“Horned cattle and pack horses”

zooarchaeological legacy collections from the unauthorized (and unscreened) Spanish Fort

Barnet Pavao-Zuckerman, Tracie Mayfield, Chance Copperstone, H. Thomas Foster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 1689, the governor of La Florida ordered the construction of a fort near the Muscogee (Creek) ancestral community of Apalachicola, supplying it with a caravan of “horned cattle and pack horses.” The fort, referred to as “Spanish Fort,” was abandoned a year later. Archaeological investigations of the fort were carried out in 1960 without sieving, and a large collection of faunal remains was minimally studied. Despite the limitations of the recovery methods, a recent analysis of these zooarchaeological legacy collections provides insight into the provisioning strategies of the Spanish military 150 years after initial colonialism began. Spanish Fort was better provisioned than its predecessors, such as Fort San Juan, but with a limited range of domesticated livestock—only cattle and horses. The presidio may have traded with the Apalachicola community in order to diversify their diet, but butchering marks indicate that the presidio’s soldiers processed their own meat at the fort. Having learned hard lessons from earlier colonial expeditions, Spanish military colonialists minimized the outpost’s vulnerability by not relying heavily on the local Native American population, while building a transactional relationship with Apalachicola to ensure the community’s cooperation. The zooarchaeological materials from Spanish Fort also indicate that the fort was intentionally destroyed by fire, providing a glimpse of Spanish adaptive strategies as the mission of securing the inland Southeast from rival colonialism abruptly ended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-203
Number of pages14
JournalSoutheastern Archaeology
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

colonial age
Military
soldier
community
vulnerability

Keywords

  • colonialism
  • seventeenth century
  • southeastern North America
  • Zooarchaeology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology

Cite this

“Horned cattle and pack horses” : zooarchaeological legacy collections from the unauthorized (and unscreened) Spanish Fort. / Pavao-Zuckerman, Barnet; Mayfield, Tracie; Copperstone, Chance; Foster, H. Thomas.

In: Southeastern Archaeology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 02.09.2018, p. 190-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5cad16e7b9f7455eabb156a385c726dd,
title = "“Horned cattle and pack horses”: zooarchaeological legacy collections from the unauthorized (and unscreened) Spanish Fort",
abstract = "In 1689, the governor of La Florida ordered the construction of a fort near the Muscogee (Creek) ancestral community of Apalachicola, supplying it with a caravan of “horned cattle and pack horses.” The fort, referred to as “Spanish Fort,” was abandoned a year later. Archaeological investigations of the fort were carried out in 1960 without sieving, and a large collection of faunal remains was minimally studied. Despite the limitations of the recovery methods, a recent analysis of these zooarchaeological legacy collections provides insight into the provisioning strategies of the Spanish military 150 years after initial colonialism began. Spanish Fort was better provisioned than its predecessors, such as Fort San Juan, but with a limited range of domesticated livestock—only cattle and horses. The presidio may have traded with the Apalachicola community in order to diversify their diet, but butchering marks indicate that the presidio’s soldiers processed their own meat at the fort. Having learned hard lessons from earlier colonial expeditions, Spanish military colonialists minimized the outpost’s vulnerability by not relying heavily on the local Native American population, while building a transactional relationship with Apalachicola to ensure the community’s cooperation. The zooarchaeological materials from Spanish Fort also indicate that the fort was intentionally destroyed by fire, providing a glimpse of Spanish adaptive strategies as the mission of securing the inland Southeast from rival colonialism abruptly ended.",
keywords = "colonialism, seventeenth century, southeastern North America, Zooarchaeology",
author = "Barnet Pavao-Zuckerman and Tracie Mayfield and Chance Copperstone and Foster, {H. Thomas}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0734578X.2018.1459133",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "190--203",
journal = "Southeastern Archaeology",
issn = "0734-578X",
publisher = "Southeastern Archaeological Conference",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Horned cattle and pack horses”

T2 - zooarchaeological legacy collections from the unauthorized (and unscreened) Spanish Fort

AU - Pavao-Zuckerman, Barnet

AU - Mayfield, Tracie

AU - Copperstone, Chance

AU - Foster, H. Thomas

PY - 2018/9/2

Y1 - 2018/9/2

N2 - In 1689, the governor of La Florida ordered the construction of a fort near the Muscogee (Creek) ancestral community of Apalachicola, supplying it with a caravan of “horned cattle and pack horses.” The fort, referred to as “Spanish Fort,” was abandoned a year later. Archaeological investigations of the fort were carried out in 1960 without sieving, and a large collection of faunal remains was minimally studied. Despite the limitations of the recovery methods, a recent analysis of these zooarchaeological legacy collections provides insight into the provisioning strategies of the Spanish military 150 years after initial colonialism began. Spanish Fort was better provisioned than its predecessors, such as Fort San Juan, but with a limited range of domesticated livestock—only cattle and horses. The presidio may have traded with the Apalachicola community in order to diversify their diet, but butchering marks indicate that the presidio’s soldiers processed their own meat at the fort. Having learned hard lessons from earlier colonial expeditions, Spanish military colonialists minimized the outpost’s vulnerability by not relying heavily on the local Native American population, while building a transactional relationship with Apalachicola to ensure the community’s cooperation. The zooarchaeological materials from Spanish Fort also indicate that the fort was intentionally destroyed by fire, providing a glimpse of Spanish adaptive strategies as the mission of securing the inland Southeast from rival colonialism abruptly ended.

AB - In 1689, the governor of La Florida ordered the construction of a fort near the Muscogee (Creek) ancestral community of Apalachicola, supplying it with a caravan of “horned cattle and pack horses.” The fort, referred to as “Spanish Fort,” was abandoned a year later. Archaeological investigations of the fort were carried out in 1960 without sieving, and a large collection of faunal remains was minimally studied. Despite the limitations of the recovery methods, a recent analysis of these zooarchaeological legacy collections provides insight into the provisioning strategies of the Spanish military 150 years after initial colonialism began. Spanish Fort was better provisioned than its predecessors, such as Fort San Juan, but with a limited range of domesticated livestock—only cattle and horses. The presidio may have traded with the Apalachicola community in order to diversify their diet, but butchering marks indicate that the presidio’s soldiers processed their own meat at the fort. Having learned hard lessons from earlier colonial expeditions, Spanish military colonialists minimized the outpost’s vulnerability by not relying heavily on the local Native American population, while building a transactional relationship with Apalachicola to ensure the community’s cooperation. The zooarchaeological materials from Spanish Fort also indicate that the fort was intentionally destroyed by fire, providing a glimpse of Spanish adaptive strategies as the mission of securing the inland Southeast from rival colonialism abruptly ended.

KW - colonialism

KW - seventeenth century

KW - southeastern North America

KW - Zooarchaeology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055354796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055354796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0734578X.2018.1459133

DO - 10.1080/0734578X.2018.1459133

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 190

EP - 203

JO - Southeastern Archaeology

JF - Southeastern Archaeology

SN - 0734-578X

IS - 3

ER -