Fuse or fracture? Threat as a moderator of the effects of diversity faultlines in teams

Trevor M. Spoelma, Aleksander P J Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While faultlines theory has received quite a bit of attention in the literature, there has been some inconsistency in findings regarding identity and information faultlines. Namely, identity faultlines do not always result in harmful social categorizations and information faultlines do not always increase information-processing capabilities. However, according to the categorization-elaboration model (CEM; van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004), any category of diversity can result in categorization processes and intergroup bias. One key to understanding faultlines, therefore, lies in context-specific predictions. Building on this idea, we apply the CEM as an explanatory framework and examine threat as a contextual moderator of identity and information faultlines. We propose that threat mitigates the negative effects of activated identity faultlines on team creativity: an effect mediated by team psychological safety. In contrast, we propose that threat aggravates the negative effects of information faultlines on team decision-making: an effect mediated by status conflict. We test our hypotheses with 2 experiments and 184 teams, finding support for our predictions regarding identity faultlines and partial support for our predictions regarding information faultlines. Taken together, this study demonstrates the utility of the CEM for faultlines research, identifies an important boundary condition of the effects of identity and information faultlines, and challenges the notion that threat is always "bad" for teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1344-1359
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume102
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Creativity
Automatic Data Processing
Decision Making
Psychology
Safety
Research
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Creativity
  • Decision-making
  • Faultlines
  • Threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Fuse or fracture? Threat as a moderator of the effects of diversity faultlines in teams. / Spoelma, Trevor M.; Ellis, Aleksander P J.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 1344-1359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ebb41a9c9a7647168c6f627102eed16d,
title = "Fuse or fracture? Threat as a moderator of the effects of diversity faultlines in teams",
abstract = "While faultlines theory has received quite a bit of attention in the literature, there has been some inconsistency in findings regarding identity and information faultlines. Namely, identity faultlines do not always result in harmful social categorizations and information faultlines do not always increase information-processing capabilities. However, according to the categorization-elaboration model (CEM; van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004), any category of diversity can result in categorization processes and intergroup bias. One key to understanding faultlines, therefore, lies in context-specific predictions. Building on this idea, we apply the CEM as an explanatory framework and examine threat as a contextual moderator of identity and information faultlines. We propose that threat mitigates the negative effects of activated identity faultlines on team creativity: an effect mediated by team psychological safety. In contrast, we propose that threat aggravates the negative effects of information faultlines on team decision-making: an effect mediated by status conflict. We test our hypotheses with 2 experiments and 184 teams, finding support for our predictions regarding identity faultlines and partial support for our predictions regarding information faultlines. Taken together, this study demonstrates the utility of the CEM for faultlines research, identifies an important boundary condition of the effects of identity and information faultlines, and challenges the notion that threat is always {"}bad{"} for teams.",
keywords = "Creativity, Decision-making, Faultlines, Threat",
author = "Spoelma, {Trevor M.} and Ellis, {Aleksander P J}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/apl0000231",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1344--1359",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fuse or fracture? Threat as a moderator of the effects of diversity faultlines in teams

AU - Spoelma, Trevor M.

AU - Ellis, Aleksander P J

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - While faultlines theory has received quite a bit of attention in the literature, there has been some inconsistency in findings regarding identity and information faultlines. Namely, identity faultlines do not always result in harmful social categorizations and information faultlines do not always increase information-processing capabilities. However, according to the categorization-elaboration model (CEM; van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004), any category of diversity can result in categorization processes and intergroup bias. One key to understanding faultlines, therefore, lies in context-specific predictions. Building on this idea, we apply the CEM as an explanatory framework and examine threat as a contextual moderator of identity and information faultlines. We propose that threat mitigates the negative effects of activated identity faultlines on team creativity: an effect mediated by team psychological safety. In contrast, we propose that threat aggravates the negative effects of information faultlines on team decision-making: an effect mediated by status conflict. We test our hypotheses with 2 experiments and 184 teams, finding support for our predictions regarding identity faultlines and partial support for our predictions regarding information faultlines. Taken together, this study demonstrates the utility of the CEM for faultlines research, identifies an important boundary condition of the effects of identity and information faultlines, and challenges the notion that threat is always "bad" for teams.

AB - While faultlines theory has received quite a bit of attention in the literature, there has been some inconsistency in findings regarding identity and information faultlines. Namely, identity faultlines do not always result in harmful social categorizations and information faultlines do not always increase information-processing capabilities. However, according to the categorization-elaboration model (CEM; van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004), any category of diversity can result in categorization processes and intergroup bias. One key to understanding faultlines, therefore, lies in context-specific predictions. Building on this idea, we apply the CEM as an explanatory framework and examine threat as a contextual moderator of identity and information faultlines. We propose that threat mitigates the negative effects of activated identity faultlines on team creativity: an effect mediated by team psychological safety. In contrast, we propose that threat aggravates the negative effects of information faultlines on team decision-making: an effect mediated by status conflict. We test our hypotheses with 2 experiments and 184 teams, finding support for our predictions regarding identity faultlines and partial support for our predictions regarding information faultlines. Taken together, this study demonstrates the utility of the CEM for faultlines research, identifies an important boundary condition of the effects of identity and information faultlines, and challenges the notion that threat is always "bad" for teams.

KW - Creativity

KW - Decision-making

KW - Faultlines

KW - Threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021716969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021716969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/apl0000231

DO - 10.1037/apl0000231

M3 - Article

C2 - 28447831

AN - SCOPUS:85021716969

VL - 102

SP - 1344

EP - 1359

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 9

ER -