Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment: findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop

Peter Fantke, Olivier Jolliet, John S. Evans, Joshua S. Apte, Aaron J. Cohen, Otto O. Hänninen, Fintan Hurley, Matti J. Jantunen, Michael Jerrett, Jonathan I. Levy, Miranda M Loh, Julian D. Marshall, Brian G. Miller, Philipp Preiss, Joseph V. Spadaro, Marko Tainio, Jouni T. Tuomisto, Charles J. Weschler, Thomas E. McKone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Fine particulate matter (PM<inf>2.5</inf>) is considered to be one of the most important environmental factors contributing to the global human disease burden. However, due to the lack of broad consensus and harmonization in the life cycle assessment (LCA) community, there is no clear guidance on how to consistently include health effects from PM<inf>2.5</inf> exposure in LCA practice. As a consequence, different models are currently used to assess life cycle impacts for PM<inf>2.5</inf>, sometimes leading to inconsistent results. In a global effort initiated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative, respiratory inorganics’ impacts expressed as health effects from PM<inf>2.5</inf> exposure were selected as one of the initial impact categories to undergo review with the goal of providing global guidance for implementation in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). The goal of this paper is to summarize the current knowledge and practice for assessing health effects from PM<inf>2.5</inf> exposure and to provide recommendations for their consistent integration into LCIA.Methods: A task force on human health impacts was convened to build the framework for consistently quantifying health effects from PM<inf>2.5</inf> exposure and for recommending PM<inf>2.5</inf> characterization factors. In an initial Guidance Workshop, existing literature was reviewed and input from a broad range of internationally recognized experts was obtained and discussed. Workshop objectives were to identify the main scientific questions and challenges for quantifying health effects from PM<inf>2.5</inf> exposure and to provide initial guidance to the impact quantification process.Results and discussion: A set of 10 recommendations was developed addressing (a) the general framework for assessing PM<inf>2.5</inf>-related health effects, (b) approaches and data to estimate human exposure to PM<inf>2.5</inf> using intake fractions, and (c) approaches and data to characterize exposure-response functions (ERFs) for PM<inf>2.5</inf> and to quantify severity of the diseases attributed to PM<inf>2.5</inf> exposure. Despite these advances, a number of complex issues, such as those related to nonlinearity of the ERF and the possible need to provide different ERFs for use in different geographical regions, require further analysis.Conclusions and outlook: Questions of how to refine and improve the overall framework were analyzed. Data and models were proposed for harmonizing various elements of the health impact pathways for PM<inf>2.5</inf>. Within the next two years, our goal is to build a global guidance framework and to determine characterization factors that are more reliable for incorporating the health effects from exposure to PM<inf>2.5</inf> into LCIA. Ideally, this will allow quantification of the impacts of both indoor and outdoor exposures to PM<inf>2.5</inf>.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-288
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

particulate matter
life cycle
health impact
exposure
impact assessment
effect
health
United Nations Environment Program
geographical region
toxicology
nonlinearity
environmental factor

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Exposure-response function
  • Fine particulate matter
  • Global guidance
  • Human health effects
  • Intake fraction
  • Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment : findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop. / Fantke, Peter; Jolliet, Olivier; Evans, John S.; Apte, Joshua S.; Cohen, Aaron J.; Hänninen, Otto O.; Hurley, Fintan; Jantunen, Matti J.; Jerrett, Michael; Levy, Jonathan I.; Loh, Miranda M; Marshall, Julian D.; Miller, Brian G.; Preiss, Philipp; Spadaro, Joseph V.; Tainio, Marko; Tuomisto, Jouni T.; Weschler, Charles J.; McKone, Thomas E.

