Going local: The fragmentation of genetic surveillance

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The FBI's two-decade-long dominance of the use of genetic surveillance for law enforcement purposes is ending. In its place, local police departments are creating DNA databases that operate outside of the FBI's national DNA database network. These local databases, which until now have remained unexamined, promise local law enforcement agencies freedom from the federal laws and regulations that govern the FBI's national network. This Article relies on original qualitative empirical research to describe why agencies created local databases and how these databases operate. It finds that while local DNA databases offer promise as a crime-solving tool, they generate harms that have so far been ignored. These harms include exacerbating racial inequities, threatening privacy and dignity interests, and undermining the legitimacy of the police. Because law enforcement agencies have not internalized these harms, the self-imposed regulations that currently restrain law enforcement's use of local DNA databases are insufficient. This Article proposes several modest, yet effective, reforms that will minimize the harms generated by local DNA databases, while at the same time preserving law enforcement's ability to wield this tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1491-1554
Number of pages64
JournalBoston University Law Review
Volume95
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2015

Fingerprint

law enforcement
fragmentation
surveillance
police
local law
federal law
self-regulation
privacy
empirical research
legitimacy
offense
regulation
reform
ability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Going local : The fragmentation of genetic surveillance. / Kreag, Jason.

In: Boston University Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 5, 10.2015, p. 1491-1554.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{a456083a522e49448f1c6dc7c8c2d90c,
title = "Going local: The fragmentation of genetic surveillance",
abstract = "The FBI's two-decade-long dominance of the use of genetic surveillance for law enforcement purposes is ending. In its place, local police departments are creating DNA databases that operate outside of the FBI's national DNA database network. These local databases, which until now have remained unexamined, promise local law enforcement agencies freedom from the federal laws and regulations that govern the FBI's national network. This Article relies on original qualitative empirical research to describe why agencies created local databases and how these databases operate. It finds that while local DNA databases offer promise as a crime-solving tool, they generate harms that have so far been ignored. These harms include exacerbating racial inequities, threatening privacy and dignity interests, and undermining the legitimacy of the police. Because law enforcement agencies have not internalized these harms, the self-imposed regulations that currently restrain law enforcement's use of local DNA databases are insufficient. This Article proposes several modest, yet effective, reforms that will minimize the harms generated by local DNA databases, while at the same time preserving law enforcement's ability to wield this tool.",
author = "Jason Kreag",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "1491--1554",
journal = "Boston University Law Review",
issn = "0006-8047",
publisher = "Boston University, School of Law",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Going local

T2 - The fragmentation of genetic surveillance

AU - Kreag, Jason

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - The FBI's two-decade-long dominance of the use of genetic surveillance for law enforcement purposes is ending. In its place, local police departments are creating DNA databases that operate outside of the FBI's national DNA database network. These local databases, which until now have remained unexamined, promise local law enforcement agencies freedom from the federal laws and regulations that govern the FBI's national network. This Article relies on original qualitative empirical research to describe why agencies created local databases and how these databases operate. It finds that while local DNA databases offer promise as a crime-solving tool, they generate harms that have so far been ignored. These harms include exacerbating racial inequities, threatening privacy and dignity interests, and undermining the legitimacy of the police. Because law enforcement agencies have not internalized these harms, the self-imposed regulations that currently restrain law enforcement's use of local DNA databases are insufficient. This Article proposes several modest, yet effective, reforms that will minimize the harms generated by local DNA databases, while at the same time preserving law enforcement's ability to wield this tool.

AB - The FBI's two-decade-long dominance of the use of genetic surveillance for law enforcement purposes is ending. In its place, local police departments are creating DNA databases that operate outside of the FBI's national DNA database network. These local databases, which until now have remained unexamined, promise local law enforcement agencies freedom from the federal laws and regulations that govern the FBI's national network. This Article relies on original qualitative empirical research to describe why agencies created local databases and how these databases operate. It finds that while local DNA databases offer promise as a crime-solving tool, they generate harms that have so far been ignored. These harms include exacerbating racial inequities, threatening privacy and dignity interests, and undermining the legitimacy of the police. Because law enforcement agencies have not internalized these harms, the self-imposed regulations that currently restrain law enforcement's use of local DNA databases are insufficient. This Article proposes several modest, yet effective, reforms that will minimize the harms generated by local DNA databases, while at the same time preserving law enforcement's ability to wield this tool.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964343924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964343924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84964343924

VL - 95

SP - 1491

EP - 1554

JO - Boston University Law Review

JF - Boston University Law Review

SN - 0006-8047

IS - 5

ER -