Hydrogeologic uncertainties and policy implications

The Water Consumer Protection Act of Tucson, Arizona, USA

L. G. Wilson, W. G. Matlock, Katharine Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 1995 Water Consumer Protection Act of Tucson, Arizona, USA (hereafter known as the Act) was passed following complaints from Tucson Water customers receiving treated Central Arizona Project (CAP) water. Consequences of the Act demonstrate the uncertainties and difficulties that arise when the public is asked to vote on a highly technical issue. The recharge requirements of the Act neglect hydrogeological uncertainties because of confusion between "infiltration" and "recharge." Thus, the Act implies that infiltration in stream channels along the Central Well-field will promote recharge in the Central Wellfield. In fact, permeability differences between channel alluvium and underlying basin-fill deposits may lead to subjacent outflow. Additionally, even if recharge of Colorado River water occurs in the Central Wellfield, groundwater will become gradually salinized. The Act's restrictions on the use of CAP water affect the four regulatory mechanisms in Arizona's 1980 Groundwater Code as they relate to the Tucson Active Management Area: (a) supply augmentation; (b) requirements for groundwater withdrawals and permitting; (c) Management Plan requirements, particularly mandatory conservation and water-quality issues; and (d) the requirement that all new subdivisions use renewable water supplies in lieu of groundwater. Political fallout includes disruption of normal governmental activities because of the demands in implementing the Act.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-14
Number of pages12
JournalHydrogeology Journal
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

recharge
groundwater
infiltration
water
basin fill
stream channel
fallout
alluvial deposit
river water
outflow
water supply
permeability
water quality
consumer protection
policy
project

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Hydrogeologic uncertainties and policy implications : The Water Consumer Protection Act of Tucson, Arizona, USA. / Wilson, L. G.; Matlock, W. G.; Jacobs, Katharine.

In: Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1998, p. 3-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{423ce92b141c4c4cbca009f6abf53eb5,
title = "Hydrogeologic uncertainties and policy implications: The Water Consumer Protection Act of Tucson, Arizona, USA",
abstract = "The 1995 Water Consumer Protection Act of Tucson, Arizona, USA (hereafter known as the Act) was passed following complaints from Tucson Water customers receiving treated Central Arizona Project (CAP) water. Consequences of the Act demonstrate the uncertainties and difficulties that arise when the public is asked to vote on a highly technical issue. The recharge requirements of the Act neglect hydrogeological uncertainties because of confusion between {"}infiltration{"} and {"}recharge.{"} Thus, the Act implies that infiltration in stream channels along the Central Well-field will promote recharge in the Central Wellfield. In fact, permeability differences between channel alluvium and underlying basin-fill deposits may lead to subjacent outflow. Additionally, even if recharge of Colorado River water occurs in the Central Wellfield, groundwater will become gradually salinized. The Act's restrictions on the use of CAP water affect the four regulatory mechanisms in Arizona's 1980 Groundwater Code as they relate to the Tucson Active Management Area: (a) supply augmentation; (b) requirements for groundwater withdrawals and permitting; (c) Management Plan requirements, particularly mandatory conservation and water-quality issues; and (d) the requirement that all new subdivisions use renewable water supplies in lieu of groundwater. Political fallout includes disruption of normal governmental activities because of the demands in implementing the Act.",
author = "Wilson, {L. G.} and Matlock, {W. G.} and Katharine Jacobs",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "3--14",
journal = "Hydrogeology Journal",
issn = "1431-2174",
publisher = "Springer Heidelberg",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hydrogeologic uncertainties and policy implications

T2 - The Water Consumer Protection Act of Tucson, Arizona, USA

AU - Wilson, L. G.

AU - Matlock, W. G.

AU - Jacobs, Katharine

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The 1995 Water Consumer Protection Act of Tucson, Arizona, USA (hereafter known as the Act) was passed following complaints from Tucson Water customers receiving treated Central Arizona Project (CAP) water. Consequences of the Act demonstrate the uncertainties and difficulties that arise when the public is asked to vote on a highly technical issue. The recharge requirements of the Act neglect hydrogeological uncertainties because of confusion between "infiltration" and "recharge." Thus, the Act implies that infiltration in stream channels along the Central Well-field will promote recharge in the Central Wellfield. In fact, permeability differences between channel alluvium and underlying basin-fill deposits may lead to subjacent outflow. Additionally, even if recharge of Colorado River water occurs in the Central Wellfield, groundwater will become gradually salinized. The Act's restrictions on the use of CAP water affect the four regulatory mechanisms in Arizona's 1980 Groundwater Code as they relate to the Tucson Active Management Area: (a) supply augmentation; (b) requirements for groundwater withdrawals and permitting; (c) Management Plan requirements, particularly mandatory conservation and water-quality issues; and (d) the requirement that all new subdivisions use renewable water supplies in lieu of groundwater. Political fallout includes disruption of normal governmental activities because of the demands in implementing the Act.

AB - The 1995 Water Consumer Protection Act of Tucson, Arizona, USA (hereafter known as the Act) was passed following complaints from Tucson Water customers receiving treated Central Arizona Project (CAP) water. Consequences of the Act demonstrate the uncertainties and difficulties that arise when the public is asked to vote on a highly technical issue. The recharge requirements of the Act neglect hydrogeological uncertainties because of confusion between "infiltration" and "recharge." Thus, the Act implies that infiltration in stream channels along the Central Well-field will promote recharge in the Central Wellfield. In fact, permeability differences between channel alluvium and underlying basin-fill deposits may lead to subjacent outflow. Additionally, even if recharge of Colorado River water occurs in the Central Wellfield, groundwater will become gradually salinized. The Act's restrictions on the use of CAP water affect the four regulatory mechanisms in Arizona's 1980 Groundwater Code as they relate to the Tucson Active Management Area: (a) supply augmentation; (b) requirements for groundwater withdrawals and permitting; (c) Management Plan requirements, particularly mandatory conservation and water-quality issues; and (d) the requirement that all new subdivisions use renewable water supplies in lieu of groundwater. Political fallout includes disruption of normal governmental activities because of the demands in implementing the Act.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002356215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002356215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 3

EP - 14

JO - Hydrogeology Journal

JF - Hydrogeology Journal

SN - 1431-2174

IS - 1

ER -