How teachers respond to school bullying: An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies

Christoph Burger, Dagmar Strohmeier, Nina Spröber, Sheri A Bauman, Ken Rigby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Teachers' ( N = 625; 74% female) use of intervention strategies was examined in a hypothetical bullying episode. Self-reported strategies were best described by a five-factor structure. Teachers preferred authority-based interventions, followed by non-punitive work with bullies and involvement of other adults. They were less likely to work with victims or ignore the incident. About 60% of teachers would apply authority-based interventions toward bullies without working with victims at the same time, while 3% would work with victims without using authority-based interventions toward bullies. Strategy use was moderated by teachers' gender and teaching experience. Implications for bullying prevention and teacher education are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-202
Number of pages12
JournalTeaching and Teacher Education
Volume51
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

intervention strategy
moderator
exclusion
examination
teacher
school
incident
gender
Teaching
education
experience

Keywords

  • Anti-bullying intervention
  • Bullying
  • Configural frequency analysis
  • Handling bullying questionnaire (HBQ)
  • Intervention strategies
  • School violence
  • Teacher response
  • Victimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

How teachers respond to school bullying : An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies. / Burger, Christoph; Strohmeier, Dagmar; Spröber, Nina; Bauman, Sheri A; Rigby, Ken.

In: Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 51, 01.10.2015, p. 191-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77211dcf470c42cfb4c2bc46252204fd,
title = "How teachers respond to school bullying: An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies",
abstract = "Teachers' ( N = 625; 74{\%} female) use of intervention strategies was examined in a hypothetical bullying episode. Self-reported strategies were best described by a five-factor structure. Teachers preferred authority-based interventions, followed by non-punitive work with bullies and involvement of other adults. They were less likely to work with victims or ignore the incident. About 60{\%} of teachers would apply authority-based interventions toward bullies without working with victims at the same time, while 3{\%} would work with victims without using authority-based interventions toward bullies. Strategy use was moderated by teachers' gender and teaching experience. Implications for bullying prevention and teacher education are discussed.",
keywords = "Anti-bullying intervention, Bullying, Configural frequency analysis, Handling bullying questionnaire (HBQ), Intervention strategies, School violence, Teacher response, Victimization",
author = "Christoph Burger and Dagmar Strohmeier and Nina Spr{\"o}ber and Bauman, {Sheri A} and Ken Rigby",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "191--202",
journal = "Teaching and Teacher Education",
issn = "0742-051X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How teachers respond to school bullying

T2 - An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies

AU - Burger, Christoph

AU - Strohmeier, Dagmar

AU - Spröber, Nina

AU - Bauman, Sheri A

AU - Rigby, Ken

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Teachers' ( N = 625; 74% female) use of intervention strategies was examined in a hypothetical bullying episode. Self-reported strategies were best described by a five-factor structure. Teachers preferred authority-based interventions, followed by non-punitive work with bullies and involvement of other adults. They were less likely to work with victims or ignore the incident. About 60% of teachers would apply authority-based interventions toward bullies without working with victims at the same time, while 3% would work with victims without using authority-based interventions toward bullies. Strategy use was moderated by teachers' gender and teaching experience. Implications for bullying prevention and teacher education are discussed.

AB - Teachers' ( N = 625; 74% female) use of intervention strategies was examined in a hypothetical bullying episode. Self-reported strategies were best described by a five-factor structure. Teachers preferred authority-based interventions, followed by non-punitive work with bullies and involvement of other adults. They were less likely to work with victims or ignore the incident. About 60% of teachers would apply authority-based interventions toward bullies without working with victims at the same time, while 3% would work with victims without using authority-based interventions toward bullies. Strategy use was moderated by teachers' gender and teaching experience. Implications for bullying prevention and teacher education are discussed.

KW - Anti-bullying intervention

KW - Bullying

KW - Configural frequency analysis

KW - Handling bullying questionnaire (HBQ)

KW - Intervention strategies

KW - School violence

KW - Teacher response

KW - Victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937937231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937937231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937937231

VL - 51

SP - 191

EP - 202

JO - Teaching and Teacher Education

JF - Teaching and Teacher Education

SN - 0742-051X

ER -