Impact of the privacy rule on the study of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest

Marilyn C. Morris, C. Crawford Mechem, Robert A. Berg, Bentley J Bobrow, Starla Burns, Lani Clark, Valerie J. De Maio, Monique Kusick, Neal J. Richmond, Ian Stiell, Vinay M. Nadkarni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction. The Privacy Rule, a follow-up to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, limits distribution of protected health information. Compliance with the Privacy Rule is particularly challenging for prehospital research, because investigators often seek data from multiple emergency medical services (EMS) and receiving hospitals. Objective. To describe the impact of the Privacy Rule on prehospital research and to present strategies to optimize data collection in compliance with the Privacy Rule. Methods. The CanAm Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrest Study Group has previously conducted a multicentered observational study involving children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In the current study, we used a survey to assess site-specific methods of compliance with the Privacy Rule and the extent to which such strategies were successful. Results. The previously conducted observational study included collection of data from a total of 66 EMS agencies (range of 1-37 per site). Data collection from EMS providers was complicated by the lack of a systematic approval mechanism for the research use of EMS records and by incomplete resuscitation records. Agencies approached for approval to release EMS data for study purposes included Department of Health Institutional Review Boards, Fire Commissioners, and Commissioners of Health. The observational study included collection of data from a total of 164 receiving hospitals (range of 1-63 per site). Data collection from receiving hospitals was complicated by the varying requirements of receiving hospitals for the release of patient survival data. Conclusions. Obtaining complete EMS and hospital data is challenging but is vital to the conduct of prehospital research. Obtaining approval from city or state level IRBs or Privacy Boards may help optimize data collection. Uniformity of methods to adhere to regulatory requirements would ease the conduct of prehospital research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-277
Number of pages6
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Privacy
Emergency Medical Services
Observational Studies
Research
Research Ethics Committees
Health
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Heart Arrest
Resuscitation
Medical Records
Research Personnel
Pediatrics
Survival

Keywords

  • HIPAA
  • Pediatric research
  • Privacy rule
  • Resuscitation research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Morris, M. C., Mechem, C. C., Berg, R. A., Bobrow, B. J., Burns, S., Clark, L., ... Nadkarni, V. M. (2007). Impact of the privacy rule on the study of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest. Prehospital Emergency Care, 11(3), 272-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120701348123

Impact of the privacy rule on the study of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest. / Morris, Marilyn C.; Mechem, C. Crawford; Berg, Robert A.; Bobrow, Bentley J; Burns, Starla; Clark, Lani; De Maio, Valerie J.; Kusick, Monique; Richmond, Neal J.; Stiell, Ian; Nadkarni, Vinay M.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 11, No. 3, 07.2007, p. 272-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morris, MC, Mechem, CC, Berg, RA, Bobrow, BJ, Burns, S, Clark, L, De Maio, VJ, Kusick, M, Richmond, NJ, Stiell, I & Nadkarni, VM 2007, 'Impact of the privacy rule on the study of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest', Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 272-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120701348123
Morris, Marilyn C. ; Mechem, C. Crawford ; Berg, Robert A. ; Bobrow, Bentley J ; Burns, Starla ; Clark, Lani ; De Maio, Valerie J. ; Kusick, Monique ; Richmond, Neal J. ; Stiell, Ian ; Nadkarni, Vinay M. / Impact of the privacy rule on the study of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2007 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 272-277.
@article{e84f66cd5ef94e4cbf3858c4acadb0ca,
title = "Impact of the privacy rule on the study of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest",
abstract = "Introduction. The Privacy Rule, a follow-up to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, limits distribution of protected health information. Compliance with the Privacy Rule is particularly challenging for prehospital research, because investigators often seek data from multiple emergency medical services (EMS) and receiving hospitals. Objective. To describe the impact of the Privacy Rule on prehospital research and to present strategies to optimize data collection in compliance with the Privacy Rule. Methods. The CanAm Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrest Study Group has previously conducted a multicentered observational study involving children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In the current study, we used a survey to assess site-specific methods of compliance with the Privacy Rule and the extent to which such strategies were successful. Results. The previously conducted observational study included collection of data from a total of 66 EMS agencies (range of 1-37 per site). Data collection from EMS providers was complicated by the lack of a systematic approval mechanism for the research use of EMS records and by incomplete resuscitation records. Agencies approached for approval to release EMS data for study purposes included Department of Health Institutional Review Boards, Fire Commissioners, and Commissioners of Health. The observational study included collection of data from a total of 164 receiving hospitals (range of 1-63 per site). Data collection from receiving hospitals was complicated by the varying requirements of receiving hospitals for the release of patient survival data. Conclusions. Obtaining complete EMS and hospital data is challenging but is vital to the conduct of prehospital research. Obtaining approval from city or state level IRBs or Privacy Boards may help optimize data collection. Uniformity of methods to adhere to regulatory requirements would ease the conduct of prehospital research.",
keywords = "HIPAA, Pediatric research, Privacy rule, Resuscitation research",
author = "Morris, {Marilyn C.} and Mechem, {C. Crawford} and Berg, {Robert A.} and Bobrow, {Bentley J} and Starla Burns and Lani Clark and {De Maio}, {Valerie J.} and Monique Kusick and Richmond, {Neal J.} and Ian Stiell and Nadkarni, {Vinay M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/10903120701348123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "272--277",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of the privacy rule on the study of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest

