HIV prevention and street-based male sex workers

An evaluation of brief interventions

Mark L. Williams, Anne Markey Bowen, Sandra C. Timpson, Michael W. Ross, John S. Atkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability and the comparative efficacy of brief HIV risk reduction interventions to increase condom use during paid anal sex by street-based male sex workers (MSWs). Of the 399 street-based MSWs who participated in the evaluation of acceptability, 112 participated in the evaluation of efficacy. Acceptability was evaluated by assessing completion rates. Intervention efficacy was assessed across two brief interventions, a "standard" and a "standard-plus" interventions. The primary outcome of concern was condom use during paid anal sexual encounters. In addition to this variable, changes in drug use, needle use, condom use beliefs, and condom use intention were also assessed. Results showed that almost two thirds of MSWs enrolled in a brief intervention completed it. Completion rates varied by age, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and HIV status. Condom use during paid anal sex increased postintervention. In addition, condom use intentions, positive condom use outcome expectations, and condom use normative expectations increased preintervention to postintervention. However, there were no significant differences between the standard and the standard-plus brief interventions in any of the outcomes measured. Brief interventions to reduce the HIV risks are acceptable to MSWs and are efficacious for reducing unprotected anal sex during paid sexual encounters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)204-215
Number of pages12
JournalAIDS Education and Prevention
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sex Workers
Condoms
HIV
worker
evaluation
Sexual Behavior
Unsafe Sex
sexual orientation
Risk Reduction Behavior
drug use
Needles
ethnicity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

HIV prevention and street-based male sex workers : An evaluation of brief interventions. / Williams, Mark L.; Bowen, Anne Markey; Timpson, Sandra C.; Ross, Michael W.; Atkinson, John S.

In: AIDS Education and Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2006, p. 204-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Mark L. ; Bowen, Anne Markey ; Timpson, Sandra C. ; Ross, Michael W. ; Atkinson, John S. / HIV prevention and street-based male sex workers : An evaluation of brief interventions. In: AIDS Education and Prevention. 2006 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 204-215.
@article{3df9bebee9684d61af577a5e692bafe7,
title = "HIV prevention and street-based male sex workers: An evaluation of brief interventions",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability and the comparative efficacy of brief HIV risk reduction interventions to increase condom use during paid anal sex by street-based male sex workers (MSWs). Of the 399 street-based MSWs who participated in the evaluation of acceptability, 112 participated in the evaluation of efficacy. Acceptability was evaluated by assessing completion rates. Intervention efficacy was assessed across two brief interventions, a {"}standard{"} and a {"}standard-plus{"} interventions. The primary outcome of concern was condom use during paid anal sexual encounters. In addition to this variable, changes in drug use, needle use, condom use beliefs, and condom use intention were also assessed. Results showed that almost two thirds of MSWs enrolled in a brief intervention completed it. Completion rates varied by age, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and HIV status. Condom use during paid anal sex increased postintervention. In addition, condom use intentions, positive condom use outcome expectations, and condom use normative expectations increased preintervention to postintervention. However, there were no significant differences between the standard and the standard-plus brief interventions in any of the outcomes measured. Brief interventions to reduce the HIV risks are acceptable to MSWs and are efficacious for reducing unprotected anal sex during paid sexual encounters.",
author = "Williams, {Mark L.} and Bowen, {Anne Markey} and Timpson, {Sandra C.} and Ross, {Michael W.} and Atkinson, {John S.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1521/aeap.2006.18.3.204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "204--215",
journal = "AIDS Education and Prevention",
issn = "0899-9546",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - HIV prevention and street-based male sex workers

T2 - An evaluation of brief interventions

AU - Williams, Mark L.

AU - Bowen, Anne Markey

AU - Timpson, Sandra C.

AU - Ross, Michael W.

AU - Atkinson, John S.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability and the comparative efficacy of brief HIV risk reduction interventions to increase condom use during paid anal sex by street-based male sex workers (MSWs). Of the 399 street-based MSWs who participated in the evaluation of acceptability, 112 participated in the evaluation of efficacy. Acceptability was evaluated by assessing completion rates. Intervention efficacy was assessed across two brief interventions, a "standard" and a "standard-plus" interventions. The primary outcome of concern was condom use during paid anal sexual encounters. In addition to this variable, changes in drug use, needle use, condom use beliefs, and condom use intention were also assessed. Results showed that almost two thirds of MSWs enrolled in a brief intervention completed it. Completion rates varied by age, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and HIV status. Condom use during paid anal sex increased postintervention. In addition, condom use intentions, positive condom use outcome expectations, and condom use normative expectations increased preintervention to postintervention. However, there were no significant differences between the standard and the standard-plus brief interventions in any of the outcomes measured. Brief interventions to reduce the HIV risks are acceptable to MSWs and are efficacious for reducing unprotected anal sex during paid sexual encounters.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability and the comparative efficacy of brief HIV risk reduction interventions to increase condom use during paid anal sex by street-based male sex workers (MSWs). Of the 399 street-based MSWs who participated in the evaluation of acceptability, 112 participated in the evaluation of efficacy. Acceptability was evaluated by assessing completion rates. Intervention efficacy was assessed across two brief interventions, a "standard" and a "standard-plus" interventions. The primary outcome of concern was condom use during paid anal sexual encounters. In addition to this variable, changes in drug use, needle use, condom use beliefs, and condom use intention were also assessed. Results showed that almost two thirds of MSWs enrolled in a brief intervention completed it. Completion rates varied by age, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and HIV status. Condom use during paid anal sex increased postintervention. In addition, condom use intentions, positive condom use outcome expectations, and condom use normative expectations increased preintervention to postintervention. However, there were no significant differences between the standard and the standard-plus brief interventions in any of the outcomes measured. Brief interventions to reduce the HIV risks are acceptable to MSWs and are efficacious for reducing unprotected anal sex during paid sexual encounters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745153837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745153837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/aeap.2006.18.3.204

DO - 10.1521/aeap.2006.18.3.204

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 204

EP - 215

JO - AIDS Education and Prevention

JF - AIDS Education and Prevention

SN - 0899-9546

IS - 3

ER -