility of the digits. Overall, results indicate that additional studies of felid forelimb myology are warranted, as they are likely to provide valuable functional insights.

KW - Ecomorphology

KW - Felidae

KW - Forelimb

KW - Myology

KW - Ocelot

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873290532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873290532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10914-012-9191-4

DO - 10.1007/s10914-012-9191-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873290532

VL - 19

SP - 277

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Mammalian Evolution

JF - Journal of Mammalian Evolution

SN - 1064-7554

IS - 4

ER -