Hormone mimics and disrupted bodies

Social worlds analysis of a scientific controversy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article offers a social worlds analysis of an emergent and contested scientific paradigm: hormone disruption. It has been argued that humans and wildlife are suffering from health problems resulting from exposure to synthetic chemicals in the environment that mimic natural hormones. Many different social worlds are focused on understanding, expanding, and challenging the concept of hormone disruption, and there is considerable technical and political controversy surrounding this new approach. Using a social worlds analysis, we map the activities of and interactions among some of the communities interested in this paradigm. We pay special attention to the implicated actors involved in-or left out of-the hormone disrupter debates, arguing that it is not enough to ask in the pragmatist sense "loho cares" about social phenomena; instead, we must ask "who has the tools and the ability to care" about a certain issue and thus to participate meaningfully in various social ii'orlds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSociological Perspectives
Volume43
Issue number4 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

paradigm
ability
interaction
health
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Hormone mimics and disrupted bodies : Social worlds analysis of a scientific controversy. / Casper, Monica J.

In: Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 43, No. 4 SUPPL., 2000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{095fbdab641b4fe19228da93883a72bf,
title = "Hormone mimics and disrupted bodies: Social worlds analysis of a scientific controversy",
abstract = "This article offers a social worlds analysis of an emergent and contested scientific paradigm: hormone disruption. It has been argued that humans and wildlife are suffering from health problems resulting from exposure to synthetic chemicals in the environment that mimic natural hormones. Many different social worlds are focused on understanding, expanding, and challenging the concept of hormone disruption, and there is considerable technical and political controversy surrounding this new approach. Using a social worlds analysis, we map the activities of and interactions among some of the communities interested in this paradigm. We pay special attention to the implicated actors involved in-or left out of-the hormone disrupter debates, arguing that it is not enough to ask in the pragmatist sense {"}loho cares{"} about social phenomena; instead, we must ask {"}who has the tools and the ability to care{"} about a certain issue and thus to participate meaningfully in various social ii'orlds.",
author = "Casper, {Monica J}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
journal = "Sociological Perspectives",
issn = "0731-1214",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hormone mimics and disrupted bodies

T2 - Social worlds analysis of a scientific controversy

AU - Casper, Monica J

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - This article offers a social worlds analysis of an emergent and contested scientific paradigm: hormone disruption. It has been argued that humans and wildlife are suffering from health problems resulting from exposure to synthetic chemicals in the environment that mimic natural hormones. Many different social worlds are focused on understanding, expanding, and challenging the concept of hormone disruption, and there is considerable technical and political controversy surrounding this new approach. Using a social worlds analysis, we map the activities of and interactions among some of the communities interested in this paradigm. We pay special attention to the implicated actors involved in-or left out of-the hormone disrupter debates, arguing that it is not enough to ask in the pragmatist sense "loho cares" about social phenomena; instead, we must ask "who has the tools and the ability to care" about a certain issue and thus to participate meaningfully in various social ii'orlds.

AB - This article offers a social worlds analysis of an emergent and contested scientific paradigm: hormone disruption. It has been argued that humans and wildlife are suffering from health problems resulting from exposure to synthetic chemicals in the environment that mimic natural hormones. Many different social worlds are focused on understanding, expanding, and challenging the concept of hormone disruption, and there is considerable technical and political controversy surrounding this new approach. Using a social worlds analysis, we map the activities of and interactions among some of the communities interested in this paradigm. We pay special attention to the implicated actors involved in-or left out of-the hormone disrupter debates, arguing that it is not enough to ask in the pragmatist sense "loho cares" about social phenomena; instead, we must ask "who has the tools and the ability to care" about a certain issue and thus to participate meaningfully in various social ii'orlds.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144434506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144434506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 43

JO - Sociological Perspectives

JF - Sociological Perspectives

SN - 0731-1214

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -