Galician geada: In defense of underspecification in Optimality Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In Galician geada a voiced velar fricative or approximant surfaces as a voiceless fricative in all contexts except post-nasally, e.g., pega [péxa] 'magpie' (non-geada dialects [péγ{phonetic}a]) vs. longo [ló{eng}go] 'long'. Although geada seems to be a rather basic phonological problem, existing analyses are complex. This paper shows that the analysis becomes quite straightforward once the connection of geada with voiced obstruent alternations is recognized. The proposed account obviates the need to resort to controversial mechanisms such as constraint conjunction and sheds light into the allophonic realizations of voiced obstruents. One crucial aspect of voiced obstruent allophones in Galician is their predictability and their underspecification for continuancy. Underspecification is argued to be compatible with Optimality Theory, as long as the underspecified input is not stipulated, but derived from the constraints and constraint ranking. In Galician the phonological system reveals the need for a three-way contrast in obstruents: [-continuant], [+continuant] and underspecified [continuant]. The findings about voiced obstruents have consequences for NC heterosyllabic clusters, showing that there is no voicing requirement at stake, rather a continuancy one, according to which voiced obstruents must be [-continuant] after nasals. Only voiced obstruents agree in continuancy with nasals, because only voiced obstruents are underspecified for continuancy. Constraint reranking accounts for dialectal variation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-100
Number of pages17
JournalLingua
Volume133
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

dialect
phonetics
ranking
Optimality Theory
Obstruents
Underspecification
Continuant
Nasal
Voicing
Voiceless Fricatives
Predictability
Velar Fricative
Dialectal Variation
Alternation
Ranking
Allophone

Keywords

  • Galician
  • Geada
  • Optimality Theory
  • Underspecification
  • Voiced obstruent
  • Voiced velar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Galician geada : In defense of underspecification in Optimality Theory. / Colina, Sonia -.

In: Lingua, Vol. 133, 2013, p. 84-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0992bae3bb1a4e4fa320d449b83e53fe,
title = "Galician geada: In defense of underspecification in Optimality Theory",
abstract = "In Galician geada a voiced velar fricative or approximant surfaces as a voiceless fricative in all contexts except post-nasally, e.g., pega [p{\'e}xa] 'magpie' (non-geada dialects [p{\'e}γ{phonetic}a]) vs. longo [l{\'o}{eng}go] 'long'. Although geada seems to be a rather basic phonological problem, existing analyses are complex. This paper shows that the analysis becomes quite straightforward once the connection of geada with voiced obstruent alternations is recognized. The proposed account obviates the need to resort to controversial mechanisms such as constraint conjunction and sheds light into the allophonic realizations of voiced obstruents. One crucial aspect of voiced obstruent allophones in Galician is their predictability and their underspecification for continuancy. Underspecification is argued to be compatible with Optimality Theory, as long as the underspecified input is not stipulated, but derived from the constraints and constraint ranking. In Galician the phonological system reveals the need for a three-way contrast in obstruents: [-continuant], [+continuant] and underspecified [continuant]. The findings about voiced obstruents have consequences for NC heterosyllabic clusters, showing that there is no voicing requirement at stake, rather a continuancy one, according to which voiced obstruents must be [-continuant] after nasals. Only voiced obstruents agree in continuancy with nasals, because only voiced obstruents are underspecified for continuancy. Constraint reranking accounts for dialectal variation.",
keywords = "Galician, Geada, Optimality Theory, Underspecification, Voiced obstruent, Voiced velar",
author = "Colina, {Sonia -}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.lingua.2013.04.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "133",
pages = "84--100",
journal = "Lingua",
issn = "0024-3841",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Galician geada

T2 - In defense of underspecification in Optimality Theory

AU - Colina, Sonia -

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In Galician geada a voiced velar fricative or approximant surfaces as a voiceless fricative in all contexts except post-nasally, e.g., pega [péxa] 'magpie' (non-geada dialects [péγ{phonetic}a]) vs. longo [ló{eng}go] 'long'. Although geada seems to be a rather basic phonological problem, existing analyses are complex. This paper shows that the analysis becomes quite straightforward once the connection of geada with voiced obstruent alternations is recognized. The proposed account obviates the need to resort to controversial mechanisms such as constraint conjunction and sheds light into the allophonic realizations of voiced obstruents. One crucial aspect of voiced obstruent allophones in Galician is their predictability and their underspecification for continuancy. Underspecification is argued to be compatible with Optimality Theory, as long as the underspecified input is not stipulated, but derived from the constraints and constraint ranking. In Galician the phonological system reveals the need for a three-way contrast in obstruents: [-continuant], [+continuant] and underspecified [continuant]. The findings about voiced obstruents have consequences for NC heterosyllabic clusters, showing that there is no voicing requirement at stake, rather a continuancy one, according to which voiced obstruents must be [-continuant] after nasals. Only voiced obstruents agree in continuancy with nasals, because only voiced obstruents are underspecified for continuancy. Constraint reranking accounts for dialectal variation.

AB - In Galician geada a voiced velar fricative or approximant surfaces as a voiceless fricative in all contexts except post-nasally, e.g., pega [péxa] 'magpie' (non-geada dialects [péγ{phonetic}a]) vs. longo [ló{eng}go] 'long'. Although geada seems to be a rather basic phonological problem, existing analyses are complex. This paper shows that the analysis becomes quite straightforward once the connection of geada with voiced obstruent alternations is recognized. The proposed account obviates the need to resort to controversial mechanisms such as constraint conjunction and sheds light into the allophonic realizations of voiced obstruents. One crucial aspect of voiced obstruent allophones in Galician is their predictability and their underspecification for continuancy. Underspecification is argued to be compatible with Optimality Theory, as long as the underspecified input is not stipulated, but derived from the constraints and constraint ranking. In Galician the phonological system reveals the need for a three-way contrast in obstruents: [-continuant], [+continuant] and underspecified [continuant]. The findings about voiced obstruents have consequences for NC heterosyllabic clusters, showing that there is no voicing requirement at stake, rather a continuancy one, according to which voiced obstruents must be [-continuant] after nasals. Only voiced obstruents agree in continuancy with nasals, because only voiced obstruents are underspecified for continuancy. Constraint reranking accounts for dialectal variation.

KW - Galician

KW - Geada

KW - Optimality Theory

KW - Underspecification

KW - Voiced obstruent

KW - Voiced velar

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878860257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878860257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.04.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878860257

VL - 133

SP - 84

EP - 100

JO - Lingua

JF - Lingua

SN - 0024-3841

ER -