Goldmann tonometry tear film error and partial correction with a shaped applanation surface

Sean J. McCafferty, Eniko T Enikov, James T Schwiegerling, Sean M. Ashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to quantify the isolated tear film adhesion error in a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) prism and in a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) prism. Methods: The separation force of a tonometer prism adhered by a tear film to a simulated cornea was measured to quantify an isolated tear film adhesion force. Acrylic hemispheres (7.8 mm radius) used as corneas were lathed over the apical 3.06 mm diameter to simulate full applanation contact with the prism surface for both GAT and CATS prisms. Tear film separation measurements were completed with both an artificial tear and fluorescein solutions as a fluid bridge. The applanation mire thicknesses were measured and correlated with the tear film separation measurements. Human cadaver eyes were used to validate simulated cornea tear film separation measurement differences between the GAT and CATS prisms. Results: The CATS prism tear film adhesion error (2.74±0.21 mmHg) was significantly less than the GAT prism (4.57±0.18 mmHg, p<0.001). Tear film adhesion error was independent of applanation mire thickness (R2=0.09, p=0.04). Fluorescein produces more tear film error than artificial tears (+0.51±0.04 mmHg; p<0.001). Cadaver eye validation indicated the CATS prism’s tear film adhesion error (1.40±0.51 mmHg) was significantly less than that of the GAT prism (3.30±0.38 mmHg; p=0.002). Conclusion: Measured GAT tear film adhesion error is more than previously predicted. A CATS prism significantly reduced tear film adhesion error by ~41%. Fluorescein solution increases the tear film adhesion compared to artificial tears, while mire thickness has a negligible effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-78
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Ophthalmology
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 4 2018

Fingerprint

Manometry
Tears
Fluorescein
Cornea
Cadaver

Keywords

  • Applanation
  • Bias
  • Error
  • Glaucoma
  • Goldmann
  • Intraocular pressure
  • IOP
  • Tear film
  • Tonometer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Goldmann tonometry tear film error and partial correction with a shaped applanation surface. / McCafferty, Sean J.; Enikov, Eniko T; Schwiegerling, James T; Ashley, Sean M.

In: Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol. 12, 04.01.2018, p. 71-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c170f7d8c1114ec6b128919f38297022,
title = "Goldmann tonometry tear film error and partial correction with a shaped applanation surface",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of the study was to quantify the isolated tear film adhesion error in a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) prism and in a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) prism. Methods: The separation force of a tonometer prism adhered by a tear film to a simulated cornea was measured to quantify an isolated tear film adhesion force. Acrylic hemispheres (7.8 mm radius) used as corneas were lathed over the apical 3.06 mm diameter to simulate full applanation contact with the prism surface for both GAT and CATS prisms. Tear film separation measurements were completed with both an artificial tear and fluorescein solutions as a fluid bridge. The applanation mire thicknesses were measured and correlated with the tear film separation measurements. Human cadaver eyes were used to validate simulated cornea tear film separation measurement differences between the GAT and CATS prisms. Results: The CATS prism tear film adhesion error (2.74±0.21 mmHg) was significantly less than the GAT prism (4.57±0.18 mmHg, p<0.001). Tear film adhesion error was independent of applanation mire thickness (R2=0.09, p=0.04). Fluorescein produces more tear film error than artificial tears (+0.51±0.04 mmHg; p<0.001). Cadaver eye validation indicated the CATS prism’s tear film adhesion error (1.40±0.51 mmHg) was significantly less than that of the GAT prism (3.30±0.38 mmHg; p=0.002). Conclusion: Measured GAT tear film adhesion error is more than previously predicted. A CATS prism significantly reduced tear film adhesion error by ~41{\%}. Fluorescein solution increases the tear film adhesion compared to artificial tears, while mire thickness has a negligible effect.",
keywords = "Applanation, Bias, Error, Glaucoma, Goldmann, Intraocular pressure, IOP, Tear film, Tonometer",
author = "McCafferty, {Sean J.} and Enikov, {Eniko T} and Schwiegerling, {James T} and Ashley, {Sean M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.2147/OPTH.S152492",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "71--78",
journal = "Clinical Ophthalmology",
issn = "1177-5467",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Goldmann tonometry tear film error and partial correction with a shaped applanation surface

AU - McCafferty, Sean J.

