How antitrust lost its goal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the first seven decades following the enactment of the Sherman Act, competition was the uncontroversial goal of antitrust. The introduction of the consumer welfare standard led to the dissipation of "competition " as the goal of U.S. competition laws. This Essay explores how antitrust lost the goal of competition and argues that this goal should be restored. The Essay reevaluates several influential antitrust propositions. First, while "consumer welfare " was offered as a remedy for reconciling contradictions and inconsistencies in antitrust, the adoption of the consumer welfare standard sparked an enduring controversy, causing confusion and doctrinal uncertainty. In effect, the consumer welfare standard established the greatest antitrust paradox yet. Second, the smallbusiness interests hypothesis, which has often been used to explain the enactment of the Sherman Act, is inconsistent with the well-documented historical record. Third, the logic of Robert Bork's consumer welfare thesis requires restoration of "competition" as the goal of antitrust. The Essay concludes with a straightforward observation: "consumer welfare" may continue serving as the stated goal of U.S. competition laws but, practically, antitrust has always been and will always be about the preservation of competition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2253-2277
Number of pages25
JournalFordham Law Review
Volume81
Issue number5
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

welfare
act
Law
restoration
remedies
uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

How antitrust lost its goal. / Orbach, Barak Y.

In: Fordham Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 5, 04.2013, p. 2253-2277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Orbach, BY 2013, 'How antitrust lost its goal', Fordham Law Review, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 2253-2277.
Orbach, Barak Y. / How antitrust lost its goal. In: Fordham Law Review. 2013 ; Vol. 81, No. 5. pp. 2253-2277.
@article{0fb336be8eb540f995b541fd432cb5aa,
title = "How antitrust lost its goal",
abstract = "During the first seven decades following the enactment of the Sherman Act, competition was the uncontroversial goal of antitrust. The introduction of the consumer welfare standard led to the dissipation of {"}competition {"} as the goal of U.S. competition laws. This Essay explores how antitrust lost the goal of competition and argues that this goal should be restored. The Essay reevaluates several influential antitrust propositions. First, while {"}consumer welfare {"} was offered as a remedy for reconciling contradictions and inconsistencies in antitrust, the adoption of the consumer welfare standard sparked an enduring controversy, causing confusion and doctrinal uncertainty. In effect, the consumer welfare standard established the greatest antitrust paradox yet. Second, the smallbusiness interests hypothesis, which has often been used to explain the enactment of the Sherman Act, is inconsistent with the well-documented historical record. Third, the logic of Robert Bork's consumer welfare thesis requires restoration of {"}competition{"} as the goal of antitrust. The Essay concludes with a straightforward observation: {"}consumer welfare{"} may continue serving as the stated goal of U.S. competition laws but, practically, antitrust has always been and will always be about the preservation of competition.",
author = "Orbach, {Barak Y}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "2253--2277",
journal = "Fordham Law Review",
issn = "0015-704X",
publisher = "Fordham University School of Law",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How antitrust lost its goal

AU - Orbach, Barak Y

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - During the first seven decades following the enactment of the Sherman Act, competition was the uncontroversial goal of antitrust. The introduction of the consumer welfare standard led to the dissipation of "competition " as the goal of U.S. competition laws. This Essay explores how antitrust lost the goal of competition and argues that this goal should be restored. The Essay reevaluates several influential antitrust propositions. First, while "consumer welfare " was offered as a remedy for reconciling contradictions and inconsistencies in antitrust, the adoption of the consumer welfare standard sparked an enduring controversy, causing confusion and doctrinal uncertainty. In effect, the consumer welfare standard established the greatest antitrust paradox yet. Second, the smallbusiness interests hypothesis, which has often been used to explain the enactment of the Sherman Act, is inconsistent with the well-documented historical record. Third, the logic of Robert Bork's consumer welfare thesis requires restoration of "competition" as the goal of antitrust. The Essay concludes with a straightforward observation: "consumer welfare" may continue serving as the stated goal of U.S. competition laws but, practically, antitrust has always been and will always be about the preservation of competition.

AB - During the first seven decades following the enactment of the Sherman Act, competition was the uncontroversial goal of antitrust. The introduction of the consumer welfare standard led to the dissipation of "competition " as the goal of U.S. competition laws. This Essay explores how antitrust lost the goal of competition and argues that this goal should be restored. The Essay reevaluates several influential antitrust propositions. First, while "consumer welfare " was offered as a remedy for reconciling contradictions and inconsistencies in antitrust, the adoption of the consumer welfare standard sparked an enduring controversy, causing confusion and doctrinal uncertainty. In effect, the consumer welfare standard established the greatest antitrust paradox yet. Second, the smallbusiness interests hypothesis, which has often been used to explain the enactment of the Sherman Act, is inconsistent with the well-documented historical record. Third, the logic of Robert Bork's consumer welfare thesis requires restoration of "competition" as the goal of antitrust. The Essay concludes with a straightforward observation: "consumer welfare" may continue serving as the stated goal of U.S. competition laws but, practically, antitrust has always been and will always be about the preservation of competition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876253869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876253869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 2253

EP - 2277

JO - Fordham Law Review

JF - Fordham Law Review

SN - 0015-704X

IS - 5

ER -