Hispanic and asian pubertal girls have higher android/gynoid fat ratio than whites

Rachel Novotny, Scott B Going, Dorothy Teegarden, Marta Van Loan, George McCabe, Linda McCabe, Yihe G. Daida, Carol J. Boushey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine differences in body size, composition, and distribution of body fat among Hispanic, white, and Asian adolescents. Research Methods and Procedures: This included crosssectional data from the baseline sample of the Adequate Calcium Today trial. Participants included 180 Asian, 234 Hispanic, and 325 white girls 11.8 ± 0.05 years of age from Arizona, California, Hawaii, Indiana, Ohio, and Nevada. Anthropometric and DXA measurements (Lunar Prodigy) were standardized across sites. Tanner pubertal stage was self-selected from line drawings. Physical activity was assessed by a validated questionnaire. Comparisons between ethnic groups were examined using contrasts in the context of a general linear model. Results: Controlling for pubertal stage and study site only, Asians weighed less than Hispanics and were shorter than Hispanics and whites. Controlling for pubertal stage, height, weight, and study site, Asians had shorter leg lengths, smaller waist circumference, longer trunk lengths, more lean mass, less total fat mass, and less gynoid fat mass than Hispanics and whites; Asians had larger bitrochanteric width than whites; Asians had smaller DXA-derived android fat mass than Hispanics; and whites had smaller mean android/gynoid fat ratio than Hispanics. However, whites had a smaller android/gynoid fat ratio than both Asians and Hispanics in a model that adjusted for ethnicity, pubertal stage, bitrochanteric width, waist circumference, trunk length, log of physical activity, and study site, which explained 77% of the variation. Discussion: Ethnic differences in fat distribution are partially explained by differences in skeletal dimensions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1565-1570
Number of pages6
JournalObesity
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

White Adipose Tissue
Hispanic Americans
Fats
Waist Circumference
Exercise
Body Fat Distribution
Body Size
Body Composition
Ethnic Groups
Linear Models
Leg
Calcium
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Body composition
  • Body fat distribution
  • DXA
  • Puberty
  • Race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Novotny, R., Going, S. B., Teegarden, D., Van Loan, M., McCabe, G., McCabe, L., ... Boushey, C. J. (2007). Hispanic and asian pubertal girls have higher android/gynoid fat ratio than whites. Obesity, 15(6), 1565-1570. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.185

Hispanic and asian pubertal girls have higher android/gynoid fat ratio than whites. / Novotny, Rachel; Going, Scott B; Teegarden, Dorothy; Van Loan, Marta; McCabe, George; McCabe, Linda; Daida, Yihe G.; Boushey, Carol J.

In: Obesity, Vol. 15, No. 6, 06.2007, p. 1565-1570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Novotny, R, Going, SB, Teegarden, D, Van Loan, M, McCabe, G, McCabe, L, Daida, YG & Boushey, CJ 2007, 'Hispanic and asian pubertal girls have higher android/gynoid fat ratio than whites', Obesity, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1565-1570. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.185
Novotny R, Going SB, Teegarden D, Van Loan M, McCabe G, McCabe L et al. Hispanic and asian pubertal girls have higher android/gynoid fat ratio than whites. Obesity. 2007 Jun;15(6):1565-1570. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.185
Novotny, Rachel ; Going, Scott B ; Teegarden, Dorothy ; Van Loan, Marta ; McCabe, George ; McCabe, Linda ; Daida, Yihe G. ; Boushey, Carol J. / Hispanic and asian pubertal girls have higher android/gynoid fat ratio than whites. In: Obesity. 2007 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 1565-1570.
@article{27382474b56c4d1d9a68fb8b584aaac2,
title = "Hispanic and asian pubertal girls have higher android/gynoid fat ratio than whites",
abstract = "Objective: To examine differences in body size, composition, and distribution of body fat among Hispanic, white, and Asian adolescents. Research Methods and Procedures: This included crosssectional data from the baseline sample of the Adequate Calcium Today trial. Participants included 180 Asian, 234 Hispanic, and 325 white girls 11.8 ± 0.05 years of age from Arizona, California, Hawaii, Indiana, Ohio, and Nevada. Anthropometric and DXA measurements (Lunar Prodigy) were standardized across sites. Tanner pubertal stage was self-selected from line drawings. Physical activity was assessed by a validated questionnaire. Comparisons between ethnic groups were examined using contrasts in the context of a general linear model. Results: Controlling for pubertal stage and study site only, Asians weighed less than Hispanics and were shorter than Hispanics and whites. Controlling for pubertal stage, height, weight, and study site, Asians had shorter leg lengths, smaller waist circumference, longer trunk lengths, more lean mass, less total fat mass, and less gynoid fat mass than Hispanics and whites; Asians had larger bitrochanteric width than whites; Asians had smaller DXA-derived android fat mass than Hispanics; and whites had smaller mean android/gynoid fat ratio than Hispanics. However, whites had a smaller android/gynoid fat ratio than both Asians and Hispanics in a model that adjusted for ethnicity, pubertal stage, bitrochanteric width, waist circumference, trunk length, log of physical activity, and study site, which explained 77{\%} of the variation. Discussion: Ethnic differences in fat distribution are partially explained by differences in skeletal dimensions.",
keywords = "Body composition, Body fat distribution, DXA, Puberty, Race",
author = "Rachel Novotny and Going, {Scott B} and Dorothy Teegarden and {Van Loan}, Marta and George McCabe and Linda McCabe and Daida, {Yihe G.} and Boushey, {Carol J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1038/oby.2007.185",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1565--1570",
journal = "Obesity",
issn = "1930-7381",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hispanic and asian pubertal girls have higher android/gynoid fat ratio than whites

