Groundwater management institutions to protect riparian habitat

Patricia Orr, Bonnie G Colby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Groundwater pumping affects riparian habitat when it causes the water table to drop beyond the reach of riparian plants. Riparian habitat provides services that are not directly traded in markets, as is the case with many environmental amenities. There is no direct market where one may buy or sell the mix of services provided by a riparian corridor. The objective of this article is to review groundwater management mechanisms and assess their strengths and weaknesses for preserving the ecological integrity of riparian areas threatened by groundwater pumping. Policy instruments available to those concerned with the effects of groundwater pumping on riparian areas fall into three broad categories: (1) command and control (CAC), (2) incentive-based economic instruments, and (3) cooperative/suasive strategies. The case of the San Pedro River illustrates multiple and overlapping strategies applied in an ongoing attempt to reverse accumulating damage to a riparian ecosystem. Policy makers in the United States can choose among a broad menu of policy options to protect riparian habitat from groundwater pumping. They can capitalize on the clarity of command-and-control strategies, the flexibility and less obtrusive nature of incentive-based economic strategies, and the benefits that collaborative efforts can bring in the form of mutual consideration. While collaborative problem solving and market-based instruments are important policy tools, experience indicates that a well-formulated regulatory structure to limit regional groundwater pumping is an essential component of an effective riparian protection strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberW12S03
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume40
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

Groundwater
groundwater
pumping
riparian areas
habitat
habitats
market
incentive
direct marketing
markets
economic instrument
economics
Economics
menu planning
amenity
Ecosystems
cooperatives
water table
Rivers
damage

Keywords

  • Economics
  • Groundwater
  • Policy
  • Riparian area
  • Stream flows
  • Water law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Aquatic Science
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Groundwater management institutions to protect riparian habitat. / Orr, Patricia; Colby, Bonnie G.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 40, No. 12, W12S03, 12.2004, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5afdb126ebea4035b045facb60356fce,
title = "Groundwater management institutions to protect riparian habitat",
abstract = "Groundwater pumping affects riparian habitat when it causes the water table to drop beyond the reach of riparian plants. Riparian habitat provides services that are not directly traded in markets, as is the case with many environmental amenities. There is no direct market where one may buy or sell the mix of services provided by a riparian corridor. The objective of this article is to review groundwater management mechanisms and assess their strengths and weaknesses for preserving the ecological integrity of riparian areas threatened by groundwater pumping. Policy instruments available to those concerned with the effects of groundwater pumping on riparian areas fall into three broad categories: (1) command and control (CAC), (2) incentive-based economic instruments, and (3) cooperative/suasive strategies. The case of the San Pedro River illustrates multiple and overlapping strategies applied in an ongoing attempt to reverse accumulating damage to a riparian ecosystem. Policy makers in the United States can choose among a broad menu of policy options to protect riparian habitat from groundwater pumping. They can capitalize on the clarity of command-and-control strategies, the flexibility and less obtrusive nature of incentive-based economic strategies, and the benefits that collaborative efforts can bring in the form of mutual consideration. While collaborative problem solving and market-based instruments are important policy tools, experience indicates that a well-formulated regulatory structure to limit regional groundwater pumping is an essential component of an effective riparian protection strategy.",
keywords = "Economics, Groundwater, Policy, Riparian area, Stream flows, Water law",
author = "Patricia Orr and Colby, {Bonnie G}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1029/2003WR002741",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Groundwater management institutions to protect riparian habitat

AU - Orr, Patricia

AU - Colby, Bonnie G

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Groundwater pumping affects riparian habitat when it causes the water table to drop beyond the reach of riparian plants. Riparian habitat provides services that are not directly traded in markets, as is the case with many environmental amenities. There is no direct market where one may buy or sell the mix of services provided by a riparian corridor. The objective of this article is to review groundwater management mechanisms and assess their strengths and weaknesses for preserving the ecological integrity of riparian areas threatened by groundwater pumping. Policy instruments available to those concerned with the effects of groundwater pumping on riparian areas fall into three broad categories: (1) command and control (CAC), (2) incentive-based economic instruments, and (3) cooperative/suasive strategies. The case of the San Pedro River illustrates multiple and overlapping strategies applied in an ongoing attempt to reverse accumulating damage to a riparian ecosystem. Policy makers in the United States can choose among a broad menu of policy options to protect riparian habitat from groundwater pumping. They can capitalize on the clarity of command-and-control strategies, the flexibility and less obtrusive nature of incentive-based economic strategies, and the benefits that collaborative efforts can bring in the form of mutual consideration. While collaborative problem solving and market-based instruments are important policy tools, experience indicates that a well-formulated regulatory structure to limit regional groundwater pumping is an essential component of an effective riparian protection strategy.

AB - Groundwater pumping affects riparian habitat when it causes the water table to drop beyond the reach of riparian plants. Riparian habitat provides services that are not directly traded in markets, as is the case with many environmental amenities. There is no direct market where one may buy or sell the mix of services provided by a riparian corridor. The objective of this article is to review groundwater management mechanisms and assess their strengths and weaknesses for preserving the ecological integrity of riparian areas threatened by groundwater pumping. Policy instruments available to those concerned with the effects of groundwater pumping on riparian areas fall into three broad categories: (1) command and control (CAC), (2) incentive-based economic instruments, and (3) cooperative/suasive strategies. The case of the San Pedro River illustrates multiple and overlapping strategies applied in an ongoing attempt to reverse accumulating damage to a riparian ecosystem. Policy makers in the United States can choose among a broad menu of policy options to protect riparian habitat from groundwater pumping. They can capitalize on the clarity of command-and-control strategies, the flexibility and less obtrusive nature of incentive-based economic strategies, and the benefits that collaborative efforts can bring in the form of mutual consideration. While collaborative problem solving and market-based instruments are important policy tools, experience indicates that a well-formulated regulatory structure to limit regional groundwater pumping is an essential component of an effective riparian protection strategy.

KW - Economics

KW - Groundwater

KW - Policy

KW - Riparian area

KW - Stream flows

KW - Water law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12544259924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12544259924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2003WR002741

DO - 10.1029/2003WR002741

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:12544259924

VL - 40

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 12

M1 - W12S03

ER -