Group, sub-group and nominal group idea generation in an electronic meeting environment

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How should a group organize itself to generate ideas? Should all group members work together as one group, should they form several smaller sub-groups that work independently, or should members work separately as individuals? Previous research outside of Electronic Meeting Environments presents a clear and unambiguious answer members should work individually. Any benefits from group interaction (i.e. process gains) for idea generation are outweighed by the negative effects of group interaction (i.e. process losses). This paper re-examines this question in an electronic meeting environment through a reanalysis of two prior experiments. In contrast to findings from previous non-computer-mediated idea generation research, groups generated more ideas (with higher quality) than did the same number of participants working as individuals or in several smaller sub-groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number184189
Pages (from-to)573-579
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991
Event24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 1991 - Kauai, United States
Duration: Jan 8 1991Jan 11 1991

Fingerprint

Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{28787636f06d4bd5b5352f537c7c7649,
title = "Group, sub-group and nominal group idea generation in an electronic meeting environment",
abstract = "How should a group organize itself to generate ideas? Should all group members work together as one group, should they form several smaller sub-groups that work independently, or should members work separately as individuals? Previous research outside of Electronic Meeting Environments presents a clear and unambiguious answer members should work individually. Any benefits from group interaction (i.e. process gains) for idea generation are outweighed by the negative effects of group interaction (i.e. process losses). This paper re-examines this question in an electronic meeting environment through a reanalysis of two prior experiments. In contrast to findings from previous non-computer-mediated idea generation research, groups generated more ideas (with higher quality) than did the same number of participants working as individuals or in several smaller sub-groups.",
author = "Dennis, {Alan R.} and Valacich, {Joseph S.} and Nunamaker, {J. F.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/HICSS.1991.184189",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "573--579",
journal = "Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences",
issn = "1530-1605",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group, sub-group and nominal group idea generation in an electronic meeting environment

AU - Dennis, Alan R.

AU - Valacich, Joseph S.

AU - Nunamaker, J. F.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - How should a group organize itself to generate ideas? Should all group members work together as one group, should they form several smaller sub-groups that work independently, or should members work separately as individuals? Previous research outside of Electronic Meeting Environments presents a clear and unambiguious answer members should work individually. Any benefits from group interaction (i.e. process gains) for idea generation are outweighed by the negative effects of group interaction (i.e. process losses). This paper re-examines this question in an electronic meeting environment through a reanalysis of two prior experiments. In contrast to findings from previous non-computer-mediated idea generation research, groups generated more ideas (with higher quality) than did the same number of participants working as individuals or in several smaller sub-groups.

AB - How should a group organize itself to generate ideas? Should all group members work together as one group, should they form several smaller sub-groups that work independently, or should members work separately as individuals? Previous research outside of Electronic Meeting Environments presents a clear and unambiguious answer members should work individually. Any benefits from group interaction (i.e. process gains) for idea generation are outweighed by the negative effects of group interaction (i.e. process losses). This paper re-examines this question in an electronic meeting environment through a reanalysis of two prior experiments. In contrast to findings from previous non-computer-mediated idea generation research, groups generated more ideas (with higher quality) than did the same number of participants working as individuals or in several smaller sub-groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041849342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041849342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/HICSS.1991.184189

DO - 10.1109/HICSS.1991.184189

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:0041849342

VL - 3

SP - 573

EP - 579

JO - Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

SN - 1530-1605

M1 - 184189

ER -