Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature

C. M. Fauquet, R. W. Briddon, Judith K Brown, E. Moriones, J. Stanley, M. Zerbini, X. Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

458 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Geminivirus taxonomy and nomenclature is growing in complexity with the number of genomic sequences deposited in sequence databases. Taxonomic and nomenclatural updates are published at regular intervals (Fauquet et al. in Arch Virol 145:1743-1761, 2000, Arch Virol 148:405-421, 2003). A system to standardize virus names, and corresponding guidelines, has been proposed (Fauquet et al. in Arch Virol 145:1743-1761, 2000). This system is now followed by a large number of geminivirologists in the world, making geminivirus nomenclature more transparent and useful. In 2003, due to difficulties inherent in species identification, the ICTV Geminiviridae Study Group proposed new species demarcation criteria, the most important of which being an 89% nucleotide (nt) identity threshold between full-length DNA-A component nucleotide sequences for begomovirus species. This threshold has been utilised since with general satisfaction. More recently, an article has been published to clarify the terminology used to describe virus entities below the species level [5]. The present publication is proposing demarcation criteria and guidelines to classify and name geminiviruses below the species level. Using the Clustal V algorithm (DNAStar MegAlign software), the distribution of pairwise sequence comparisons, for pairs of sequences below the species taxonomic level, identified two peaks: one at 85-94% nt identity that is proposed to correspond to "strain" comparisons and one at 92-100% identity that corresponds to "variant" comparisons. Guidelines for descriptors for each of these levels are proposed to standardize nomenclature under the species level. In this publication we review the status of geminivirus species and strain demarcation as well as providing updated isolate descriptors for a total of 672 begomovirus isolates. As a consequence, we have revised the status of some virus isolates to classify them as "strains", whereas several others previously classified as "strains" have been upgraded to "species". In all other respects, the classification system has remained robust, and we therefore propose to continue using it. An updated list of all geminivirus isolates and a phylogenetic tree with one representative isolate per species are provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)783-821
Number of pages39
JournalArchives of Virology
Volume153
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Geminiviridae
Terminology
Begomovirus
Guidelines
Viruses
Names
Nucleotides
Software
Databases
DNA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Cite this

Fauquet, C. M., Briddon, R. W., Brown, J. K., Moriones, E., Stanley, J., Zerbini, M., & Zhou, X. (2008). Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature. Archives of Virology, 153(4), 783-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-008-0037-6

Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature. / Fauquet, C. M.; Briddon, R. W.; Brown, Judith K; Moriones, E.; Stanley, J.; Zerbini, M.; Zhou, X.

In: Archives of Virology, Vol. 153, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 783-821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fauquet, CM, Briddon, RW, Brown, JK, Moriones, E, Stanley, J, Zerbini, M & Zhou, X 2008, 'Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature', Archives of Virology, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 783-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-008-0037-6
Fauquet CM, Briddon RW, Brown JK, Moriones E, Stanley J, Zerbini M et al. Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature. Archives of Virology. 2008 Apr;153(4):783-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-008-0037-6
Fauquet, C. M. ; Briddon, R. W. ; Brown, Judith K ; Moriones, E. ; Stanley, J. ; Zerbini, M. ; Zhou, X. / Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature. In: Archives of Virology. 2008 ; Vol. 153, No. 4. pp. 783-821.
@article{a7a7be0cdc3b42099b24ffa1273a0938,
title = "Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature",
abstract = "Geminivirus taxonomy and nomenclature is growing in complexity with the number of genomic sequences deposited in sequence databases. Taxonomic and nomenclatural updates are published at regular intervals (Fauquet et al. in Arch Virol 145:1743-1761, 2000, Arch Virol 148:405-421, 2003). A system to standardize virus names, and corresponding guidelines, has been proposed (Fauquet et al. in Arch Virol 145:1743-1761, 2000). This system is now followed by a large number of geminivirologists in the world, making geminivirus nomenclature more transparent and useful. In 2003, due to difficulties inherent in species identification, the ICTV Geminiviridae Study Group proposed new species demarcation criteria, the most important of which being an 89{\%} nucleotide (nt) identity threshold between full-length DNA-A component nucleotide sequences for begomovirus species. This threshold has been utilised since with general satisfaction. More recently, an article has been published to clarify the terminology used to describe virus entities below the species level [5]. The present publication is proposing demarcation criteria and guidelines to classify and name geminiviruses below the species level. Using the Clustal V algorithm (DNAStar MegAlign software), the distribution of pairwise sequence comparisons, for pairs of sequences below the species taxonomic level, identified two peaks: one at 85-94{\%} nt identity that is proposed to correspond to {"}strain{"} comparisons and one at 92-100{\%} identity that corresponds to {"}variant{"} comparisons. Guidelines for descriptors for each of these levels are proposed to standardize nomenclature under the species level. In this publication we review the status of geminivirus species and strain demarcation as well as providing updated isolate descriptors for a total of 672 begomovirus isolates. As a consequence, we have revised the status of some virus isolates to classify them as {"}strains{"}, whereas several others previously classified as {"}strains{"} have been upgraded to {"}species{"}. In all other respects, the classification system has remained robust, and we therefore propose to continue using it. An updated list of all geminivirus isolates and a phylogenetic tree with one representative isolate per species are provided.",
author = "Fauquet, {C. M.} and Briddon, {R. W.} and Brown, {Judith K} and E. Moriones and J. Stanley and M. Zerbini and X. Zhou",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00705-008-0037-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "153",
pages = "783--821",
journal = "Archives of Virology",
issn = "0304-8608",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature

