How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage: Trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention

Richard Reed, Susan Storrud-Barnes, Leonard Michael Jessup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to explore how community-controlled open innovation affects cost- and differentiation-based competitive advantage, and to explain how it allows some sources of economic rent to remain while others are taken away. Although models of competitive-advantage remain relevant, open innovation means that the main drivers of performance are changed. Open innovation means that there are implications for firms' ability to profit from intellectual property that they do not own. The paper seeks to address those issues. Design/methodology/approach: The work is conceptual. Findings: Economic rents from property rights disappear, those from economies of scale and capital requirements are reduced, but those from experience-curve effects, differentiation, distribution, and switching costs remain. Similarly, rents from the difficult-to-imitate resources of networks and reputation remain intact, and while those from employee knowhow and culture remain, they are likely to be in reduced amounts. Research limitations/implications: Propositions are provided for empirical testing. There also is a need to identify breakpoints between open-innovation benefits and the costs associated with lost innovation skills, and a need to extend this work to firm-controlled and third-party controlled open innovation. Practical implications: For some firms open innovation will not adversely affect competitive advantage but those whose advantage is driven by barriers to entry, skills in innovation and anticipating customer needs, or that rely on proprietary product designs, can lose in the longer term. Originality/value: Where the majority of work examining open innovation addresses property rights, economic rationales, governance, and processes, this work focuses on the effects of open innovation on strategy content and consequent firm performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-73
Number of pages16
JournalManagement Decision
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Competitive advantage
Ownership
Invention
Open innovation
Innovation
Property rights
Economic rent
Costs
Distribution costs
Barriers to entry
Testing
Governance
Firm performance
Economies of scale
Intellectual property
Resources
Economics
Rationale
Product design
Customer needs

Keywords

  • Competitive advantage
  • Economic rents
  • Innovation
  • Open innovation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage : Trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention. / Reed, Richard; Storrud-Barnes, Susan; Jessup, Leonard Michael.

In: Management Decision, Vol. 50, No. 1, 02.2012, p. 58-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58bc389a386b4a1cab898445e0b0d1b3,
title = "How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage: Trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to explore how community-controlled open innovation affects cost- and differentiation-based competitive advantage, and to explain how it allows some sources of economic rent to remain while others are taken away. Although models of competitive-advantage remain relevant, open innovation means that the main drivers of performance are changed. Open innovation means that there are implications for firms' ability to profit from intellectual property that they do not own. The paper seeks to address those issues. Design/methodology/approach: The work is conceptual. Findings: Economic rents from property rights disappear, those from economies of scale and capital requirements are reduced, but those from experience-curve effects, differentiation, distribution, and switching costs remain. Similarly, rents from the difficult-to-imitate resources of networks and reputation remain intact, and while those from employee knowhow and culture remain, they are likely to be in reduced amounts. Research limitations/implications: Propositions are provided for empirical testing. There also is a need to identify breakpoints between open-innovation benefits and the costs associated with lost innovation skills, and a need to extend this work to firm-controlled and third-party controlled open innovation. Practical implications: For some firms open innovation will not adversely affect competitive advantage but those whose advantage is driven by barriers to entry, skills in innovation and anticipating customer needs, or that rely on proprietary product designs, can lose in the longer term. Originality/value: Where the majority of work examining open innovation addresses property rights, economic rationales, governance, and processes, this work focuses on the effects of open innovation on strategy content and consequent firm performance.",
keywords = "Competitive advantage, Economic rents, Innovation, Open innovation",
author = "Richard Reed and Susan Storrud-Barnes and Jessup, {Leonard Michael}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1108/00251741211194877",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "58--73",
journal = "Management Decision",
issn = "0025-1747",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage

T2 - Trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention

AU - Reed, Richard

AU - Storrud-Barnes, Susan

AU - Jessup, Leonard Michael

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to explore how community-controlled open innovation affects cost- and differentiation-based competitive advantage, and to explain how it allows some sources of economic rent to remain while others are taken away. Although models of competitive-advantage remain relevant, open innovation means that the main drivers of performance are changed. Open innovation means that there are implications for firms' ability to profit from intellectual property that they do not own. The paper seeks to address those issues. Design/methodology/approach: The work is conceptual. Findings: Economic rents from property rights disappear, those from economies of scale and capital requirements are reduced, but those from experience-curve effects, differentiation, distribution, and switching costs remain. Similarly, rents from the difficult-to-imitate resources of networks and reputation remain intact, and while those from employee knowhow and culture remain, they are likely to be in reduced amounts. Research limitations/implications: Propositions are provided for empirical testing. There also is a need to identify breakpoints between open-innovation benefits and the costs associated with lost innovation skills, and a need to extend this work to firm-controlled and third-party controlled open innovation. Practical implications: For some firms open innovation will not adversely affect competitive advantage but those whose advantage is driven by barriers to entry, skills in innovation and anticipating customer needs, or that rely on proprietary product designs, can lose in the longer term. Originality/value: Where the majority of work examining open innovation addresses property rights, economic rationales, governance, and processes, this work focuses on the effects of open innovation on strategy content and consequent firm performance.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to explore how community-controlled open innovation affects cost- and differentiation-based competitive advantage, and to explain how it allows some sources of economic rent to remain while others are taken away. Although models of competitive-advantage remain relevant, open innovation means that the main drivers of performance are changed. Open innovation means that there are implications for firms' ability to profit from intellectual property that they do not own. The paper seeks to address those issues. Design/methodology/approach: The work is conceptual. Findings: Economic rents from property rights disappear, those from economies of scale and capital requirements are reduced, but those from experience-curve effects, differentiation, distribution, and switching costs remain. Similarly, rents from the difficult-to-imitate resources of networks and reputation remain intact, and while those from employee knowhow and culture remain, they are likely to be in reduced amounts. Research limitations/implications: Propositions are provided for empirical testing. There also is a need to identify breakpoints between open-innovation benefits and the costs associated with lost innovation skills, and a need to extend this work to firm-controlled and third-party controlled open innovation. Practical implications: For some firms open innovation will not adversely affect competitive advantage but those whose advantage is driven by barriers to entry, skills in innovation and anticipating customer needs, or that rely on proprietary product designs, can lose in the longer term. Originality/value: Where the majority of work examining open innovation addresses property rights, economic rationales, governance, and processes, this work focuses on the effects of open innovation on strategy content and consequent firm performance.

KW - Competitive advantage

KW - Economic rents

KW - Innovation

KW - Open innovation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856161690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856161690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/00251741211194877

DO - 10.1108/00251741211194877

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856161690

VL - 50

SP - 58

EP - 73

JO - Management Decision

JF - Management Decision

SN - 0025-1747

IS - 1

ER -