How do homebuyers value different types of green space?

Rosalind H. Bark, Daniel E. Osgood, Bonnie G Colby, Eve B. Halper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is important to understand tradeoffs in preferences for natural and constructed green space in semi-arid urban areas because these lands compete for scarce water resources. We perform a hedonic study using high resolution, remotely-sensed vegetation indices and house sales records. We find that homebuyers in the study area prefer greener lots, greener neighborhoods, and greener nearby riparian corridors, and they pay premiums for proximity to green space amenities. The findings have fundamental implications for the efficient allocation of limited water supplies between different types of green space and for native vegetation conservation in semi-arid metropolitan areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-415
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Volume36
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

riparian areas
water resources
urban areas
sales
water supply
vegetation
vegetation index
Vegetation

Keywords

  • Golf course
  • Hedonic model
  • Locally weighted regression
  • Open space
  • Park
  • Riparian
  • Spatial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

How do homebuyers value different types of green space? / Bark, Rosalind H.; Osgood, Daniel E.; Colby, Bonnie G; Halper, Eve B.

In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 36, No. 2, 08.2011, p. 395-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bark, Rosalind H. ; Osgood, Daniel E. ; Colby, Bonnie G ; Halper, Eve B. / How do homebuyers value different types of green space?. In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2011 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 395-415.
@article{6db6f91b821e4e84af34e7ea04fdd3c1,
title = "How do homebuyers value different types of green space?",
abstract = "It is important to understand tradeoffs in preferences for natural and constructed green space in semi-arid urban areas because these lands compete for scarce water resources. We perform a hedonic study using high resolution, remotely-sensed vegetation indices and house sales records. We find that homebuyers in the study area prefer greener lots, greener neighborhoods, and greener nearby riparian corridors, and they pay premiums for proximity to green space amenities. The findings have fundamental implications for the efficient allocation of limited water supplies between different types of green space and for native vegetation conservation in semi-arid metropolitan areas.",
keywords = "Golf course, Hedonic model, Locally weighted regression, Open space, Park, Riparian, Spatial",
author = "Bark, {Rosalind H.} and Osgood, {Daniel E.} and Colby, {Bonnie G} and Halper, {Eve B.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "395--415",
journal = "Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics",
issn = "1068-5502",
publisher = "Colorado State University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do homebuyers value different types of green space?

AU - Bark, Rosalind H.

AU - Osgood, Daniel E.

AU - Colby, Bonnie G

AU - Halper, Eve B.

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - It is important to understand tradeoffs in preferences for natural and constructed green space in semi-arid urban areas because these lands compete for scarce water resources. We perform a hedonic study using high resolution, remotely-sensed vegetation indices and house sales records. We find that homebuyers in the study area prefer greener lots, greener neighborhoods, and greener nearby riparian corridors, and they pay premiums for proximity to green space amenities. The findings have fundamental implications for the efficient allocation of limited water supplies between different types of green space and for native vegetation conservation in semi-arid metropolitan areas.

AB - It is important to understand tradeoffs in preferences for natural and constructed green space in semi-arid urban areas because these lands compete for scarce water resources. We perform a hedonic study using high resolution, remotely-sensed vegetation indices and house sales records. We find that homebuyers in the study area prefer greener lots, greener neighborhoods, and greener nearby riparian corridors, and they pay premiums for proximity to green space amenities. The findings have fundamental implications for the efficient allocation of limited water supplies between different types of green space and for native vegetation conservation in semi-arid metropolitan areas.

KW - Golf course

KW - Hedonic model

KW - Locally weighted regression

KW - Open space

KW - Park

KW - Riparian

KW - Spatial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81755172152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81755172152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:81755172152

VL - 36

SP - 395

EP - 415

JO - Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

JF - Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

SN - 1068-5502

IS - 2

ER -