Ideal theory

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a particular kind of ideal theory that does not work: namely, theorizing about ideally just worlds. Such theorizing fails to bear on what we have reason to regard as an ideal response here and now, and instead bears only on what would be ideal if we were to depart far enough from the human condition as it really is. An alternative kind of ideal theory, realistic idealism, is more useful: namely, theorizing about ideal responses to a sober assessment of circumstances that demand a response here and now. Where there are facts, where facts are subject to change in ways that matter, and where there is something we can do, we have a problem. Where there are problems, there can be objectives. Where there are objectives, there can be theorizing with a point.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages327-345
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9780199645121
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Human Condition
Idealism

Keywords

  • Bernard williams
  • Compliance problem
  • Ideal justice
  • Justice
  • Mutual advantage
  • Political idealism
  • Political moralism
  • Political realism
  • Utopia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Schmidtz, D. J. (2018). Ideal theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice (pp. 327-345). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.31

Ideal theory. / Schmidtz, David J.

The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 327-345.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Schmidtz, DJ 2018, Ideal theory. in The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press, pp. 327-345. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.31
Schmidtz DJ. Ideal theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press. 2018. p. 327-345 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.31
Schmidtz, David J. / Ideal theory. The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press, 2018. pp. 327-345
@inbook{48ba280037fa4e0a9bc8d529c8f495ba,
title = "Ideal theory",
abstract = "There is a particular kind of ideal theory that does not work: namely, theorizing about ideally just worlds. Such theorizing fails to bear on what we have reason to regard as an ideal response here and now, and instead bears only on what would be ideal if we were to depart far enough from the human condition as it really is. An alternative kind of ideal theory, realistic idealism, is more useful: namely, theorizing about ideal responses to a sober assessment of circumstances that demand a response here and now. Where there are facts, where facts are subject to change in ways that matter, and where there is something we can do, we have a problem. Where there are problems, there can be objectives. Where there are objectives, there can be theorizing with a point.",
keywords = "Bernard williams, Compliance problem, Ideal justice, Justice, Mutual advantage, Political idealism, Political moralism, Political realism, Utopia",
author = "Schmidtz, {David J}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.31",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "327--345",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ideal theory

AU - Schmidtz, David J

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - There is a particular kind of ideal theory that does not work: namely, theorizing about ideally just worlds. Such theorizing fails to bear on what we have reason to regard as an ideal response here and now, and instead bears only on what would be ideal if we were to depart far enough from the human condition as it really is. An alternative kind of ideal theory, realistic idealism, is more useful: namely, theorizing about ideal responses to a sober assessment of circumstances that demand a response here and now. Where there are facts, where facts are subject to change in ways that matter, and where there is something we can do, we have a problem. Where there are problems, there can be objectives. Where there are objectives, there can be theorizing with a point.

AB - There is a particular kind of ideal theory that does not work: namely, theorizing about ideally just worlds. Such theorizing fails to bear on what we have reason to regard as an ideal response here and now, and instead bears only on what would be ideal if we were to depart far enough from the human condition as it really is. An alternative kind of ideal theory, realistic idealism, is more useful: namely, theorizing about ideal responses to a sober assessment of circumstances that demand a response here and now. Where there are facts, where facts are subject to change in ways that matter, and where there is something we can do, we have a problem. Where there are problems, there can be objectives. Where there are objectives, there can be theorizing with a point.

KW - Bernard williams

KW - Compliance problem

KW - Ideal justice

KW - Justice

KW - Mutual advantage

KW - Political idealism

KW - Political moralism

KW - Political realism

KW - Utopia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051615477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051615477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.31

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.31

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85051615477

SP - 327

EP - 345

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -