Identities and intersectionality: A case for purposive sampling in survey-experimental research

Samara Klar, Thomas J. Leeper

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter begins by reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches for obtaining samples of intersectional identity groups, and then provides some empirical evidence for the viability of general population samples for providing large numbers of respondents from intersectional identity groups. Purposive sampling can be thought of as a subset of convenience sampling, in that respondents are chosen subjectively. While convenience sampling necessarily relies upon untestable assumptions rather than probability-based sampling methods, the chapter argues that such methods may be more appropriate for survey-experimental research than for observational research. For the purposes of experimental research on small intersectional identity groups, many purposive samples may be fit for use because they trade off design-based representativeness against obtaining a sample size sufficiently large to powerfully estimate an experimental effect size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationExperimental Methods in Survey Research
Subtitle of host publicationTechniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment
PublisherWiley
Pages419-433
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781119083771
ISBN (Print)9781119083740
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 30 2019

Keywords

  • Empirical evidence
  • Intersectional identity groups
  • Population samples
  • Probability-based sampling methods
  • Purposive sampling
  • Representative samples
  • Survey-experimental research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identities and intersectionality: A case for purposive sampling in survey-experimental research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this