Hearing conservation in high risk industries: Compliance with, and barriers to best practice in, workplace noise control

David McBride, Melanie L Bell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The last omnibus report on noise in New Zealand workplaces was carried out in 1984 when 15,957 workers in high noise-risk areas showed 6,493 (40%) were actually exposed above the exposure standard of 85 dB(A) and of the 3,700 (23%) who had audiometric screening, 15% had evidence (a loss at 4 kHz of 35 dB hearing at age 25 or 50 or more at any age) of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL).1 A recent review showed that the numbers of new claims incurring a cost to ACC in 2005-6 (5,580 cases) were approximately double the figure in 1995-1996 (2,823), and the costs of NIHL have been estimated as NZ$198.32 million since 1995.2 Despite knowledge of effective controls since the mid-80s, there is no evidence that the prevalence of the condition is decreasing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-215
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Health, Safety and Environment
Volume27
Issue number3
StatePublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Noise-Induced Hearing Loss
Practice Guidelines
Workplace
Hearing
Noise
Industry
Costs and Cost Analysis
New Zealand
Am 580

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{935fc8745d9f43b59837df96fa9ad54b,
title = "Hearing conservation in high risk industries: Compliance with, and barriers to best practice in, workplace noise control",
abstract = "The last omnibus report on noise in New Zealand workplaces was carried out in 1984 when 15,957 workers in high noise-risk areas showed 6,493 (40{\%}) were actually exposed above the exposure standard of 85 dB(A) and of the 3,700 (23{\%}) who had audiometric screening, 15{\%} had evidence (a loss at 4 kHz of 35 dB hearing at age 25 or 50 or more at any age) of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL).1 A recent review showed that the numbers of new claims incurring a cost to ACC in 2005-6 (5,580 cases) were approximately double the figure in 1995-1996 (2,823), and the costs of NIHL have been estimated as NZ$198.32 million since 1995.2 Despite knowledge of effective controls since the mid-80s, there is no evidence that the prevalence of the condition is decreasing.",
author = "David McBride and Bell, {Melanie L}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "209--215",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Health and Safety - Australia and New Zealand",
issn = "0815-6409",
publisher = "CCH Australia Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hearing conservation in high risk industries

T2 - Compliance with, and barriers to best practice in, workplace noise control

AU - McBride, David

AU - Bell, Melanie L

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - The last omnibus report on noise in New Zealand workplaces was carried out in 1984 when 15,957 workers in high noise-risk areas showed 6,493 (40%) were actually exposed above the exposure standard of 85 dB(A) and of the 3,700 (23%) who had audiometric screening, 15% had evidence (a loss at 4 kHz of 35 dB hearing at age 25 or 50 or more at any age) of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL).1 A recent review showed that the numbers of new claims incurring a cost to ACC in 2005-6 (5,580 cases) were approximately double the figure in 1995-1996 (2,823), and the costs of NIHL have been estimated as NZ$198.32 million since 1995.2 Despite knowledge of effective controls since the mid-80s, there is no evidence that the prevalence of the condition is decreasing.

AB - The last omnibus report on noise in New Zealand workplaces was carried out in 1984 when 15,957 workers in high noise-risk areas showed 6,493 (40%) were actually exposed above the exposure standard of 85 dB(A) and of the 3,700 (23%) who had audiometric screening, 15% had evidence (a loss at 4 kHz of 35 dB hearing at age 25 or 50 or more at any age) of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL).1 A recent review showed that the numbers of new claims incurring a cost to ACC in 2005-6 (5,580 cases) were approximately double the figure in 1995-1996 (2,823), and the costs of NIHL have been estimated as NZ$198.32 million since 1995.2 Despite knowledge of effective controls since the mid-80s, there is no evidence that the prevalence of the condition is decreasing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893528549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893528549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893528549

VL - 27

SP - 209

EP - 215

JO - Journal of Occupational Health and Safety - Australia and New Zealand

JF - Journal of Occupational Health and Safety - Australia and New Zealand

SN - 0815-6409

IS - 3

ER -