AU - Morris, Marilyn C.

AU - Mechem, C. Crawford

AU - Berg, Robert A.

AU - Bobrow, Bentley J

AU - Burns, Starla

AU - Clark, Lani

AU - De Maio, Valerie J.

AU - Kusick, Monique

AU - Richmond, Neal J.

AU - Stiell, Ian

AU - Nadkarni, Vinay M.

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Introduction. The Privacy Rule, a follow-up to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, limits distribution of protected health information. Compliance with the Privacy Rule is particularly challenging for prehospital research, because investigators often seek data from multiple emergency medical services (EMS) and receiving hospitals. Objective. To describe the impact of the Privacy Rule on prehospital research and to present strategies to optimize data collection in compliance with the Privacy Rule. Methods. The CanAm Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrest Study Group has previously conducted a multicentered observational study involving children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In the current study, we used a survey to assess site-specific methods of compliance with the Privacy Rule and the extent to which such strategies were successful. Results. The previously conducted observational study included collection of data from a total of 66 EMS agencies (range of 1-37 per site). Data collection from EMS providers was complicated by the lack of a systematic approval mechanism for the research use of EMS records and by incomplete resuscitation records. Agencies approached for approval to release EMS data for study purposes included Department of Health Institutional Review Boards, Fire Commissioners, and Commissioners of Health. The observational study included collection of data from a total of 164 receiving hospitals (range of 1-63 per site). Data collection from receiving hospitals was complicated by the varying requirements of receiving hospitals for the release of patient survival data. Conclusions. Obtaining complete EMS and hospital data is challenging but is vital to the conduct of prehospital research. Obtaining approval from city or state level IRBs or Privacy Boards may help optimize data collection. Uniformity of methods to adhere to regulatory requirements would ease the conduct of prehospital research.

AB - Introduction. The Privacy Rule, a follow-up to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, limits distribution of protected health information. Compliance with the Privacy Rule is particularly challenging for prehospital research, because investigators often seek data from multiple emergency medical services (EMS) and receiving hospitals. Objective. To describe the impact of the Privacy Rule on prehospital research and to present strategies to optimize data collection in compliance with the Privacy Rule. Methods. The CanAm Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrest Study Group has previously conducted a multicentered observational study involving children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In the current study, we used a survey to assess site-specific methods of compliance with the Privacy Rule and the extent to which such strategies were successful. Results. The previously conducted observational study included collection of data from a total of 66 EMS agencies (range of 1-37 per site). Data collection from EMS providers was complicated by the lack of a systematic approval mechanism for the research use of EMS records and by incomplete resuscitation records. Agencies approached for approval to release EMS data for study purposes included Department of Health Institutional Review Boards, Fire Commissioners, and Commissioners of Health. The observational study included collection of data from a total of 164 receiving hospitals (range of 1-63 per site). Data collection from receiving hospitals was complicated by the varying requirements of receiving hospitals for the release of patient survival data. Conclusions. Obtaining complete EMS and hospital data is challenging but is vital to the conduct of prehospital research. Obtaining approval from city or state level IRBs or Privacy Boards may help optimize data collection. Uniformity of methods to adhere to regulatory requirements would ease the conduct of prehospital research.

KW - HIPAA

KW - Pediatric research

KW - Privacy rule

KW - Resuscitation research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447120720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447120720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120701348123

DO - 10.1080/10903120701348123

M3 - Article

C2 - 17613899

AN - SCOPUS:34447120720

VL - 11

SP - 272

EP - 277

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 3

ER -