Habitat selection of Israel desert rodents: comparison of a traditional and new method of analysis.

Z. Abramsky, Michael L Rosenzweig, S. Brand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studied habitat selection in six rodent species that occur in sandy or rocky areas of the Israeli desert using two complementary quantitative techniques. A distribution method for detecting habitat selection takes cognizance of density dependence but cannot establish what properties of the environment are being selected by the species. This and the traditional regression method were equally successful in discriminating between rodent species that exhibit selection and those that do not. Only the regression method can suggest the habitat variables that are actually preferred by a species. Either temporal or spatial variation in the data may result in backward regressions (indicating the right variable but in the wrong direction), because populations at low densities may be restricted to their best habitats. At high densities, however, populations utilize both preferred and marginal habitats. When both temporal and spatial variation exist, the regression method may fail altogether to detect habitat selection even when it exists. The distribution method does not suffer from this weakness.-from Authors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-88
Number of pages10
JournalOikos
Volume45
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

habitat preferences
habitat selection
Israel
rodent
deserts
rodents
desert
temporal variation
spatial variation
habitat
habitats
methodology
density dependence
quantitative analysis
population density
analysis
comparison
method
distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Habitat selection of Israel desert rodents : comparison of a traditional and new method of analysis. / Abramsky, Z.; Rosenzweig, Michael L; Brand, S.

In: Oikos, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1985, p. 79-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc0f9a78e0c84040b322863728d75b15,
title = "Habitat selection of Israel desert rodents: comparison of a traditional and new method of analysis.",
abstract = "Studied habitat selection in six rodent species that occur in sandy or rocky areas of the Israeli desert using two complementary quantitative techniques. A distribution method for detecting habitat selection takes cognizance of density dependence but cannot establish what properties of the environment are being selected by the species. This and the traditional regression method were equally successful in discriminating between rodent species that exhibit selection and those that do not. Only the regression method can suggest the habitat variables that are actually preferred by a species. Either temporal or spatial variation in the data may result in backward regressions (indicating the right variable but in the wrong direction), because populations at low densities may be restricted to their best habitats. At high densities, however, populations utilize both preferred and marginal habitats. When both temporal and spatial variation exist, the regression method may fail altogether to detect habitat selection even when it exists. The distribution method does not suffer from this weakness.-from Authors",
author = "Z. Abramsky and Rosenzweig, {Michael L} and S. Brand",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "79--88",
journal = "Oikos",
issn = "0030-1299",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Habitat selection of Israel desert rodents

T2 - comparison of a traditional and new method of analysis.

AU - Abramsky, Z.

AU - Rosenzweig, Michael L

AU - Brand, S.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Studied habitat selection in six rodent species that occur in sandy or rocky areas of the Israeli desert using two complementary quantitative techniques. A distribution method for detecting habitat selection takes cognizance of density dependence but cannot establish what properties of the environment are being selected by the species. This and the traditional regression method were equally successful in discriminating between rodent species that exhibit selection and those that do not. Only the regression method can suggest the habitat variables that are actually preferred by a species. Either temporal or spatial variation in the data may result in backward regressions (indicating the right variable but in the wrong direction), because populations at low densities may be restricted to their best habitats. At high densities, however, populations utilize both preferred and marginal habitats. When both temporal and spatial variation exist, the regression method may fail altogether to detect habitat selection even when it exists. The distribution method does not suffer from this weakness.-from Authors

AB - Studied habitat selection in six rodent species that occur in sandy or rocky areas of the Israeli desert using two complementary quantitative techniques. A distribution method for detecting habitat selection takes cognizance of density dependence but cannot establish what properties of the environment are being selected by the species. This and the traditional regression method were equally successful in discriminating between rodent species that exhibit selection and those that do not. Only the regression method can suggest the habitat variables that are actually preferred by a species. Either temporal or spatial variation in the data may result in backward regressions (indicating the right variable but in the wrong direction), because populations at low densities may be restricted to their best habitats. At high densities, however, populations utilize both preferred and marginal habitats. When both temporal and spatial variation exist, the regression method may fail altogether to detect habitat selection even when it exists. The distribution method does not suffer from this weakness.-from Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022233193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022233193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0022233193

VL - 45

SP - 79

EP - 88

JO - Oikos

JF - Oikos

SN - 0030-1299

IS - 1

ER -