How Patients' Stories Shape Their Votes: The Role of Health Care in the 2018 U.S. Midterm Elections

Paul Gordon, Eve Shapiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reflecting on the 2018 U.S. midterm elections, it is clear that health care coverage once again played an important role. This prompted the authors to look back on their 2016 bike listening tour across the country when they asked people about their views on the Affordable Care Act. Through those conversations, the authors observed that a common thread was the rampant misunderstanding of health insurance coverage and the central role that politicians had in the creation of policy. In this Invited Commentary, the authors explore the results of the 2018 election, particularly in the rural northern areas where they toured in 2016, and the contradictions between what people say they want, what the candidates say they support, and what the facts actually show. They offer suggestions for the role physicians might play with patients in correcting misunderstandings about the health care system and the policies that shape it. Patients do not always make decisions as physicians do. As opposed to evidence and data, they might rely on personal experiences and stories. The authors suggest that physicians might be able to help patients use these stories to inform their decisions, and to help them understand the connection between their personal health care experiences and the votes they cast in elections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)931-933
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Volume94
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

voter
election
physician
health care
insurance coverage
health insurance
politician
experience
conversation
candidacy
coverage
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{bf666bd20c5e49e39cb4f93f89eaf039,
title = "How Patients' Stories Shape Their Votes: The Role of Health Care in the 2018 U.S. Midterm Elections",
abstract = "Reflecting on the 2018 U.S. midterm elections, it is clear that health care coverage once again played an important role. This prompted the authors to look back on their 2016 bike listening tour across the country when they asked people about their views on the Affordable Care Act. Through those conversations, the authors observed that a common thread was the rampant misunderstanding of health insurance coverage and the central role that politicians had in the creation of policy. In this Invited Commentary, the authors explore the results of the 2018 election, particularly in the rural northern areas where they toured in 2016, and the contradictions between what people say they want, what the candidates say they support, and what the facts actually show. They offer suggestions for the role physicians might play with patients in correcting misunderstandings about the health care system and the policies that shape it. Patients do not always make decisions as physicians do. As opposed to evidence and data, they might rely on personal experiences and stories. The authors suggest that physicians might be able to help patients use these stories to inform their decisions, and to help them understand the connection between their personal health care experiences and the votes they cast in elections.",
author = "Paul Gordon and Eve Shapiro",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000002669",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "931--933",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Patients' Stories Shape Their Votes

T2 - The Role of Health Care in the 2018 U.S. Midterm Elections

AU - Gordon, Paul

AU - Shapiro, Eve

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Reflecting on the 2018 U.S. midterm elections, it is clear that health care coverage once again played an important role. This prompted the authors to look back on their 2016 bike listening tour across the country when they asked people about their views on the Affordable Care Act. Through those conversations, the authors observed that a common thread was the rampant misunderstanding of health insurance coverage and the central role that politicians had in the creation of policy. In this Invited Commentary, the authors explore the results of the 2018 election, particularly in the rural northern areas where they toured in 2016, and the contradictions between what people say they want, what the candidates say they support, and what the facts actually show. They offer suggestions for the role physicians might play with patients in correcting misunderstandings about the health care system and the policies that shape it. Patients do not always make decisions as physicians do. As opposed to evidence and data, they might rely on personal experiences and stories. The authors suggest that physicians might be able to help patients use these stories to inform their decisions, and to help them understand the connection between their personal health care experiences and the votes they cast in elections.

AB - Reflecting on the 2018 U.S. midterm elections, it is clear that health care coverage once again played an important role. This prompted the authors to look back on their 2016 bike listening tour across the country when they asked people about their views on the Affordable Care Act. Through those conversations, the authors observed that a common thread was the rampant misunderstanding of health insurance coverage and the central role that politicians had in the creation of policy. In this Invited Commentary, the authors explore the results of the 2018 election, particularly in the rural northern areas where they toured in 2016, and the contradictions between what people say they want, what the candidates say they support, and what the facts actually show. They offer suggestions for the role physicians might play with patients in correcting misunderstandings about the health care system and the policies that shape it. Patients do not always make decisions as physicians do. As opposed to evidence and data, they might rely on personal experiences and stories. The authors suggest that physicians might be able to help patients use these stories to inform their decisions, and to help them understand the connection between their personal health care experiences and the votes they cast in elections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068880424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068880424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002669

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002669

M3 - Article

C2 - 30801272

AN - SCOPUS:85068880424

VL - 94

SP - 931

EP - 933

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 7

ER -