Generalizability

Beyond plausibility and handwaving

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The question of how we apply knowledge from biomedical science to medical and public health practice has been the subject of heated debates about generalizability and related concepts, such as applicability and inductive inference. In this essay, I interpret the term from the perspective of two causal models: determinism and indeterminism. I suggest that theories of generalizability can be formulated on the basis of both models and take the form of testable but unverifiable hypotheses, an attribute that is common to all scientific theories. Nonetheless, there is one noteworthy difference between the two models: determinism allows one to rationalize a decision to treat a certain kind of patient but only indirectly a decision to treat any particular patient, whereas indeterminism accommodates both types of decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-159
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health Practice

Keywords

  • Applicability
  • Determinism
  • External validity
  • Indeterminism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Generalizability : Beyond plausibility and handwaving. / Shahar, Eyal.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 9, No. 2, 05.2003, p. 151-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2eb75f4036584d9b901ddd3dab7b135d,
title = "Generalizability: Beyond plausibility and handwaving",
abstract = "The question of how we apply knowledge from biomedical science to medical and public health practice has been the subject of heated debates about generalizability and related concepts, such as applicability and inductive inference. In this essay, I interpret the term from the perspective of two causal models: determinism and indeterminism. I suggest that theories of generalizability can be formulated on the basis of both models and take the form of testable but unverifiable hypotheses, an attribute that is common to all scientific theories. Nonetheless, there is one noteworthy difference between the two models: determinism allows one to rationalize a decision to treat a certain kind of patient but only indirectly a decision to treat any particular patient, whereas indeterminism accommodates both types of decisions.",
keywords = "Applicability, Determinism, External validity, Indeterminism",
author = "Eyal Shahar",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00383.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "151--159",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generalizability

T2 - Beyond plausibility and handwaving

AU - Shahar, Eyal

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - The question of how we apply knowledge from biomedical science to medical and public health practice has been the subject of heated debates about generalizability and related concepts, such as applicability and inductive inference. In this essay, I interpret the term from the perspective of two causal models: determinism and indeterminism. I suggest that theories of generalizability can be formulated on the basis of both models and take the form of testable but unverifiable hypotheses, an attribute that is common to all scientific theories. Nonetheless, there is one noteworthy difference between the two models: determinism allows one to rationalize a decision to treat a certain kind of patient but only indirectly a decision to treat any particular patient, whereas indeterminism accommodates both types of decisions.

AB - The question of how we apply knowledge from biomedical science to medical and public health practice has been the subject of heated debates about generalizability and related concepts, such as applicability and inductive inference. In this essay, I interpret the term from the perspective of two causal models: determinism and indeterminism. I suggest that theories of generalizability can be formulated on the basis of both models and take the form of testable but unverifiable hypotheses, an attribute that is common to all scientific theories. Nonetheless, there is one noteworthy difference between the two models: determinism allows one to rationalize a decision to treat a certain kind of patient but only indirectly a decision to treat any particular patient, whereas indeterminism accommodates both types of decisions.

KW - Applicability

KW - Determinism

KW - External validity

KW - Indeterminism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038128241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038128241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00383.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00383.x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 151

EP - 159

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 2

ER -