How do Australian podiatrists manage patients with diabetes? The Australian diabetic foot management survey

Thomas R. Quinton, Peter A. Lazzarini, Frances M. Boyle, Anthony W. Russell, David G Armstrong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot complications are the leading cause of lower extremity amputation and diabetes-related hospitalisation in Australia. Studies demonstrate significant reductions in amputations and hospitalisation when health professionals implement best practice management. Whilst other nations have surveyed health professionals on specific diabetic foot management, to the best of the authors' knowledge this appears not to have occurred in Australia. The primary aim of this study was to examine Australian podiatrists' diabetic foot management compared with best practice recommendations by the Australian National Health Medical Research Council. Methods: A 36-item Australian Diabetic Foot Management survey, employing seven-point Likert scales (0 = Never; 7 = Always) to measure multiple aspects of best practice diabetic foot management was developed. The survey was briefly tested for face and content validity. The survey was electronically distributed to Australian podiatrists via professional associations. Demographics including sex, years treating patients with diabetes, employment-sector and patient numbers were also collected. Chi-squared and Mann Whitney U tests were used to test differences between sub-groups. Results: Three hundred and eleven podiatrists responded; 222 (71%) were female, 158 (51%) from the public sector and 11-15 years median experience. Participants reported treating a median of 21-30 diabetes patients each week, including 1-5 with foot ulcers. Overall, participants registered median scores of at least "very often" (>6) in their use of most items covering best practice diabetic foot management. Notable exceptions were: "never" (1 (1 - 3)) using total contact casting, "sometimes" (4 (2 - 5)) performing an ankle brachial index, "sometimes" (4 (1 - 6)) using University of Texas Wound Classification System, and "sometimes" (4 (3 - 6) referring to specialist multi-disciplinary foot teams. Public sector podiatrists reported higher use or access on all those items compared to private sector podiatrists (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study provides the first baseline information on Australian podiatrists' adherence to best practice diabetic foot guidelines. It appears podiatrists manage large caseloads of people with diabetes and are generally implementing best practice guidelines recommendations with some notable exceptions. Further studies are required to identify barriers to implementing these recommendations to ensure all Australians with diabetes have access to best practice care to prevent amputations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number16
JournalJournal of Foot and Ankle Research
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 18 2015

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Practice Guidelines
Amputation
Public Sector
Health
Hospitalization
Foot Ulcer
Ankle Brachial Index
Private Sector
Surveys and Questionnaires
Practice Management
Diabetes Complications
Nonparametric Statistics
Reproducibility of Results
Biomedical Research
Foot
Lower Extremity
Demography
Guidelines
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Diabetes
  • Foot
  • Survey
  • Ulcer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

How do Australian podiatrists manage patients with diabetes? The Australian diabetic foot management survey. / Quinton, Thomas R.; Lazzarini, Peter A.; Boyle, Frances M.; Russell, Anthony W.; Armstrong, David G.

In: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 16, 18.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quinton, Thomas R. ; Lazzarini, Peter A. ; Boyle, Frances M. ; Russell, Anthony W. ; Armstrong, David G. / How do Australian podiatrists manage patients with diabetes? The Australian diabetic foot management survey. In: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{6013cd97a7774e7ab5654a6e14bfed6a,
title = "How do Australian podiatrists manage patients with diabetes? The Australian diabetic foot management survey",
abstract = "Background: Diabetic foot complications are the leading cause of lower extremity amputation and diabetes-related hospitalisation in Australia. Studies demonstrate significant reductions in amputations and hospitalisation when health professionals implement best practice management. Whilst other nations have surveyed health professionals on specific diabetic foot management, to the best of the authors' knowledge this appears not to have occurred in Australia. The primary aim of this study was to examine Australian podiatrists' diabetic foot management compared with best practice recommendations by the Australian National Health Medical Research Council. Methods: A 36-item Australian Diabetic Foot Management survey, employing seven-point Likert scales (0 = Never; 7 = Always) to measure multiple aspects of best practice diabetic foot management was developed. The survey was briefly tested for face and content validity. The survey was electronically distributed to Australian podiatrists via professional associations. Demographics including sex, years treating patients with diabetes, employment-sector and patient numbers were also collected. Chi-squared and Mann Whitney U tests were used to test differences between sub-groups. Results: Three hundred and eleven podiatrists responded; 222 (71{\%}) were female, 158 (51{\%}) from the public sector and 11-15 years median experience. Participants reported treating a median of 21-30 diabetes patients each week, including 1-5 with foot ulcers. Overall, participants registered median scores of at least {"}very often{"} (>6) in their use of most items covering best practice diabetic foot management. Notable exceptions were: {"}never{"} (1 (1 - 3)) using total contact casting, {"}sometimes{"} (4 (2 - 5)) performing an ankle brachial index, {"}sometimes{"} (4 (1 - 6)) using University of Texas Wound Classification System, and {"}sometimes{"} (4 (3 - 6) referring to specialist multi-disciplinary foot teams. Public sector podiatrists reported higher use or access on all those items compared to private sector podiatrists (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study provides the first baseline information on Australian podiatrists' adherence to best practice diabetic foot guidelines. It appears podiatrists manage large caseloads of people with diabetes and are generally implementing best practice guidelines recommendations with some notable exceptions. Further studies are required to identify barriers to implementing these recommendations to ensure all Australians with diabetes have access to best practice care to prevent amputations.",
keywords = "Australia, Diabetes, Foot, Survey, Ulcer",
author = "Quinton, {Thomas R.} and Lazzarini, {Peter A.} and Boyle, {Frances M.} and Russell, {Anthony W.} and Armstrong, {David G}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1186/s13047-015-0072-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Journal of Foot and Ankle Research",
issn = "1757-1146",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do Australian podiatrists manage patients with diabetes? The Australian diabetic foot management survey

AU - Quinton, Thomas R.

AU - Lazzarini, Peter A.

AU - Boyle, Frances M.

AU - Russell, Anthony W.

AU - Armstrong, David G

PY - 2015/4/18

Y1 - 2015/4/18

N2 - Background: Diabetic foot complications are the leading cause of lower extremity amputation and diabetes-related hospitalisation in Australia. Studies demonstrate significant reductions in amputations and hospitalisation when health professionals implement best practice management. Whilst other nations have surveyed health professionals on specific diabetic foot management, to the best of the authors' knowledge this appears not to have occurred in Australia. The primary aim of this study was to examine Australian podiatrists' diabetic foot management compared with best practice recommendations by the Australian National Health Medical Research Council. Methods: A 36-item Australian Diabetic Foot Management survey, employing seven-point Likert scales (0 = Never; 7 = Always) to measure multiple aspects of best practice diabetic foot management was developed. The survey was briefly tested for face and content validity. The survey was electronically distributed to Australian podiatrists via professional associations. Demographics including sex, years treating patients with diabetes, employment-sector and patient numbers were also collected. Chi-squared and Mann Whitney U tests were used to test differences between sub-groups. Results: Three hundred and eleven podiatrists responded; 222 (71%) were female, 158 (51%) from the public sector and 11-15 years median experience. Participants reported treating a median of 21-30 diabetes patients each week, including 1-5 with foot ulcers. Overall, participants registered median scores of at least "very often" (>6) in their use of most items covering best practice diabetic foot management. Notable exceptions were: "never" (1 (1 - 3)) using total contact casting, "sometimes" (4 (2 - 5)) performing an ankle brachial index, "sometimes" (4 (1 - 6)) using University of Texas Wound Classification System, and "sometimes" (4 (3 - 6) referring to specialist multi-disciplinary foot teams. Public sector podiatrists reported higher use or access on all those items compared to private sector podiatrists (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study provides the first baseline information on Australian podiatrists' adherence to best practice diabetic foot guidelines. It appears podiatrists manage large caseloads of people with diabetes and are generally implementing best practice guidelines recommendations with some notable exceptions. Further studies are required to identify barriers to implementing these recommendations to ensure all Australians with diabetes have access to best practice care to prevent amputations.

AB - Background: Diabetic foot complications are the leading cause of lower extremity amputation and diabetes-related hospitalisation in Australia. Studies demonstrate significant reductions in amputations and hospitalisation when health professionals implement best practice management. Whilst other nations have surveyed health professionals on specific diabetic foot management, to the best of the authors' knowledge this appears not to have occurred in Australia. The primary aim of this study was to examine Australian podiatrists' diabetic foot management compared with best practice recommendations by the Australian National Health Medical Research Council. Methods: A 36-item Australian Diabetic Foot Management survey, employing seven-point Likert scales (0 = Never; 7 = Always) to measure multiple aspects of best practice diabetic foot management was developed. The survey was briefly tested for face and content validity. The survey was electronically distributed to Australian podiatrists via professional associations. Demographics including sex, years treating patients with diabetes, employment-sector and patient numbers were also collected. Chi-squared and Mann Whitney U tests were used to test differences between sub-groups. Results: Three hundred and eleven podiatrists responded; 222 (71%) were female, 158 (51%) from the public sector and 11-15 years median experience. Participants reported treating a median of 21-30 diabetes patients each week, including 1-5 with foot ulcers. Overall, participants registered median scores of at least "very often" (>6) in their use of most items covering best practice diabetic foot management. Notable exceptions were: "never" (1 (1 - 3)) using total contact casting, "sometimes" (4 (2 - 5)) performing an ankle brachial index, "sometimes" (4 (1 - 6)) using University of Texas Wound Classification System, and "sometimes" (4 (3 - 6) referring to specialist multi-disciplinary foot teams. Public sector podiatrists reported higher use or access on all those items compared to private sector podiatrists (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study provides the first baseline information on Australian podiatrists' adherence to best practice diabetic foot guidelines. It appears podiatrists manage large caseloads of people with diabetes and are generally implementing best practice guidelines recommendations with some notable exceptions. Further studies are required to identify barriers to implementing these recommendations to ensure all Australians with diabetes have access to best practice care to prevent amputations.

KW - Australia

KW - Diabetes

KW - Foot

KW - Survey

KW - Ulcer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928255871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928255871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13047-015-0072-y

DO - 10.1186/s13047-015-0072-y

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

JF - Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

SN - 1757-1146

IS - 1

M1 - 16

ER -