Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women

What does it add to conventional bone mineral density?

A. Z. LaCroix, T. J. Beck, J. A. Cauley, C. E. Lewis, Tamsen L Bassford, R. Jackson, G. Wu, Zhao Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hip geometry measurements of outer diameter and buckling ratio at the intertrochanter and shaft of the hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan predicted incident hip fracture in postmenopausal women. These associations, independent of age, body size, clinical risk factors, and conventional areal bone mineral density, suggest hip geometry plays a role in fracture etiology and may aid in improving identification of older women at high fracture risk. Introduction This study examined whether hip geometry parameters predicted hip fracture independent of body size, clinical risk factors, and conventional femoral neck bone mineral density (aBMD) and whether summary factors could be identified to predict hip fracture. Methods We studied 10,290 postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative. Eight thousand eight hundred forty-three remained fracture free during followup to 11 years of follow-up, while 147 fractured their hip, and 1,300 had other clinical fractures. Hip structural analysis software measured bone cross-sectional area, outer diameter, section modulus, average cortical thickness, and buckling ratio on archived DXA scans in three hip regions: narrow neck, intertrochanter, and shaft. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models for individual parameters and for composite factors extracted from principal components analysis from all 15 parameters. Results After adjustment for age, body size, clinical risk factors, and aBMD, intertrochanter and shaft outer diameter measurements remained independent predictors of hip fracture with hazard ratios for a one standard deviation increase of 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-2.08) for the intertrochanter and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.06-1.76) for the shaft. Average buckling ratios also independently predicted incident hip fracture with hazard ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.10-1.87) at the intertrochanter and 1.24 (95% CI, 1.00-1.55) at the shaft. Although two composite factors were extracted from principal components analysis, neither was superior to these individual measurements at predicting incident hip fracture. Conclusions Two hip geometry parameters, intertrochanter outer diameter and buckling ratio, predict incident hip fracture after accounting for clinical risk factors and aBMD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)919-929
Number of pages11
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Hip Fractures
Bone Density
Hip
Incidence
Body Size
Confidence Intervals
Photon Absorptiometry
Principal Component Analysis
Femur Neck
Women's Health
Proportional Hazards Models
Neck
Software
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Bone density
  • Bone strength
  • Hip fracture
  • Hip structural geometry
  • Prospective studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women : What does it add to conventional bone mineral density? / LaCroix, A. Z.; Beck, T. J.; Cauley, J. A.; Lewis, C. E.; Bassford, Tamsen L; Jackson, R.; Wu, G.; Chen, Zhao.

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 21, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 919-929.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e349c262a10340989bfdab5cf2427a04,
title = "Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: What does it add to conventional bone mineral density?",
abstract = "Hip geometry measurements of outer diameter and buckling ratio at the intertrochanter and shaft of the hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan predicted incident hip fracture in postmenopausal women. These associations, independent of age, body size, clinical risk factors, and conventional areal bone mineral density, suggest hip geometry plays a role in fracture etiology and may aid in improving identification of older women at high fracture risk. Introduction This study examined whether hip geometry parameters predicted hip fracture independent of body size, clinical risk factors, and conventional femoral neck bone mineral density (aBMD) and whether summary factors could be identified to predict hip fracture. Methods We studied 10,290 postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative. Eight thousand eight hundred forty-three remained fracture free during followup to 11 years of follow-up, while 147 fractured their hip, and 1,300 had other clinical fractures. Hip structural analysis software measured bone cross-sectional area, outer diameter, section modulus, average cortical thickness, and buckling ratio on archived DXA scans in three hip regions: narrow neck, intertrochanter, and shaft. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models for individual parameters and for composite factors extracted from principal components analysis from all 15 parameters. Results After adjustment for age, body size, clinical risk factors, and aBMD, intertrochanter and shaft outer diameter measurements remained independent predictors of hip fracture with hazard ratios for a one standard deviation increase of 1.61 (95{\%} confidence interval (CI), 1.25-2.08) for the intertrochanter and 1.36 (95{\%} CI, 1.06-1.76) for the shaft. Average buckling ratios also independently predicted incident hip fracture with hazard ratios of 1.43 (95{\%} CI, 1.10-1.87) at the intertrochanter and 1.24 (95{\%} CI, 1.00-1.55) at the shaft. Although two composite factors were extracted from principal components analysis, neither was superior to these individual measurements at predicting incident hip fracture. Conclusions Two hip geometry parameters, intertrochanter outer diameter and buckling ratio, predict incident hip fracture after accounting for clinical risk factors and aBMD.",
keywords = "Bone density, Bone strength, Hip fracture, Hip structural geometry, Prospective studies",
author = "LaCroix, {A. Z.} and Beck, {T. J.} and Cauley, {J. A.} and Lewis, {C. E.} and Bassford, {Tamsen L} and R. Jackson and G. Wu and Zhao Chen",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-009-1056-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "919--929",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women

T2 - What does it add to conventional bone mineral density?

