Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness

John J Wiens, Michael J. Donoghue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

966 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecology and historical (phylogeny-based) biogeography have much to offer one another, but exchanges between these fields have been limited. Historical biogeography has become narrowly focused on using phylogenies to discover the history of geological connections among regions. Conversely, ecologists often ignore historical biogeography, even when its input can be crucial. Both historical biogeographers and ecologists have more-or-less abandoned attempts to understand the processes that determine the large-scale distribution of clades. Here, we describe the chasm that has developed between ecology and historical biogeography, some of the important questions that have fallen into it and how it might be bridged. To illustrate the benefits of an integrated approach, we expand on a model that can help explain the latitudinal gradient of species richness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-644
Number of pages6
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume19
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

biogeography
species richness
ecology
species diversity
ecologists
phylogeny
latitudinal gradient
integrated approach
history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. / Wiens, John J; Donoghue, Michael J.

In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 19, No. 12, 12.2004, p. 639-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiens, John J ; Donoghue, Michael J. / Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 12. pp. 639-644.
@article{d9c5a8da64ed4488ab72afb683fe7cde,
title = "Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness",
abstract = "Ecology and historical (phylogeny-based) biogeography have much to offer one another, but exchanges between these fields have been limited. Historical biogeography has become narrowly focused on using phylogenies to discover the history of geological connections among regions. Conversely, ecologists often ignore historical biogeography, even when its input can be crucial. Both historical biogeographers and ecologists have more-or-less abandoned attempts to understand the processes that determine the large-scale distribution of clades. Here, we describe the chasm that has developed between ecology and historical biogeography, some of the important questions that have fallen into it and how it might be bridged. To illustrate the benefits of an integrated approach, we expand on a model that can help explain the latitudinal gradient of species richness.",
author = "Wiens, {John J} and Donoghue, {Michael J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "639--644",
journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness

AU - Wiens, John J

AU - Donoghue, Michael J.

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Ecology and historical (phylogeny-based) biogeography have much to offer one another, but exchanges between these fields have been limited. Historical biogeography has become narrowly focused on using phylogenies to discover the history of geological connections among regions. Conversely, ecologists often ignore historical biogeography, even when its input can be crucial. Both historical biogeographers and ecologists have more-or-less abandoned attempts to understand the processes that determine the large-scale distribution of clades. Here, we describe the chasm that has developed between ecology and historical biogeography, some of the important questions that have fallen into it and how it might be bridged. To illustrate the benefits of an integrated approach, we expand on a model that can help explain the latitudinal gradient of species richness.

AB - Ecology and historical (phylogeny-based) biogeography have much to offer one another, but exchanges between these fields have been limited. Historical biogeography has become narrowly focused on using phylogenies to discover the history of geological connections among regions. Conversely, ecologists often ignore historical biogeography, even when its input can be crucial. Both historical biogeographers and ecologists have more-or-less abandoned attempts to understand the processes that determine the large-scale distribution of clades. Here, we describe the chasm that has developed between ecology and historical biogeography, some of the important questions that have fallen into it and how it might be bridged. To illustrate the benefits of an integrated approach, we expand on a model that can help explain the latitudinal gradient of species richness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8144220848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8144220848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 16701326

AN - SCOPUS:8144220848

VL - 19

SP - 639

EP - 644

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 12

ER -