In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2015, p. 276-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fantke, P, Jolliet, O, Evans, JS, Apte, JS, Cohen, AJ, Hänninen, OO, Hurley, F, Jantunen, MJ, Jerrett, M, Levy, JI, Loh, MM, Marshall, JD, Miller, BG, Preiss, P, Spadaro, JV, Tainio, M, Tuomisto, JT, Weschler, CJ & McKone, TE 2015, 'Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment: findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop', International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 276-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0822-2
Fantke, Peter ; Jolliet, Olivier ; Evans, John S. ; Apte, Joshua S. ; Cohen, Aaron J. ; Hänninen, Otto O. ; Hurley, Fintan ; Jantunen, Matti J. ; Jerrett, Michael ; Levy, Jonathan I. ; Loh, Miranda M ; Marshall, Julian D. ; Miller, Brian G. ; Preiss, Philipp ; Spadaro, Joseph V. ; Tainio, Marko ; Tuomisto, Jouni T. ; Weschler, Charles J. ; McKone, Thomas E. / Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment : findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop. In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 276-288.
@article{805d5a6c71ad41959f5071d348e2ca96,
title = "Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment: findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop",
abstract = "Purpose: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is considered to be one of the most important environmental factors contributing to the global human disease burden. However, due to the lack of broad consensus and harmonization in the life cycle assessment (LCA) community, there is no clear guidance on how to consistently include health effects from PM2.5 exposure in LCA practice. As a consequence, different models are currently used to assess life cycle impacts for PM2.5, sometimes leading to inconsistent results. In a global effort initiated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative, respiratory inorganics’ impacts expressed as health effects from PM2.5 exposure were selected as one of the initial impact categories to undergo review with the goal of providing global guidance for implementation in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). The goal of this paper is to summarize the current knowledge and practice for assessing health effects from PM2.5 exposure and to provide recommendations for their consistent integration into LCIA.Methods: A task force on human health impacts was convened to build the framework for consistently quantifying health effects from PM2.5 exposure and for recommending PM2.5 characterization factors. In an initial Guidance Workshop, existing literature was reviewed and input from a broad range of internationally recognized experts was obtained and discussed. Workshop objectives were to identify the main scientific questions and challenges for quantifying health effects from PM2.5 exposure and to provide initial guidance to the impact quantification process.Results and discussion: A set of 10 recommendations was developed addressing (a) the general framework for assessing PM2.5-related health effects, (b) approaches and data to estimate human exposure to PM2.5 using intake fractions, and (c) approaches and data to characterize exposure-response functions (ERFs) for PM2.5 and to quantify severity of the diseases attributed to PM2.5 exposure. Despite these advances, a number of complex issues, such as those related to nonlinearity of the ERF and the possible need to provide different ERFs for use in different geographical regions, require further analysis.Conclusions and outlook: Questions of how to refine and improve the overall framework were analyzed. Data and models were proposed for harmonizing various elements of the health impact pathways for PM2.5. Within the next two years, our goal is to build a global guidance framework and to determine characterization factors that are more reliable for incorporating the health effects from exposure to PM2.5 into LCIA. Ideally, this will allow quantification of the impacts of both indoor and outdoor exposures to PM2.5.",
keywords = "Air pollution, Exposure-response function, Fine particulate matter, Global guidance, Human health effects, Intake fraction, Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)",
author = "Peter Fantke and Olivier Jolliet and Evans, {John S.} and Apte, {Joshua S.} and Cohen, {Aaron J.} and H{\"a}nninen, {Otto O.} and Fintan Hurley and Jantunen, {Matti J.} and Michael Jerrett and Levy, {Jonathan I.} and Loh, {Miranda M} and Marshall, {Julian D.} and Miller, {Brian G.} and Philipp Preiss and Spadaro, {Joseph V.} and Marko Tainio and Tuomisto, {Jouni T.} and Weschler, {Charles J.} and McKone, {Thomas E.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s11367-014-0822-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "276--288",
journal = "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment",
issn = "0948-3349",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment

T2 - findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop

AU - Fantke, Peter

AU - Jolliet, Olivier

AU - Evans, John S.

AU - Apte, Joshua S.

AU - Cohen, Aaron J.

AU - Hänninen, Otto O.

AU - Hurley, Fintan

AU - Jantunen, Matti J.

AU - Jerrett, Michael

AU - Levy, Jonathan I.

AU - Loh, Miranda M

AU - Marshall, Julian D.

AU - Miller, Brian G.

AU - Preiss, Philipp

AU - Spadaro, Joseph V.

AU - Tainio, Marko

AU - Tuomisto, Jouni T.

AU - Weschler, Charles J.

