How does influence strategy work? The moderating role of cognitive institutional profile and mediating role of commitment

Weihe Gao, Mrinal G Ghosh, Liping Qian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Influence strategies are crucial factors in interfirm relationships, however, the current research leaves much to explore. This paper develops a conceptual model focusing on the effects of two types of non-coercive influence strategies on joint profits, the moderating effects of the cognitive institutional profile, and the mediating role of commitment. Empirical results based on data from a survey of 262 buyer-supplier dyads show that information and financial incentive influence strategies foster joint profits by enhancing the buyer's commitment to the relationship (BCtoR); cognitive institutional profile undermines the positive effects of influence strategies on BCtoR. The findings reveal interfirm influence factors that go beyond dyadic interactions, thereby extending the current thinking on influence strategies and institutional theory as they apply to interfirm relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalIndustrial Marketing Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Influence strategies
Buyers
Profit
Interfirm relationships
Factors
Strategy theory
Dyads
Institutional theory
Moderating effect
Influence factors
Empirical results
Conceptual model
Suppliers
Interaction
Financial incentives

Keywords

  • Cognitive institutional profile
  • Commitment to relationship
  • Financial incentive influence strategy
  • Information influence strategy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{6bedcf3157c842c389afcc0a2715655c,
title = "How does influence strategy work? The moderating role of cognitive institutional profile and mediating role of commitment",
abstract = "Influence strategies are crucial factors in interfirm relationships, however, the current research leaves much to explore. This paper develops a conceptual model focusing on the effects of two types of non-coercive influence strategies on joint profits, the moderating effects of the cognitive institutional profile, and the mediating role of commitment. Empirical results based on data from a survey of 262 buyer-supplier dyads show that information and financial incentive influence strategies foster joint profits by enhancing the buyer's commitment to the relationship (BCtoR); cognitive institutional profile undermines the positive effects of influence strategies on BCtoR. The findings reveal interfirm influence factors that go beyond dyadic interactions, thereby extending the current thinking on influence strategies and institutional theory as they apply to interfirm relationships.",
keywords = "Cognitive institutional profile, Commitment to relationship, Financial incentive influence strategy, Information influence strategy",
author = "Weihe Gao and Ghosh, {Mrinal G} and Liping Qian",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.010",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Industrial Marketing Management",
issn = "0019-8501",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does influence strategy work? The moderating role of cognitive institutional profile and mediating role of commitment

AU - Gao, Weihe

AU - Ghosh, Mrinal G

AU - Qian, Liping

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Influence strategies are crucial factors in interfirm relationships, however, the current research leaves much to explore. This paper develops a conceptual model focusing on the effects of two types of non-coercive influence strategies on joint profits, the moderating effects of the cognitive institutional profile, and the mediating role of commitment. Empirical results based on data from a survey of 262 buyer-supplier dyads show that information and financial incentive influence strategies foster joint profits by enhancing the buyer's commitment to the relationship (BCtoR); cognitive institutional profile undermines the positive effects of influence strategies on BCtoR. The findings reveal interfirm influence factors that go beyond dyadic interactions, thereby extending the current thinking on influence strategies and institutional theory as they apply to interfirm relationships.

AB - Influence strategies are crucial factors in interfirm relationships, however, the current research leaves much to explore. This paper develops a conceptual model focusing on the effects of two types of non-coercive influence strategies on joint profits, the moderating effects of the cognitive institutional profile, and the mediating role of commitment. Empirical results based on data from a survey of 262 buyer-supplier dyads show that information and financial incentive influence strategies foster joint profits by enhancing the buyer's commitment to the relationship (BCtoR); cognitive institutional profile undermines the positive effects of influence strategies on BCtoR. The findings reveal interfirm influence factors that go beyond dyadic interactions, thereby extending the current thinking on influence strategies and institutional theory as they apply to interfirm relationships.

KW - Cognitive institutional profile

KW - Commitment to relationship

KW - Financial incentive influence strategy

KW - Information influence strategy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035109762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035109762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85035109762

JO - Industrial Marketing Management

JF - Industrial Marketing Management

SN - 0019-8501

ER -