Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades

John J Wiens, James W. Fetzner, Christopher L. Parkinson, Tod W. Reeder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

271 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How should characters and taxa be sampled to resolve efficiently the phylogeny of ancient and highly speciose groups? We addressed this question empirically in the treefrog family Hylidae, which contains >800 species and may be nonmonophyletic with respect to other anuran families. We sampled 81 species (54 hylids and 27 outgroups) for two mitochondrial genes (12S, ND1), two nuclear genes (POMC, c-myc), and morphology (144 characters) in an attempt to resolve higher-level relationships. We then added 117 taxa to the combined data set, many of which were sampled for only one gene (12S). Despite the relative incompleteness of the majority of taxa, the resulting trees placed all taxa in the expected higher-level clades with strong support, despite some taxa being >90% incomplete. Furthermore, we found no relationship between the completeness of a taxon and the support (parsimony bootstrap or Bayesian posterior probabilities) for its localized placement on the tree. Separate analysis of the data set with the most taxa (12S) gives a somewhat problematic estimate of higher-level relationships, suggesting that data sets scored only for some taxa (ND1, nuclear genes, morphology) are important in determining the outcome of the combined analysis. The results show that hemiphractine hylids are not closely related to other hylids and should be recognized as a distinct family. They also show that the speciose genus Hyla is polyphyletic, but that its species can be arranged into three monophyletic genera. A new classification of hylid frogs is proposed. Several potentially misleading signals in the morphological data are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)719-748
Number of pages30
JournalSystematic Biology
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Phylogeny
frog
Anura
frogs
phylogeny
gene
Hylidae
sampling
Pro-Opiomelanocortin
myc Genes
Mitochondrial Genes
genes
Genes
Hyla
data analysis
taxonomy
Datasets
family
analysis

Keywords

  • Amphibians
  • Anurans
  • Combined analysis
  • Hylid frogs
  • Missing data
  • Taxon sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. / Wiens, John J; Fetzner, James W.; Parkinson, Christopher L.; Reeder, Tod W.

In: Systematic Biology, Vol. 54, No. 5, 01.10.2005, p. 719-748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiens, John J ; Fetzner, James W. ; Parkinson, Christopher L. ; Reeder, Tod W. / Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. In: Systematic Biology. 2005 ; Vol. 54, No. 5. pp. 719-748.
@article{1cab37170e3d4604aa9bf810fe3541ae,
title = "Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades",
abstract = "How should characters and taxa be sampled to resolve efficiently the phylogeny of ancient and highly speciose groups? We addressed this question empirically in the treefrog family Hylidae, which contains >800 species and may be nonmonophyletic with respect to other anuran families. We sampled 81 species (54 hylids and 27 outgroups) for two mitochondrial genes (12S, ND1), two nuclear genes (POMC, c-myc), and morphology (144 characters) in an attempt to resolve higher-level relationships. We then added 117 taxa to the combined data set, many of which were sampled for only one gene (12S). Despite the relative incompleteness of the majority of taxa, the resulting trees placed all taxa in the expected higher-level clades with strong support, despite some taxa being >90{\%} incomplete. Furthermore, we found no relationship between the completeness of a taxon and the support (parsimony bootstrap or Bayesian posterior probabilities) for its localized placement on the tree. Separate analysis of the data set with the most taxa (12S) gives a somewhat problematic estimate of higher-level relationships, suggesting that data sets scored only for some taxa (ND1, nuclear genes, morphology) are important in determining the outcome of the combined analysis. The results show that hemiphractine hylids are not closely related to other hylids and should be recognized as a distinct family. They also show that the speciose genus Hyla is polyphyletic, but that its species can be arranged into three monophyletic genera. A new classification of hylid frogs is proposed. Several potentially misleading signals in the morphological data are discussed.",
keywords = "Amphibians, Anurans, Combined analysis, Hylid frogs, Missing data, Taxon sampling",
author = "Wiens, {John J} and Fetzner, {James W.} and Parkinson, {Christopher L.} and Reeder, {Tod W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10635150500234625",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "719--748",
journal = "Systematic Biology",
issn = "1063-5157",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades

AU - Wiens, John J

AU - Fetzner, James W.

AU - Parkinson, Christopher L.

AU - Reeder, Tod W.

PY - 2005/10/1

Y1 - 2005/10/1

N2 - How should characters and taxa be sampled to resolve efficiently the phylogeny of ancient and highly speciose groups? We addressed this question empirically in the treefrog family Hylidae, which contains >800 species and may be nonmonophyletic with respect to other anuran families. We sampled 81 species (54 hylids and 27 outgroups) for two mitochondrial genes (12S, ND1), two nuclear genes (POMC, c-myc), and morphology (144 characters) in an attempt to resolve higher-level relationships. We then added 117 taxa to the combined data set, many of which were sampled for only one gene (12S). Despite the relative incompleteness of the majority of taxa, the resulting trees placed all taxa in the expected higher-level clades with strong support, despite some taxa being >90% incomplete. Furthermore, we found no relationship between the completeness of a taxon and the support (parsimony bootstrap or Bayesian posterior probabilities) for its localized placement on the tree. Separate analysis of the data set with the most taxa (12S) gives a somewhat problematic estimate of higher-level relationships, suggesting that data sets scored only for some taxa (ND1, nuclear genes, morphology) are important in determining the outcome of the combined analysis. The results show that hemiphractine hylids are not closely related to other hylids and should be recognized as a distinct family. They also show that the speciose genus Hyla is polyphyletic, but that its species can be arranged into three monophyletic genera. A new classification of hylid frogs is proposed. Several potentially misleading signals in the morphological data are discussed.

AB - How should characters and taxa be sampled to resolve efficiently the phylogeny of ancient and highly speciose groups? We addressed this question empirically in the treefrog family Hylidae, which contains >800 species and may be nonmonophyletic with respect to other anuran families. We sampled 81 species (54 hylids and 27 outgroups) for two mitochondrial genes (12S, ND1), two nuclear genes (POMC, c-myc), and morphology (144 characters) in an attempt to resolve higher-level relationships. We then added 117 taxa to the combined data set, many of which were sampled for only one gene (12S). Despite the relative incompleteness of the majority of taxa, the resulting trees placed all taxa in the expected higher-level clades with strong support, despite some taxa being >90% incomplete. Furthermore, we found no relationship between the completeness of a taxon and the support (parsimony bootstrap or Bayesian posterior probabilities) for its localized placement on the tree. Separate analysis of the data set with the most taxa (12S) gives a somewhat problematic estimate of higher-level relationships, suggesting that data sets scored only for some taxa (ND1, nuclear genes, morphology) are important in determining the outcome of the combined analysis. The results show that hemiphractine hylids are not closely related to other hylids and should be recognized as a distinct family. They also show that the speciose genus Hyla is polyphyletic, but that its species can be arranged into three monophyletic genera. A new classification of hylid frogs is proposed. Several potentially misleading signals in the morphological data are discussed.

KW - Amphibians

KW - Anurans

KW - Combined analysis

KW - Hylid frogs

KW - Missing data

KW - Taxon sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28644436536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28644436536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10635150500234625

DO - 10.1080/10635150500234625

M3 - Article

C2 - 16243760

AN - SCOPUS:28644436536

VL - 54

SP - 719

EP - 748

JO - Systematic Biology

JF - Systematic Biology

SN - 1063-5157

IS - 5

ER -