How multiple reference points influence managers' post-decisional regret

Wen Hsien Huang, Li Jung Tseng, Terence Connolly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although regret is the most relevant emotion in the domain of decision making, research addressing the regrets of managers and how these are influenced by multiple reference points is lacking. In the context of a choice set with more than 2 alternatives, this study demonstrates that sales managers evaluated their postdecisional regrets based on three reference points: the best-performing unchosen outcome, the worst-performing unchosen outcome, and their expected outcome. The first 2 are social comparison-based standards and the last is a temporal comparison-based standard. Managers equally favored social comparison and temporal standard information when assessing their postdecisional regrets. In addition, it was found that the feeling of regret was largely influenced by a loss or gain relative to each reference point rather than by the degree of loss or gain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-498
Number of pages12
JournalSocial Behavior and Personality
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Emotions
Decision Making
Research

Keywords

  • Expectation
  • Reference point
  • Regret
  • Social comparison
  • Temporal comparison

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

How multiple reference points influence managers' post-decisional regret. / Huang, Wen Hsien; Tseng, Li Jung; Connolly, Terence.

In: Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2007, p. 487-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c6d4f64fb4c848f6b7494c33f93dfd45,
title = "How multiple reference points influence managers' post-decisional regret",
abstract = "Although regret is the most relevant emotion in the domain of decision making, research addressing the regrets of managers and how these are influenced by multiple reference points is lacking. In the context of a choice set with more than 2 alternatives, this study demonstrates that sales managers evaluated their postdecisional regrets based on three reference points: the best-performing unchosen outcome, the worst-performing unchosen outcome, and their expected outcome. The first 2 are social comparison-based standards and the last is a temporal comparison-based standard. Managers equally favored social comparison and temporal standard information when assessing their postdecisional regrets. In addition, it was found that the feeling of regret was largely influenced by a loss or gain relative to each reference point rather than by the degree of loss or gain.",
keywords = "Expectation, Reference point, Regret, Social comparison, Temporal comparison",
author = "Huang, {Wen Hsien} and Tseng, {Li Jung} and Terence Connolly",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.2224/sbp.2007.35.4.487",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "487--498",
journal = "Social Behavior and Personality",
issn = "0301-2212",
publisher = "Society for Personal Research",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How multiple reference points influence managers' post-decisional regret

AU - Huang, Wen Hsien

AU - Tseng, Li Jung

AU - Connolly, Terence

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Although regret is the most relevant emotion in the domain of decision making, research addressing the regrets of managers and how these are influenced by multiple reference points is lacking. In the context of a choice set with more than 2 alternatives, this study demonstrates that sales managers evaluated their postdecisional regrets based on three reference points: the best-performing unchosen outcome, the worst-performing unchosen outcome, and their expected outcome. The first 2 are social comparison-based standards and the last is a temporal comparison-based standard. Managers equally favored social comparison and temporal standard information when assessing their postdecisional regrets. In addition, it was found that the feeling of regret was largely influenced by a loss or gain relative to each reference point rather than by the degree of loss or gain.

AB - Although regret is the most relevant emotion in the domain of decision making, research addressing the regrets of managers and how these are influenced by multiple reference points is lacking. In the context of a choice set with more than 2 alternatives, this study demonstrates that sales managers evaluated their postdecisional regrets based on three reference points: the best-performing unchosen outcome, the worst-performing unchosen outcome, and their expected outcome. The first 2 are social comparison-based standards and the last is a temporal comparison-based standard. Managers equally favored social comparison and temporal standard information when assessing their postdecisional regrets. In addition, it was found that the feeling of regret was largely influenced by a loss or gain relative to each reference point rather than by the degree of loss or gain.

KW - Expectation

KW - Reference point

KW - Regret

KW - Social comparison

KW - Temporal comparison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547215804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547215804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2224/sbp.2007.35.4.487

DO - 10.2224/sbp.2007.35.4.487

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34547215804

VL - 35

SP - 487

EP - 498

JO - Social Behavior and Personality

JF - Social Behavior and Personality

SN - 0301-2212

IS - 4

ER -