Governing evolution: A socioecological comparison of resistance management for insecticidal transgenic Bt crops among four countries

Yves Carrière, Zachary S. Brown, Sharon J. Downes, Govind Gujar, Graham Epstein, Celso Omoto, Nicholas P. Storer, David Mota-Sanchez, Peter Søgaard Jørgensen, Scott P. Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Cooperative management of pest susceptibility to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops is pursued worldwide in a variety of forms and to varying degrees of success depending on context. We examine this context using a comparative socioecological analysis of resistance management in Australia, Brazil, India, and the United States. We find that a shared understanding of resistance risks among government regulators, growers, and other actors is critical for effective governance. Furthermore, monitoring of grower compliance with resistance management requirements, surveillance of resistance, and mechanisms to support rapid implementation of remedial actions are essential to achieve desirable outcomes. Mandated resistance management measures, strong coordination between actors, and direct linkages between the group that appraises resistance risks and growers also appear to enhance prospects for effective governance. Our analysis highlights factors that could improve current governance systems and inform other initiatives to conserve susceptibility as a contribution to the cause of public good.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmbio
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

resistance management
Bacilli
Crops
crop
management
governance
factor analysis
compliance
Factor analysis
monitoring
comparison
surveillance
Monitoring
Brazil
India
cause

Keywords

  • Bacillus thuringiensis crops
  • Conservation and monitoring
  • Institutional analysis and development
  • Sustainability
  • Transgenic crops

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Ecology

Cite this

Governing evolution : A socioecological comparison of resistance management for insecticidal transgenic Bt crops among four countries. / Carrière, Yves; Brown, Zachary S.; Downes, Sharon J.; Gujar, Govind; Epstein, Graham; Omoto, Celso; Storer, Nicholas P.; Mota-Sanchez, David; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter; Carroll, Scott P.

In: Ambio, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Carrière, Y, Brown, ZS, Downes, SJ, Gujar, G, Epstein, G, Omoto, C, Storer, NP, Mota-Sanchez, D, Søgaard Jørgensen, P & Carroll, SP 2019, 'Governing evolution: A socioecological comparison of resistance management for insecticidal transgenic Bt crops among four countries', Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01167-0
Carrière, Yves ; Brown, Zachary S. ; Downes, Sharon J. ; Gujar, Govind ; Epstein, Graham ; Omoto, Celso ; Storer, Nicholas P. ; Mota-Sanchez, David ; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter ; Carroll, Scott P. / Governing evolution : A socioecological comparison of resistance management for insecticidal transgenic Bt crops among four countries. In: Ambio. 2019.
@article{1507b246a0f742b0b2a2b260975f1eda,
title = "Governing evolution: A socioecological comparison of resistance management for insecticidal transgenic Bt crops among four countries",
abstract = "Cooperative management of pest susceptibility to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops is pursued worldwide in a variety of forms and to varying degrees of success depending on context. We examine this context using a comparative socioecological analysis of resistance management in Australia, Brazil, India, and the United States. We find that a shared understanding of resistance risks among government regulators, growers, and other actors is critical for effective governance. Furthermore, monitoring of grower compliance with resistance management requirements, surveillance of resistance, and mechanisms to support rapid implementation of remedial actions are essential to achieve desirable outcomes. Mandated resistance management measures, strong coordination between actors, and direct linkages between the group that appraises resistance risks and growers also appear to enhance prospects for effective governance. Our analysis highlights factors that could improve current governance systems and inform other initiatives to conserve susceptibility as a contribution to the cause of public good.",
keywords = "Bacillus thuringiensis crops, Conservation and monitoring, Institutional analysis and development, Sustainability, Transgenic crops",
author = "Yves Carri{\`e}re and Brown, {Zachary S.} and Downes, {Sharon J.} and Govind Gujar and Graham Epstein and Celso Omoto and Storer, {Nicholas P.} and David Mota-Sanchez and {S{\o}gaard J{\o}rgensen}, Peter and Carroll, {Scott P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13280-019-01167-0",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Ambio",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing evolution

T2 - A socioecological comparison of resistance management for insecticidal transgenic Bt crops among four countries

AU - Carrière, Yves

AU - Brown, Zachary S.

AU - Downes, Sharon J.

AU - Gujar, Govind

AU - Epstein, Graham

AU - Omoto, Celso

AU - Storer, Nicholas P.

AU - Mota-Sanchez, David

AU - Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter

AU - Carroll, Scott P.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Cooperative management of pest susceptibility to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops is pursued worldwide in a variety of forms and to varying degrees of success depending on context. We examine this context using a comparative socioecological analysis of resistance management in Australia, Brazil, India, and the United States. We find that a shared understanding of resistance risks among government regulators, growers, and other actors is critical for effective governance. Furthermore, monitoring of grower compliance with resistance management requirements, surveillance of resistance, and mechanisms to support rapid implementation of remedial actions are essential to achieve desirable outcomes. Mandated resistance management measures, strong coordination between actors, and direct linkages between the group that appraises resistance risks and growers also appear to enhance prospects for effective governance. Our analysis highlights factors that could improve current governance systems and inform other initiatives to conserve susceptibility as a contribution to the cause of public good.

AB - Cooperative management of pest susceptibility to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops is pursued worldwide in a variety of forms and to varying degrees of success depending on context. We examine this context using a comparative socioecological analysis of resistance management in Australia, Brazil, India, and the United States. We find that a shared understanding of resistance risks among government regulators, growers, and other actors is critical for effective governance. Furthermore, monitoring of grower compliance with resistance management requirements, surveillance of resistance, and mechanisms to support rapid implementation of remedial actions are essential to achieve desirable outcomes. Mandated resistance management measures, strong coordination between actors, and direct linkages between the group that appraises resistance risks and growers also appear to enhance prospects for effective governance. Our analysis highlights factors that could improve current governance systems and inform other initiatives to conserve susceptibility as a contribution to the cause of public good.

KW - Bacillus thuringiensis crops

KW - Conservation and monitoring

KW - Institutional analysis and development

KW - Sustainability

KW - Transgenic crops

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070670599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070670599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-019-01167-0

DO - 10.1007/s13280-019-01167-0

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85070670599

JO - Ambio

JF - Ambio

SN - 0044-7447

ER -