Histologic dating of the endometrium: Accuracy, reproducibility, and practical value

Oluwole Fadare, Wenxin - Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The continued use of the endometrial biopsy for the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and in the general evaluation of the infertile couple is based largely on tradition, the absence of a clearly superior diagnostic modality, the absence of studies that have either validated or repudiated its efficacy with certainty, its ability to assess the endometrial response irrespective of endogenous progesterone levels, its ability to monitor the endometrial response to hormonal therapy in fertility treatments, and, finally, its ability to exclude other intrinsic endometrial anomalies that may be detrimental to the implantation of the conceptus, such as chronic endometritis or neoplasia. However, the intra- and interobserver variability inherent in dating the product of the endometrial biopsy-the endometrium-has led to the current situation, in which, in approximately 20% of cases, variability attributed to the pathologist alone is determinant of whether a given biopsy in "in phase" or out of phase (ie, an assigned postovulatory date that is at least 2 days behind the chronologic date). Thus, studies that clearly delineate which histologic parameters serve as the greatest source of disagreement for pathologists provide a valuable framework for further refinement of the criteria for endometrial dating. Meanwhile, continued use of the criteria of Noyes et al for endometrial dating is recommended until more precise modalities for assessing the adequacy of endometrial maturation are available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-46
Number of pages8
JournalAdvances in Anatomic Pathology
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endometrium
Biopsy
Endometritis
Observer Variation
Luteal Phase
Progesterone
Fertility
Therapeutics
Neoplasms
Pathologists

Keywords

  • Endometrial biopsy
  • Endometrial dating
  • Infertility
  • Luteal phase defect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Anatomy

Cite this

Histologic dating of the endometrium : Accuracy, reproducibility, and practical value. / Fadare, Oluwole; Zheng, Wenxin -.

In: Advances in Anatomic Pathology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 03.2005, p. 39-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28350d3ddae24ab4a9431ea8e5f06adc,
title = "Histologic dating of the endometrium: Accuracy, reproducibility, and practical value",
abstract = "The continued use of the endometrial biopsy for the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and in the general evaluation of the infertile couple is based largely on tradition, the absence of a clearly superior diagnostic modality, the absence of studies that have either validated or repudiated its efficacy with certainty, its ability to assess the endometrial response irrespective of endogenous progesterone levels, its ability to monitor the endometrial response to hormonal therapy in fertility treatments, and, finally, its ability to exclude other intrinsic endometrial anomalies that may be detrimental to the implantation of the conceptus, such as chronic endometritis or neoplasia. However, the intra- and interobserver variability inherent in dating the product of the endometrial biopsy-the endometrium-has led to the current situation, in which, in approximately 20{\%} of cases, variability attributed to the pathologist alone is determinant of whether a given biopsy in {"}in phase{"} or out of phase (ie, an assigned postovulatory date that is at least 2 days behind the chronologic date). Thus, studies that clearly delineate which histologic parameters serve as the greatest source of disagreement for pathologists provide a valuable framework for further refinement of the criteria for endometrial dating. Meanwhile, continued use of the criteria of Noyes et al for endometrial dating is recommended until more precise modalities for assessing the adequacy of endometrial maturation are available.",
keywords = "Endometrial biopsy, Endometrial dating, Infertility, Luteal phase defect",
author = "Oluwole Fadare and Zheng, {Wenxin -}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/01.pap.0000155051.91366.bf",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "39--46",
journal = "Advances in Anatomic Pathology",
issn = "1072-4109",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histologic dating of the endometrium

T2 - Accuracy, reproducibility, and practical value

AU - Fadare, Oluwole

AU - Zheng, Wenxin -

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - The continued use of the endometrial biopsy for the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and in the general evaluation of the infertile couple is based largely on tradition, the absence of a clearly superior diagnostic modality, the absence of studies that have either validated or repudiated its efficacy with certainty, its ability to assess the endometrial response irrespective of endogenous progesterone levels, its ability to monitor the endometrial response to hormonal therapy in fertility treatments, and, finally, its ability to exclude other intrinsic endometrial anomalies that may be detrimental to the implantation of the conceptus, such as chronic endometritis or neoplasia. However, the intra- and interobserver variability inherent in dating the product of the endometrial biopsy-the endometrium-has led to the current situation, in which, in approximately 20% of cases, variability attributed to the pathologist alone is determinant of whether a given biopsy in "in phase" or out of phase (ie, an assigned postovulatory date that is at least 2 days behind the chronologic date). Thus, studies that clearly delineate which histologic parameters serve as the greatest source of disagreement for pathologists provide a valuable framework for further refinement of the criteria for endometrial dating. Meanwhile, continued use of the criteria of Noyes et al for endometrial dating is recommended until more precise modalities for assessing the adequacy of endometrial maturation are available.

AB - The continued use of the endometrial biopsy for the diagnosis of luteal phase defects (LPDs) and in the general evaluation of the infertile couple is based largely on tradition, the absence of a clearly superior diagnostic modality, the absence of studies that have either validated or repudiated its efficacy with certainty, its ability to assess the endometrial response irrespective of endogenous progesterone levels, its ability to monitor the endometrial response to hormonal therapy in fertility treatments, and, finally, its ability to exclude other intrinsic endometrial anomalies that may be detrimental to the implantation of the conceptus, such as chronic endometritis or neoplasia. However, the intra- and interobserver variability inherent in dating the product of the endometrial biopsy-the endometrium-has led to the current situation, in which, in approximately 20% of cases, variability attributed to the pathologist alone is determinant of whether a given biopsy in "in phase" or out of phase (ie, an assigned postovulatory date that is at least 2 days behind the chronologic date). Thus, studies that clearly delineate which histologic parameters serve as the greatest source of disagreement for pathologists provide a valuable framework for further refinement of the criteria for endometrial dating. Meanwhile, continued use of the criteria of Noyes et al for endometrial dating is recommended until more precise modalities for assessing the adequacy of endometrial maturation are available.

KW - Endometrial biopsy

KW - Endometrial dating

KW - Infertility

KW - Luteal phase defect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17144415590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17144415590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.pap.0000155051.91366.bf

DO - 10.1097/01.pap.0000155051.91366.bf

M3 - Article

C2 - 15731571

AN - SCOPUS:17144415590

VL - 12

SP - 39

EP - 46

JO - Advances in Anatomic Pathology

JF - Advances in Anatomic Pathology

SN - 1072-4109

IS - 2

ER -