Half empty, half full, or neither: Law, inequality, and social change in capitalist democracies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reviewing research on organizational compliance, the politics of law, law and social movements, law and inequality, and law, and social change, this article examines conditions under which legal institutions have more or less capacity to promote inequality-reducing social change in democratic capitalism. Law produces social change through a combination of rational adaptation to legal incentive structures, cultural meaning making and institutional diffusion, and political mobilization and counter-mobilization. Substantive effects-oriented administrative, adjudicative, and organizational interpretations of welfare-oriented legislation maximizes inequality reduction. These interpretations are most likely to be achieved through a combination of collective mobilization for strategic litigation in conjunction with sustained political mobilization from below both in society and in organizations, accompanied by the influence in implementation and also active monitoring by law and social science-savvy reformers representing the interests of disadvantaged classes and groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-97
Number of pages29
JournalAnnual Review of Law and Social Science
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social change
democracy
Law
mobilization
interpretation
Social Movements
capitalist society
social science
welfare
legislation
incentive
monitoring
politics
Group

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Economy
  • Institutionalism
  • Politics
  • Rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{7a0e48f5516244118d0a13b83645ce7e,
title = "Half empty, half full, or neither: Law, inequality, and social change in capitalist democracies",
abstract = "Reviewing research on organizational compliance, the politics of law, law and social movements, law and inequality, and law, and social change, this article examines conditions under which legal institutions have more or less capacity to promote inequality-reducing social change in democratic capitalism. Law produces social change through a combination of rational adaptation to legal incentive structures, cultural meaning making and institutional diffusion, and political mobilization and counter-mobilization. Substantive effects-oriented administrative, adjudicative, and organizational interpretations of welfare-oriented legislation maximizes inequality reduction. These interpretations are most likely to be achieved through a combination of collective mobilization for strategic litigation in conjunction with sustained political mobilization from below both in society and in organizations, accompanied by the influence in implementation and also active monitoring by law and social science-savvy reformers representing the interests of disadvantaged classes and groups.",
keywords = "Discrimination, Economy, Institutionalism, Politics, Rights",
author = "Stryker, {Robin S}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112728",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "69--97",
journal = "Annual Review of Law and Social Science",
issn = "1550-3585",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Half empty, half full, or neither

T2 - Law, inequality, and social change in capitalist democracies

AU - Stryker, Robin S

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Reviewing research on organizational compliance, the politics of law, law and social movements, law and inequality, and law, and social change, this article examines conditions under which legal institutions have more or less capacity to promote inequality-reducing social change in democratic capitalism. Law produces social change through a combination of rational adaptation to legal incentive structures, cultural meaning making and institutional diffusion, and political mobilization and counter-mobilization. Substantive effects-oriented administrative, adjudicative, and organizational interpretations of welfare-oriented legislation maximizes inequality reduction. These interpretations are most likely to be achieved through a combination of collective mobilization for strategic litigation in conjunction with sustained political mobilization from below both in society and in organizations, accompanied by the influence in implementation and also active monitoring by law and social science-savvy reformers representing the interests of disadvantaged classes and groups.

AB - Reviewing research on organizational compliance, the politics of law, law and social movements, law and inequality, and law, and social change, this article examines conditions under which legal institutions have more or less capacity to promote inequality-reducing social change in democratic capitalism. Law produces social change through a combination of rational adaptation to legal incentive structures, cultural meaning making and institutional diffusion, and political mobilization and counter-mobilization. Substantive effects-oriented administrative, adjudicative, and organizational interpretations of welfare-oriented legislation maximizes inequality reduction. These interpretations are most likely to be achieved through a combination of collective mobilization for strategic litigation in conjunction with sustained political mobilization from below both in society and in organizations, accompanied by the influence in implementation and also active monitoring by law and social science-savvy reformers representing the interests of disadvantaged classes and groups.

KW - Discrimination

KW - Economy

KW - Institutionalism

KW - Politics

KW - Rights

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149060204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149060204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112728

DO - 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112728

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38149060204

VL - 3

SP - 69

EP - 97

JO - Annual Review of Law and Social Science

JF - Annual Review of Law and Social Science

SN - 1550-3585

ER -