AU - Enikov, Eniko T

AU - Schwiegerling, James T

AU - Ashley, Sean M.

PY - 2018/1/4

Y1 - 2018/1/4

N2 - Purpose: The aim of the study was to quantify the isolated tear film adhesion error in a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) prism and in a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) prism. Methods: The separation force of a tonometer prism adhered by a tear film to a simulated cornea was measured to quantify an isolated tear film adhesion force. Acrylic hemispheres (7.8 mm radius) used as corneas were lathed over the apical 3.06 mm diameter to simulate full applanation contact with the prism surface for both GAT and CATS prisms. Tear film separation measurements were completed with both an artificial tear and fluorescein solutions as a fluid bridge. The applanation mire thicknesses were measured and correlated with the tear film separation measurements. Human cadaver eyes were used to validate simulated cornea tear film separation measurement differences between the GAT and CATS prisms. Results: The CATS prism tear film adhesion error (2.74±0.21 mmHg) was significantly less than the GAT prism (4.57±0.18 mmHg, p<0.001). Tear film adhesion error was independent of applanation mire thickness (R2=0.09, p=0.04). Fluorescein produces more tear film error than artificial tears (+0.51±0.04 mmHg; p<0.001). Cadaver eye validation indicated the CATS prism’s tear film adhesion error (1.40±0.51 mmHg) was significantly less than that of the GAT prism (3.30±0.38 mmHg; p=0.002). Conclusion: Measured GAT tear film adhesion error is more than previously predicted. A CATS prism significantly reduced tear film adhesion error by ~41%. Fluorescein solution increases the tear film adhesion compared to artificial tears, while mire thickness has a negligible effect.

AB - Purpose: The aim of the study was to quantify the isolated tear film adhesion error in a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) prism and in a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) prism. Methods: The separation force of a tonometer prism adhered by a tear film to a simulated cornea was measured to quantify an isolated tear film adhesion force. Acrylic hemispheres (7.8 mm radius) used as corneas were lathed over the apical 3.06 mm diameter to simulate full applanation contact with the prism surface for both GAT and CATS prisms. Tear film separation measurements were completed with both an artificial tear and fluorescein solutions as a fluid bridge. The applanation mire thicknesses were measured and correlated with the tear film separation measurements. Human cadaver eyes were used to validate simulated cornea tear film separation measurement differences between the GAT and CATS prisms. Results: The CATS prism tear film adhesion error (2.74±0.21 mmHg) was significantly less than the GAT prism (4.57±0.18 mmHg, p<0.001). Tear film adhesion error was independent of applanation mire thickness (R2=0.09, p=0.04). Fluorescein produces more tear film error than artificial tears (+0.51±0.04 mmHg; p<0.001). Cadaver eye validation indicated the CATS prism’s tear film adhesion error (1.40±0.51 mmHg) was significantly less than that of the GAT prism (3.30±0.38 mmHg; p=0.002). Conclusion: Measured GAT tear film adhesion error is more than previously predicted. A CATS prism significantly reduced tear film adhesion error by ~41%. Fluorescein solution increases the tear film adhesion compared to artificial tears, while mire thickness has a negligible effect.

KW - Applanation

KW - Bias

KW - Error

KW - Glaucoma

KW - Goldmann

KW - Intraocular pressure

KW - IOP

KW - Tear film

KW - Tonometer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040861726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040861726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/OPTH.S152492

DO - 10.2147/OPTH.S152492

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040861726

VL - 12

SP - 71

EP - 78

JO - Clinical Ophthalmology

JF - Clinical Ophthalmology

SN - 1177-5467

ER -