AU - McKone, Thomas E.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is considered to be one of the most important environmental factors contributing to the global human disease burden. However, due to the lack of broad consensus and harmonization in the life cycle assessment (LCA) community, there is no clear guidance on how to consistently include health effects from PM2.5 exposure in LCA practice. As a consequence, different models are currently used to assess life cycle impacts for PM2.5, sometimes leading to inconsistent results. In a global effort initiated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative, respiratory inorganics’ impacts expressed as health effects from PM2.5 exposure were selected as one of the initial impact categories to undergo review with the goal of providing global guidance for implementation in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). The goal of this paper is to summarize the current knowledge and practice for assessing health effects from PM2.5 exposure and to provide recommendations for their consistent integration into LCIA.Methods: A task force on human health impacts was convened to build the framework for consistently quantifying health effects from PM2.5 exposure and for recommending PM2.5 characterization factors. In an initial Guidance Workshop, existing literature was reviewed and input from a broad range of internationally recognized experts was obtained and discussed. Workshop objectives were to identify the main scientific questions and challenges for quantifying health effects from PM2.5 exposure and to provide initial guidance to the impact quantification process.Results and discussion: A set of 10 recommendations was developed addressing (a) the general framework for assessing PM2.5-related health effects, (b) approaches and data to estimate human exposure to PM2.5 using intake fractions, and (c) approaches and data to characterize exposure-response functions (ERFs) for PM2.5 and to quantify severity of the diseases attributed to PM2.5 exposure. Despite these advances, a number of complex issues, such as those related to nonlinearity of the ERF and the possible need to provide different ERFs for use in different geographical regions, require further analysis.Conclusions and outlook: Questions of how to refine and improve the overall framework were analyzed. Data and models were proposed for harmonizing various elements of the health impact pathways for PM2.5. Within the next two years, our goal is to build a global guidance framework and to determine characterization factors that are more reliable for incorporating the health effects from exposure to PM2.5 into LCIA. Ideally, this will allow quantification of the impacts of both indoor and outdoor exposures to PM2.5.

AB - Purpose: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is considered to be one of the most important environmental factors contributing to the global human disease burden. However, due to the lack of broad consensus and harmonization in the life cycle assessment (LCA) community, there is no clear guidance on how to consistently include health effects from PM2.5 exposure in LCA practice. As a consequence, different models are currently used to assess life cycle impacts for PM2.5, sometimes leading to inconsistent results. In a global effort initiated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative, respiratory inorganics’ impacts expressed as health effects from PM2.5 exposure were selected as one of the initial impact categories to undergo review with the goal of providing global guidance for implementation in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). The goal of this paper is to summarize the current knowledge and practice for assessing health effects from PM2.5 exposure and to provide recommendations for their consistent integration into LCIA.Methods: A task force on human health impacts was convened to build the framework for consistently quantifying health effects from PM2.5 exposure and for recommending PM2.5 characterization factors. In an initial Guidance Workshop, existing literature was reviewed and input from a broad range of internationally recognized experts was obtained and discussed. Workshop objectives were to identify the main scientific questions and challenges for quantifying health effects from PM2.5 exposure and to provide initial guidance to the impact quantification process.Results and discussion: A set of 10 recommendations was developed addressing (a) the general framework for assessing PM2.5-related health effects, (b) approaches and data to estimate human exposure to PM2.5 using intake fractions, and (c) approaches and data to characterize exposure-response functions (ERFs) for PM2.5 and to quantify severity of the diseases attributed to PM2.5 exposure. Despite these advances, a number of complex issues, such as those related to nonlinearity of the ERF and the possible need to provide different ERFs for use in different geographical regions, require further analysis.Conclusions and outlook: Questions of how to refine and improve the overall framework were analyzed. Data and models were proposed for harmonizing various elements of the health impact pathways for PM2.5. Within the next two years, our goal is to build a global guidance framework and to determine characterization factors that are more reliable for incorporating the health effects from exposure to PM2.5 into LCIA. Ideally, this will allow quantification of the impacts of both indoor and outdoor exposures to PM2.5.

KW - Air pollution

KW - Exposure-response function

KW - Fine particulate matter

KW - Global guidance

KW - Human health effects

KW - Intake fraction

KW - Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922101886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922101886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11367-014-0822-2

DO - 10.1007/s11367-014-0822-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922101886

VL - 20

SP - 276

EP - 288

JO - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

JF - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

SN - 0948-3349

IS - 2

ER -