Good days, bad days

Do sacrifices improve relationship quality?

Casey J. Totenhagen, Melissa A Curran, Joyce Serido, Emily A Butler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We utilized interdependence theory and conservation of resources to understand how relational sacrifices and hassles impact positive relationship quality constructs (i.e., satisfaction, closeness, and commitment) in romantic relationships (N = 164 couples; 328 individuals). Using daily diary data to examine actor and partner effects, we found that individuals' sacrifices were positively linked with their own commitment but not with satisfaction or closeness. We also found that hassles were negatively linked with one's own and one's partner's satisfaction and closeness but not with commitment. When examined together, sacrifices remained beneficial for one's own commitment but only when increased sacrifices occurred on days with low hassles. We discuss the unique pathways of sacrifices and hassles, both on their own and considered together.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)881-900
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Social and Personal Relationships
Volume30
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Conservation
commitment
interdependence
conservation
resources

Keywords

  • APIM
  • closeness
  • commitment
  • Daily diary
  • hassles
  • romantic relationships
  • sacrifices
  • satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Good days, bad days : Do sacrifices improve relationship quality? / Totenhagen, Casey J.; Curran, Melissa A; Serido, Joyce; Butler, Emily A.

In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 30, No. 7, 11.2013, p. 881-900.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce78bc4a64e049baa096079bb295752a,
title = "Good days, bad days: Do sacrifices improve relationship quality?",
abstract = "We utilized interdependence theory and conservation of resources to understand how relational sacrifices and hassles impact positive relationship quality constructs (i.e., satisfaction, closeness, and commitment) in romantic relationships (N = 164 couples; 328 individuals). Using daily diary data to examine actor and partner effects, we found that individuals' sacrifices were positively linked with their own commitment but not with satisfaction or closeness. We also found that hassles were negatively linked with one's own and one's partner's satisfaction and closeness but not with commitment. When examined together, sacrifices remained beneficial for one's own commitment but only when increased sacrifices occurred on days with low hassles. We discuss the unique pathways of sacrifices and hassles, both on their own and considered together.",
keywords = "APIM, closeness, commitment, Daily diary, hassles, romantic relationships, sacrifices, satisfaction",
author = "Totenhagen, {Casey J.} and Curran, {Melissa A} and Joyce Serido and Butler, {Emily A}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0265407512472475",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "881--900",
journal = "Journal of Social and Personal Relationships",
issn = "0265-4075",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Good days, bad days

T2 - Do sacrifices improve relationship quality?

AU - Totenhagen, Casey J.

AU - Curran, Melissa A

AU - Serido, Joyce

AU - Butler, Emily A

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - We utilized interdependence theory and conservation of resources to understand how relational sacrifices and hassles impact positive relationship quality constructs (i.e., satisfaction, closeness, and commitment) in romantic relationships (N = 164 couples; 328 individuals). Using daily diary data to examine actor and partner effects, we found that individuals' sacrifices were positively linked with their own commitment but not with satisfaction or closeness. We also found that hassles were negatively linked with one's own and one's partner's satisfaction and closeness but not with commitment. When examined together, sacrifices remained beneficial for one's own commitment but only when increased sacrifices occurred on days with low hassles. We discuss the unique pathways of sacrifices and hassles, both on their own and considered together.

AB - We utilized interdependence theory and conservation of resources to understand how relational sacrifices and hassles impact positive relationship quality constructs (i.e., satisfaction, closeness, and commitment) in romantic relationships (N = 164 couples; 328 individuals). Using daily diary data to examine actor and partner effects, we found that individuals' sacrifices were positively linked with their own commitment but not with satisfaction or closeness. We also found that hassles were negatively linked with one's own and one's partner's satisfaction and closeness but not with commitment. When examined together, sacrifices remained beneficial for one's own commitment but only when increased sacrifices occurred on days with low hassles. We discuss the unique pathways of sacrifices and hassles, both on their own and considered together.

KW - APIM

KW - closeness

KW - commitment

KW - Daily diary

KW - hassles

KW - romantic relationships

KW - sacrifices

KW - satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885192340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885192340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0265407512472475

DO - 10.1177/0265407512472475

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 881

EP - 900

JO - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

JF - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

SN - 0265-4075

IS - 7

ER -