AU - Novotny, Rachel

AU - Going, Scott B

AU - Teegarden, Dorothy

AU - Van Loan, Marta

AU - McCabe, George

AU - McCabe, Linda

AU - Daida, Yihe G.

AU - Boushey, Carol J.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Objective: To examine differences in body size, composition, and distribution of body fat among Hispanic, white, and Asian adolescents. Research Methods and Procedures: This included crosssectional data from the baseline sample of the Adequate Calcium Today trial. Participants included 180 Asian, 234 Hispanic, and 325 white girls 11.8 ± 0.05 years of age from Arizona, California, Hawaii, Indiana, Ohio, and Nevada. Anthropometric and DXA measurements (Lunar Prodigy) were standardized across sites. Tanner pubertal stage was self-selected from line drawings. Physical activity was assessed by a validated questionnaire. Comparisons between ethnic groups were examined using contrasts in the context of a general linear model. Results: Controlling for pubertal stage and study site only, Asians weighed less than Hispanics and were shorter than Hispanics and whites. Controlling for pubertal stage, height, weight, and study site, Asians had shorter leg lengths, smaller waist circumference, longer trunk lengths, more lean mass, less total fat mass, and less gynoid fat mass than Hispanics and whites; Asians had larger bitrochanteric width than whites; Asians had smaller DXA-derived android fat mass than Hispanics; and whites had smaller mean android/gynoid fat ratio than Hispanics. However, whites had a smaller android/gynoid fat ratio than both Asians and Hispanics in a model that adjusted for ethnicity, pubertal stage, bitrochanteric width, waist circumference, trunk length, log of physical activity, and study site, which explained 77% of the variation. Discussion: Ethnic differences in fat distribution are partially explained by differences in skeletal dimensions.

AB - Objective: To examine differences in body size, composition, and distribution of body fat among Hispanic, white, and Asian adolescents. Research Methods and Procedures: This included crosssectional data from the baseline sample of the Adequate Calcium Today trial. Participants included 180 Asian, 234 Hispanic, and 325 white girls 11.8 ± 0.05 years of age from Arizona, California, Hawaii, Indiana, Ohio, and Nevada. Anthropometric and DXA measurements (Lunar Prodigy) were standardized across sites. Tanner pubertal stage was self-selected from line drawings. Physical activity was assessed by a validated questionnaire. Comparisons between ethnic groups were examined using contrasts in the context of a general linear model. Results: Controlling for pubertal stage and study site only, Asians weighed less than Hispanics and were shorter than Hispanics and whites. Controlling for pubertal stage, height, weight, and study site, Asians had shorter leg lengths, smaller waist circumference, longer trunk lengths, more lean mass, less total fat mass, and less gynoid fat mass than Hispanics and whites; Asians had larger bitrochanteric width than whites; Asians had smaller DXA-derived android fat mass than Hispanics; and whites had smaller mean android/gynoid fat ratio than Hispanics. However, whites had a smaller android/gynoid fat ratio than both Asians and Hispanics in a model that adjusted for ethnicity, pubertal stage, bitrochanteric width, waist circumference, trunk length, log of physical activity, and study site, which explained 77% of the variation. Discussion: Ethnic differences in fat distribution are partially explained by differences in skeletal dimensions.

KW - Body composition

KW - Body fat distribution

KW - DXA

KW - Puberty

KW - Race

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547235624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547235624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/oby.2007.185

DO - 10.1038/oby.2007.185

M3 - Article

C2 - 17557994

AN - SCOPUS:34547235624

VL - 15

SP - 1565

EP - 1570

JO - Obesity

JF - Obesity

SN - 1930-7381

IS - 6

ER -