AU - Fauquet, C. M.

AU - Briddon, R. W.

AU - Brown, Judith K

AU - Moriones, E.

AU - Stanley, J.

AU - Zerbini, M.

AU - Zhou, X.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Geminivirus taxonomy and nomenclature is growing in complexity with the number of genomic sequences deposited in sequence databases. Taxonomic and nomenclatural updates are published at regular intervals (Fauquet et al. in Arch Virol 145:1743-1761, 2000, Arch Virol 148:405-421, 2003). A system to standardize virus names, and corresponding guidelines, has been proposed (Fauquet et al. in Arch Virol 145:1743-1761, 2000). This system is now followed by a large number of geminivirologists in the world, making geminivirus nomenclature more transparent and useful. In 2003, due to difficulties inherent in species identification, the ICTV Geminiviridae Study Group proposed new species demarcation criteria, the most important of which being an 89% nucleotide (nt) identity threshold between full-length DNA-A component nucleotide sequences for begomovirus species. This threshold has been utilised since with general satisfaction. More recently, an article has been published to clarify the terminology used to describe virus entities below the species level [5]. The present publication is proposing demarcation criteria and guidelines to classify and name geminiviruses below the species level. Using the Clustal V algorithm (DNAStar MegAlign software), the distribution of pairwise sequence comparisons, for pairs of sequences below the species taxonomic level, identified two peaks: one at 85-94% nt identity that is proposed to correspond to "strain" comparisons and one at 92-100% identity that corresponds to "variant" comparisons. Guidelines for descriptors for each of these levels are proposed to standardize nomenclature under the species level. In this publication we review the status of geminivirus species and strain demarcation as well as providing updated isolate descriptors for a total of 672 begomovirus isolates. As a consequence, we have revised the status of some virus isolates to classify them as "strains", whereas several others previously classified as "strains" have been upgraded to "species". In all other respects, the classification system has remained robust, and we therefore propose to continue using it. An updated list of all geminivirus isolates and a phylogenetic tree with one representative isolate per species are provided.

AB - Geminivirus taxonomy and nomenclature is growing in complexity with the number of genomic sequences deposited in sequence databases. Taxonomic and nomenclatural updates are published at regular intervals (Fauquet et al. in Arch Virol 145:1743-1761, 2000, Arch Virol 148:405-421, 2003). A system to standardize virus names, and corresponding guidelines, has been proposed (Fauquet et al. in Arch Virol 145:1743-1761, 2000). This system is now followed by a large number of geminivirologists in the world, making geminivirus nomenclature more transparent and useful. In 2003, due to difficulties inherent in species identification, the ICTV Geminiviridae Study Group proposed new species demarcation criteria, the most important of which being an 89% nucleotide (nt) identity threshold between full-length DNA-A component nucleotide sequences for begomovirus species. This threshold has been utilised since with general satisfaction. More recently, an article has been published to clarify the terminology used to describe virus entities below the species level [5]. The present publication is proposing demarcation criteria and guidelines to classify and name geminiviruses below the species level. Using the Clustal V algorithm (DNAStar MegAlign software), the distribution of pairwise sequence comparisons, for pairs of sequences below the species taxonomic level, identified two peaks: one at 85-94% nt identity that is proposed to correspond to "strain" comparisons and one at 92-100% identity that corresponds to "variant" comparisons. Guidelines for descriptors for each of these levels are proposed to standardize nomenclature under the species level. In this publication we review the status of geminivirus species and strain demarcation as well as providing updated isolate descriptors for a total of 672 begomovirus isolates. As a consequence, we have revised the status of some virus isolates to classify them as "strains", whereas several others previously classified as "strains" have been upgraded to "species". In all other respects, the classification system has remained robust, and we therefore propose to continue using it. An updated list of all geminivirus isolates and a phylogenetic tree with one representative isolate per species are provided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43349106661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43349106661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00705-008-0037-6

DO - 10.1007/s00705-008-0037-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 18256781

AN - SCOPUS:43349106661

VL - 153

SP - 783

EP - 821

JO - Archives of Virology

JF - Archives of Virology

SN - 0304-8608

IS - 4

ER -