AU - LaCroix, A. Z.

AU - Beck, T. J.

AU - Cauley, J. A.

AU - Lewis, C. E.

AU - Bassford, Tamsen L

AU - Jackson, R.

AU - Wu, G.

AU - Chen, Zhao

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Hip geometry measurements of outer diameter and buckling ratio at the intertrochanter and shaft of the hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan predicted incident hip fracture in postmenopausal women. These associations, independent of age, body size, clinical risk factors, and conventional areal bone mineral density, suggest hip geometry plays a role in fracture etiology and may aid in improving identification of older women at high fracture risk. Introduction This study examined whether hip geometry parameters predicted hip fracture independent of body size, clinical risk factors, and conventional femoral neck bone mineral density (aBMD) and whether summary factors could be identified to predict hip fracture. Methods We studied 10,290 postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative. Eight thousand eight hundred forty-three remained fracture free during followup to 11 years of follow-up, while 147 fractured their hip, and 1,300 had other clinical fractures. Hip structural analysis software measured bone cross-sectional area, outer diameter, section modulus, average cortical thickness, and buckling ratio on archived DXA scans in three hip regions: narrow neck, intertrochanter, and shaft. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models for individual parameters and for composite factors extracted from principal components analysis from all 15 parameters. Results After adjustment for age, body size, clinical risk factors, and aBMD, intertrochanter and shaft outer diameter measurements remained independent predictors of hip fracture with hazard ratios for a one standard deviation increase of 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-2.08) for the intertrochanter and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.06-1.76) for the shaft. Average buckling ratios also independently predicted incident hip fracture with hazard ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.10-1.87) at the intertrochanter and 1.24 (95% CI, 1.00-1.55) at the shaft. Although two composite factors were extracted from principal components analysis, neither was superior to these individual measurements at predicting incident hip fracture. Conclusions Two hip geometry parameters, intertrochanter outer diameter and buckling ratio, predict incident hip fracture after accounting for clinical risk factors and aBMD.

AB - Hip geometry measurements of outer diameter and buckling ratio at the intertrochanter and shaft of the hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan predicted incident hip fracture in postmenopausal women. These associations, independent of age, body size, clinical risk factors, and conventional areal bone mineral density, suggest hip geometry plays a role in fracture etiology and may aid in improving identification of older women at high fracture risk. Introduction This study examined whether hip geometry parameters predicted hip fracture independent of body size, clinical risk factors, and conventional femoral neck bone mineral density (aBMD) and whether summary factors could be identified to predict hip fracture. Methods We studied 10,290 postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative. Eight thousand eight hundred forty-three remained fracture free during followup to 11 years of follow-up, while 147 fractured their hip, and 1,300 had other clinical fractures. Hip structural analysis software measured bone cross-sectional area, outer diameter, section modulus, average cortical thickness, and buckling ratio on archived DXA scans in three hip regions: narrow neck, intertrochanter, and shaft. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models for individual parameters and for composite factors extracted from principal components analysis from all 15 parameters. Results After adjustment for age, body size, clinical risk factors, and aBMD, intertrochanter and shaft outer diameter measurements remained independent predictors of hip fracture with hazard ratios for a one standard deviation increase of 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-2.08) for the intertrochanter and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.06-1.76) for the shaft. Average buckling ratios also independently predicted incident hip fracture with hazard ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.10-1.87) at the intertrochanter and 1.24 (95% CI, 1.00-1.55) at the shaft. Although two composite factors were extracted from principal components analysis, neither was superior to these individual measurements at predicting incident hip fracture. Conclusions Two hip geometry parameters, intertrochanter outer diameter and buckling ratio, predict incident hip fracture after accounting for clinical risk factors and aBMD.

KW - Bone density

KW - Bone strength

KW - Hip fracture

KW - Hip structural geometry

KW - Prospective studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953007401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953007401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-009-1056-1

DO - 10.1007/s00198-009-1056-1

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 919

EP - 929

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 6

ER -