Gender differences in productivity: Research specialization as a missing link

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 1984, when Cole and Zuckerman referred to gender differences in productivity among academic scientists as a puzzle, sociologists have sought to explain these differences by incorporating primarily institutional-level factors. In addition to these factors, the author contends that an undertheorized and heretofore unmeasured concept - the extent of research specialization - can also help explain the process by which gender affects research productivity. Although some researchers have examined areas of specialization, the extent of research specialization has been completely neglected in studies of academic careers. Using a probability sample of academics in two disciplines (sociology and linguistics), primary data collection, and simultaneous equation modeling, the author finds that the extent of research specialization is a critical intervening variable: Women specialize less than men and thereby lose out on an important means of increasing their productivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)754-780
Number of pages27
JournalGender and Society
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

specialization
gender-specific factors
productivity
academic career
sociologist
sociology
linguistics
Gender Differences
Research Productivity
gender
Productivity

Keywords

  • Academic science
  • Gender
  • Research productivity
  • Specialization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Gender Studies

Cite this

Gender differences in productivity : Research specialization as a missing link. / Leahey, Erin E.

In: Gender and Society, Vol. 20, No. 6, 12.2006, p. 754-780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64556a4ecdee47e180da46b37003d18c,
title = "Gender differences in productivity: Research specialization as a missing link",
abstract = "Since 1984, when Cole and Zuckerman referred to gender differences in productivity among academic scientists as a puzzle, sociologists have sought to explain these differences by incorporating primarily institutional-level factors. In addition to these factors, the author contends that an undertheorized and heretofore unmeasured concept - the extent of research specialization - can also help explain the process by which gender affects research productivity. Although some researchers have examined areas of specialization, the extent of research specialization has been completely neglected in studies of academic careers. Using a probability sample of academics in two disciplines (sociology and linguistics), primary data collection, and simultaneous equation modeling, the author finds that the extent of research specialization is a critical intervening variable: Women specialize less than men and thereby lose out on an important means of increasing their productivity.",
keywords = "Academic science, Gender, Research productivity, Specialization",
author = "Leahey, {Erin E}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0891243206293030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "754--780",
journal = "Gender and Society",
issn = "0891-2432",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in productivity

T2 - Research specialization as a missing link

AU - Leahey, Erin E

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Since 1984, when Cole and Zuckerman referred to gender differences in productivity among academic scientists as a puzzle, sociologists have sought to explain these differences by incorporating primarily institutional-level factors. In addition to these factors, the author contends that an undertheorized and heretofore unmeasured concept - the extent of research specialization - can also help explain the process by which gender affects research productivity. Although some researchers have examined areas of specialization, the extent of research specialization has been completely neglected in studies of academic careers. Using a probability sample of academics in two disciplines (sociology and linguistics), primary data collection, and simultaneous equation modeling, the author finds that the extent of research specialization is a critical intervening variable: Women specialize less than men and thereby lose out on an important means of increasing their productivity.

AB - Since 1984, when Cole and Zuckerman referred to gender differences in productivity among academic scientists as a puzzle, sociologists have sought to explain these differences by incorporating primarily institutional-level factors. In addition to these factors, the author contends that an undertheorized and heretofore unmeasured concept - the extent of research specialization - can also help explain the process by which gender affects research productivity. Although some researchers have examined areas of specialization, the extent of research specialization has been completely neglected in studies of academic careers. Using a probability sample of academics in two disciplines (sociology and linguistics), primary data collection, and simultaneous equation modeling, the author finds that the extent of research specialization is a critical intervening variable: Women specialize less than men and thereby lose out on an important means of increasing their productivity.

KW - Academic science

KW - Gender

KW - Research productivity

KW - Specialization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750463095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750463095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0891243206293030

DO - 10.1177/0891243206293030

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33750463095

VL - 20

SP - 754

EP - 780

JO - Gender and Society

JF - Gender and Society

SN - 0891-2432

IS - 6

ER -