Health information text characteristics.

Gondy Augusta Leroy, Evren Eryilmaz, Benjamin T. Laroya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Millions of people search online for medical text, but these texts are often too complicated to understand. Readability evaluations are mostly based on surface metrics such as character or words counts and sentence syntax, but content is ignored. We compared four types of documents, easy and difficult WebMD documents, patient blogs, and patient educational material, for surface and content-based metrics. The documents differed significantly in reading grade levels and vocabulary used. WebMD pages with high readability also used terminology that was more consumer-friendly. Moreover, difficult documents are harder to understand due to their grammar and word choice and because they discuss more difficult topics. This indicates that we can simplify many documents by focusing on word choice in addition to sentence structure, however, for difficult documents this may be insufficient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-483
Number of pages5
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Blogging
Vocabulary
Health
Terminology
Reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Health information text characteristics. / Leroy, Gondy Augusta; Eryilmaz, Evren; Laroya, Benjamin T.

In: AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium, 2006, p. 479-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ddfb5b101dc14074a1057708e1621a24,
title = "Health information text characteristics.",
abstract = "Millions of people search online for medical text, but these texts are often too complicated to understand. Readability evaluations are mostly based on surface metrics such as character or words counts and sentence syntax, but content is ignored. We compared four types of documents, easy and difficult WebMD documents, patient blogs, and patient educational material, for surface and content-based metrics. The documents differed significantly in reading grade levels and vocabulary used. WebMD pages with high readability also used terminology that was more consumer-friendly. Moreover, difficult documents are harder to understand due to their grammar and word choice and because they discuss more difficult topics. This indicates that we can simplify many documents by focusing on word choice in addition to sentence structure, however, for difficult documents this may be insufficient.",
author = "Leroy, {Gondy Augusta} and Evren Eryilmaz and Laroya, {Benjamin T.}",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "479--483",
journal = "AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium",
issn = "1559-4076",
publisher = "American Medical Informatics Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health information text characteristics.

AU - Leroy, Gondy Augusta

AU - Eryilmaz, Evren

AU - Laroya, Benjamin T.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Millions of people search online for medical text, but these texts are often too complicated to understand. Readability evaluations are mostly based on surface metrics such as character or words counts and sentence syntax, but content is ignored. We compared four types of documents, easy and difficult WebMD documents, patient blogs, and patient educational material, for surface and content-based metrics. The documents differed significantly in reading grade levels and vocabulary used. WebMD pages with high readability also used terminology that was more consumer-friendly. Moreover, difficult documents are harder to understand due to their grammar and word choice and because they discuss more difficult topics. This indicates that we can simplify many documents by focusing on word choice in addition to sentence structure, however, for difficult documents this may be insufficient.

AB - Millions of people search online for medical text, but these texts are often too complicated to understand. Readability evaluations are mostly based on surface metrics such as character or words counts and sentence syntax, but content is ignored. We compared four types of documents, easy and difficult WebMD documents, patient blogs, and patient educational material, for surface and content-based metrics. The documents differed significantly in reading grade levels and vocabulary used. WebMD pages with high readability also used terminology that was more consumer-friendly. Moreover, difficult documents are harder to understand due to their grammar and word choice and because they discuss more difficult topics. This indicates that we can simplify many documents by focusing on word choice in addition to sentence structure, however, for difficult documents this may be insufficient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34748893569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34748893569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17238387

AN - SCOPUS:34748893569

SP - 479

EP - 483

JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

SN - 1559-4076

ER -