Imaging in appendicitis: A review with special emphasis on the treatment of women

Leigh A Neumayer, Anne Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Acute abdominal pain in women often presents the clinician with a diagnostic dilemma, especially if it is lower abdominal pain. Appendicitis is frequently entertained as a diagnosis, but until recently, the gold standard diagnostic procedure was operation, carrying a high false-negative rate. In recent years, computed tomographic (CT) scan has been advocated as a diagnostic aid. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of CT scan in diagnosing appendicitis. DATA SOURCES: Investigators searched PubMed between January and July 2003 using the terms "CT scan" and "appendicitis" with the limits "All adults 19+ years" and "English [language]." In addition, reference lists of all obtained articles were reviewed for other potential citations. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All prospective studies of adults published in English were considered. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Initial searches and reviews yielded 248 citations. Twenty-three of the citations reported prospective studies; only two of these were randomized studies. Prospective studies report sensitivities ranging from 77% to 100%, specificities ranging from 83% to 100%, and accuracies ranging from 88% to 98% for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Information gained from CT scans in patients with suspected appendicitis results in alternative diagnosis in 6% to 36%. These values are similar for both men and women. CONCLUSION: The data support routine use of CT scan in both men and women for the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1404-1409
Number of pages6
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume102
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appendicitis
Prospective Studies
Abdominal Pain
Therapeutics
Acute Pain
PubMed
Language
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Imaging in appendicitis : A review with special emphasis on the treatment of women. / Neumayer, Leigh A; Kennedy, Anne.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 102, No. 6, 12.2003, p. 1404-1409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5fa760493644a6083a6c9872ce6f2a1,
title = "Imaging in appendicitis: A review with special emphasis on the treatment of women",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Acute abdominal pain in women often presents the clinician with a diagnostic dilemma, especially if it is lower abdominal pain. Appendicitis is frequently entertained as a diagnosis, but until recently, the gold standard diagnostic procedure was operation, carrying a high false-negative rate. In recent years, computed tomographic (CT) scan has been advocated as a diagnostic aid. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of CT scan in diagnosing appendicitis. DATA SOURCES: Investigators searched PubMed between January and July 2003 using the terms {"}CT scan{"} and {"}appendicitis{"} with the limits {"}All adults 19+ years{"} and {"}English [language].{"} In addition, reference lists of all obtained articles were reviewed for other potential citations. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All prospective studies of adults published in English were considered. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Initial searches and reviews yielded 248 citations. Twenty-three of the citations reported prospective studies; only two of these were randomized studies. Prospective studies report sensitivities ranging from 77{\%} to 100{\%}, specificities ranging from 83{\%} to 100{\%}, and accuracies ranging from 88{\%} to 98{\%} for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Information gained from CT scans in patients with suspected appendicitis results in alternative diagnosis in 6{\%} to 36{\%}. These values are similar for both men and women. CONCLUSION: The data support routine use of CT scan in both men and women for the diagnosis of appendicitis.",
author = "Neumayer, {Leigh A} and Anne Kennedy",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.08.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1404--1409",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging in appendicitis

T2 - A review with special emphasis on the treatment of women

AU - Neumayer, Leigh A

AU - Kennedy, Anne

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Acute abdominal pain in women often presents the clinician with a diagnostic dilemma, especially if it is lower abdominal pain. Appendicitis is frequently entertained as a diagnosis, but until recently, the gold standard diagnostic procedure was operation, carrying a high false-negative rate. In recent years, computed tomographic (CT) scan has been advocated as a diagnostic aid. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of CT scan in diagnosing appendicitis. DATA SOURCES: Investigators searched PubMed between January and July 2003 using the terms "CT scan" and "appendicitis" with the limits "All adults 19+ years" and "English [language]." In addition, reference lists of all obtained articles were reviewed for other potential citations. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All prospective studies of adults published in English were considered. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Initial searches and reviews yielded 248 citations. Twenty-three of the citations reported prospective studies; only two of these were randomized studies. Prospective studies report sensitivities ranging from 77% to 100%, specificities ranging from 83% to 100%, and accuracies ranging from 88% to 98% for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Information gained from CT scans in patients with suspected appendicitis results in alternative diagnosis in 6% to 36%. These values are similar for both men and women. CONCLUSION: The data support routine use of CT scan in both men and women for the diagnosis of appendicitis.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Acute abdominal pain in women often presents the clinician with a diagnostic dilemma, especially if it is lower abdominal pain. Appendicitis is frequently entertained as a diagnosis, but until recently, the gold standard diagnostic procedure was operation, carrying a high false-negative rate. In recent years, computed tomographic (CT) scan has been advocated as a diagnostic aid. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of CT scan in diagnosing appendicitis. DATA SOURCES: Investigators searched PubMed between January and July 2003 using the terms "CT scan" and "appendicitis" with the limits "All adults 19+ years" and "English [language]." In addition, reference lists of all obtained articles were reviewed for other potential citations. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All prospective studies of adults published in English were considered. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Initial searches and reviews yielded 248 citations. Twenty-three of the citations reported prospective studies; only two of these were randomized studies. Prospective studies report sensitivities ranging from 77% to 100%, specificities ranging from 83% to 100%, and accuracies ranging from 88% to 98% for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Information gained from CT scans in patients with suspected appendicitis results in alternative diagnosis in 6% to 36%. These values are similar for both men and women. CONCLUSION: The data support routine use of CT scan in both men and women for the diagnosis of appendicitis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345118214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345118214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.08.014

DO - 10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.08.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 14662234

AN - SCOPUS:0345118214

VL - 102

SP - 1404

EP - 1409

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 6

ER -