Identification of adults with developmental language impairments

Lesley J. Fidler, Elena M Plante, Rebecca Vance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the utility of a wide range of language measures (phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics) for the identification of adults with developmental language impairment. Method: Measures were administered to 3 groups of adults, each representing a population expected to demonstrate high levels of language impairment, and to matched control groups. Results: Three measures were the strongest contributors to identification of language impairment in the 3 groups of adults. These measures,combined, maximized identification of members of the clinical groups as having impaired language (sensitivity) and members of the control groups as having typical language (specificity). Conclusion: This suggests that a relatively brief battery could have utility for identifying developmental language impairment during the adult years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2-13
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Language
language
Group
Control Groups
phonology
Semantics
syntax
Research Design
semantics
Population

Keywords

  • Adults
  • Assessment
  • Learning disability
  • Specific language impairment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Identification of adults with developmental language impairments. / Fidler, Lesley J.; Plante, Elena M; Vance, Rebecca.

In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 2-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6da85d2bb1f14cc2909882525f53bd93,
title = "Identification of adults with developmental language impairments",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the utility of a wide range of language measures (phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics) for the identification of adults with developmental language impairment. Method: Measures were administered to 3 groups of adults, each representing a population expected to demonstrate high levels of language impairment, and to matched control groups. Results: Three measures were the strongest contributors to identification of language impairment in the 3 groups of adults. These measures,combined, maximized identification of members of the clinical groups as having impaired language (sensitivity) and members of the control groups as having typical language (specificity). Conclusion: This suggests that a relatively brief battery could have utility for identifying developmental language impairment during the adult years.",
keywords = "Adults, Assessment, Learning disability, Specific language impairment",
author = "Fidler, {Lesley J.} and Plante, {Elena M} and Rebecca Vance",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0096)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "2--13",
journal = "American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1058-0360",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of adults with developmental language impairments

AU - Fidler, Lesley J.

AU - Plante, Elena M

AU - Vance, Rebecca

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Purpose: To assess the utility of a wide range of language measures (phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics) for the identification of adults with developmental language impairment. Method: Measures were administered to 3 groups of adults, each representing a population expected to demonstrate high levels of language impairment, and to matched control groups. Results: Three measures were the strongest contributors to identification of language impairment in the 3 groups of adults. These measures,combined, maximized identification of members of the clinical groups as having impaired language (sensitivity) and members of the control groups as having typical language (specificity). Conclusion: This suggests that a relatively brief battery could have utility for identifying developmental language impairment during the adult years.

AB - Purpose: To assess the utility of a wide range of language measures (phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics) for the identification of adults with developmental language impairment. Method: Measures were administered to 3 groups of adults, each representing a population expected to demonstrate high levels of language impairment, and to matched control groups. Results: Three measures were the strongest contributors to identification of language impairment in the 3 groups of adults. These measures,combined, maximized identification of members of the clinical groups as having impaired language (sensitivity) and members of the control groups as having typical language (specificity). Conclusion: This suggests that a relatively brief battery could have utility for identifying developmental language impairment during the adult years.

KW - Adults

KW - Assessment

KW - Learning disability

KW - Specific language impairment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751474538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751474538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0096)

DO - 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0096)

M3 - Article

C2 - 20739630

AN - SCOPUS:79751474538

VL - 20

SP - 2

EP - 13

JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1058-0360

IS - 1

ER -