Groundwater governance in the United States: A mosaic of approaches

Sharon B Megdal, Adriana Zuniga Teran, Robert G Varady, Nathaniel Delano, Andrea K. Gerlak, Ethan T. Vimont

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Groundwater is an important water supply for meeting municipal, industrial, and agricultural water demands and for supporting riparian and other ecological systems in the United States (U.S.). Effective groundwater governance is therefore crucial to the wise use of this largely non-renewable resource (recharge rates are slower than extraction rates). While minimum, federally-established drinking-water quality and water-discharge regulations do exist, the framework of the laws and regulations governing groundwater use in this country is highly decentralized. Each state determines its own groundwater priorities and governance approaches, with the further potential for states to delegate significant responsibilities to sub-state jurisdictions. Painting the groundwater governance picture in the U.S. with a single brushstroke is therefore impossible; a more refined analysis is required to characterize the mosaic of groundwater governance priorities and approaches. In this chapter, we report on findings of a nationwide survey on groundwater governance. We address the variation in circumstances and approaches across the country, and provide insights into some challenges identified by survey respondents. To demonstrate the changing nature of groundwater governance and groundwater debates, we consider twoWestern U.S. states, California and Arizona. Arizona has long practiced groundwater management in designated parts of the state, while California only recently adopted a comprehensive approach to groundwater management. We conclude with a synopsis of ongoing national-scale research and a look to the future of groundwater governance in the U.S.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Groundwater Governance
PublisherCRC Press
Pages483-509
Number of pages27
ISBN (Electronic)9781351808415
ISBN (Print)9781138029804
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Groundwater
groundwater
mosaic
governance approach
nonrenewable resource
Painting
water demand
Water supply
Potable water
Water quality
Water
recharge
water supply
drinking water
water quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Megdal, S. B., Teran, A. Z., Varady, R. G., Delano, N., Gerlak, A. K., & Vimont, E. T. (2017). Groundwater governance in the United States: A mosaic of approaches. In Advances in Groundwater Governance (pp. 483-509). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315210025

Groundwater governance in the United States : A mosaic of approaches. / Megdal, Sharon B; Teran, Adriana Zuniga; Varady, Robert G; Delano, Nathaniel; Gerlak, Andrea K.; Vimont, Ethan T.

Advances in Groundwater Governance. CRC Press, 2017. p. 483-509.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Megdal, SB, Teran, AZ, Varady, RG, Delano, N, Gerlak, AK & Vimont, ET 2017, Groundwater governance in the United States: A mosaic of approaches. in Advances in Groundwater Governance. CRC Press, pp. 483-509. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315210025
Megdal SB, Teran AZ, Varady RG, Delano N, Gerlak AK, Vimont ET. Groundwater governance in the United States: A mosaic of approaches. In Advances in Groundwater Governance. CRC Press. 2017. p. 483-509 https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315210025
Megdal, Sharon B ; Teran, Adriana Zuniga ; Varady, Robert G ; Delano, Nathaniel ; Gerlak, Andrea K. ; Vimont, Ethan T. / Groundwater governance in the United States : A mosaic of approaches. Advances in Groundwater Governance. CRC Press, 2017. pp. 483-509
@inbook{539946081e3d4686ac15b470dda66fb8,
title = "Groundwater governance in the United States: A mosaic of approaches",
abstract = "Groundwater is an important water supply for meeting municipal, industrial, and agricultural water demands and for supporting riparian and other ecological systems in the United States (U.S.). Effective groundwater governance is therefore crucial to the wise use of this largely non-renewable resource (recharge rates are slower than extraction rates). While minimum, federally-established drinking-water quality and water-discharge regulations do exist, the framework of the laws and regulations governing groundwater use in this country is highly decentralized. Each state determines its own groundwater priorities and governance approaches, with the further potential for states to delegate significant responsibilities to sub-state jurisdictions. Painting the groundwater governance picture in the U.S. with a single brushstroke is therefore impossible; a more refined analysis is required to characterize the mosaic of groundwater governance priorities and approaches. In this chapter, we report on findings of a nationwide survey on groundwater governance. We address the variation in circumstances and approaches across the country, and provide insights into some challenges identified by survey respondents. To demonstrate the changing nature of groundwater governance and groundwater debates, we consider twoWestern U.S. states, California and Arizona. Arizona has long practiced groundwater management in designated parts of the state, while California only recently adopted a comprehensive approach to groundwater management. We conclude with a synopsis of ongoing national-scale research and a look to the future of groundwater governance in the U.S.",
author = "Megdal, {Sharon B} and Teran, {Adriana Zuniga} and Varady, {Robert G} and Nathaniel Delano and Gerlak, {Andrea K.} and Vimont, {Ethan T.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1201/9781315210025",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138029804",
pages = "483--509",
booktitle = "Advances in Groundwater Governance",
publisher = "CRC Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Groundwater governance in the United States

T2 - A mosaic of approaches

AU - Megdal, Sharon B

AU - Teran, Adriana Zuniga

AU - Varady, Robert G

AU - Delano, Nathaniel

AU - Gerlak, Andrea K.

AU - Vimont, Ethan T.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Groundwater is an important water supply for meeting municipal, industrial, and agricultural water demands and for supporting riparian and other ecological systems in the United States (U.S.). Effective groundwater governance is therefore crucial to the wise use of this largely non-renewable resource (recharge rates are slower than extraction rates). While minimum, federally-established drinking-water quality and water-discharge regulations do exist, the framework of the laws and regulations governing groundwater use in this country is highly decentralized. Each state determines its own groundwater priorities and governance approaches, with the further potential for states to delegate significant responsibilities to sub-state jurisdictions. Painting the groundwater governance picture in the U.S. with a single brushstroke is therefore impossible; a more refined analysis is required to characterize the mosaic of groundwater governance priorities and approaches. In this chapter, we report on findings of a nationwide survey on groundwater governance. We address the variation in circumstances and approaches across the country, and provide insights into some challenges identified by survey respondents. To demonstrate the changing nature of groundwater governance and groundwater debates, we consider twoWestern U.S. states, California and Arizona. Arizona has long practiced groundwater management in designated parts of the state, while California only recently adopted a comprehensive approach to groundwater management. We conclude with a synopsis of ongoing national-scale research and a look to the future of groundwater governance in the U.S.

AB - Groundwater is an important water supply for meeting municipal, industrial, and agricultural water demands and for supporting riparian and other ecological systems in the United States (U.S.). Effective groundwater governance is therefore crucial to the wise use of this largely non-renewable resource (recharge rates are slower than extraction rates). While minimum, federally-established drinking-water quality and water-discharge regulations do exist, the framework of the laws and regulations governing groundwater use in this country is highly decentralized. Each state determines its own groundwater priorities and governance approaches, with the further potential for states to delegate significant responsibilities to sub-state jurisdictions. Painting the groundwater governance picture in the U.S. with a single brushstroke is therefore impossible; a more refined analysis is required to characterize the mosaic of groundwater governance priorities and approaches. In this chapter, we report on findings of a nationwide survey on groundwater governance. We address the variation in circumstances and approaches across the country, and provide insights into some challenges identified by survey respondents. To demonstrate the changing nature of groundwater governance and groundwater debates, we consider twoWestern U.S. states, California and Arizona. Arizona has long practiced groundwater management in designated parts of the state, while California only recently adopted a comprehensive approach to groundwater management. We conclude with a synopsis of ongoing national-scale research and a look to the future of groundwater governance in the U.S.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053351294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053351294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1201/9781315210025

DO - 10.1201/9781315210025

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85053351294

SN - 9781138029804

SP - 483

EP - 509

BT - Advances in Groundwater Governance

PB - CRC Press

ER -