Improved estimation of clay content from water content for soils rich in smectite and kaolinite

Emmanuel Arthur, Markus Tuller, Trine Norgaard, Per Moldrup, Lis W. de Jonge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Standard measurement methods for soil clay content, including the hydrometer and pipette methods, are laborious and difficult to repeat. This has motivated the application of proxy methods such as estimation of clay content from soil water vapor sorption isotherms. Previous studies have revealed that vapor sorption-based clay estimates are inaccurate for soils dominated by swelling or highly weathered non-swelling clays such as kaolinite. In this study, we evaluate an existing vapor sorption-based clay estimation model for soils dominated by either illite (IL), smectite (SM), or kaolinite (KA) clay minerals, and propose modifications to account for high SM and KA contents. Compared to the pipette method, the clay content obtained from the existing water sorption model at 50% relative humidity (RH) was accurate for the IL samples, but significantly overestimated (RMSE = 23.7%; ME = 19.7%) or underestimated (RMSE = 28.8%; ME = −17.0%) clay content for SM and KA rich soils, respectively. The proposed modification involves correcting the estimated clay content with a “slope factor”, S for RH values ranging from 30 to 90% for both adsorption and desorption. For SM samples, S averaged 0.76 and 0.72 for adsorption and desorption, respectively, and for KA samples, S ranged from 2.26 to 1.19 and followed a polynomial relationship with RH. Comparison of the estimated clay content from the modified models showed markedly improved estimation of the measured clay content (for RH of 90%, RMSE = 8.0%; ME = 2.6% for SM samples and RMSE = 9.6%; ME = −5.7% for KA samples).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-45
Number of pages6
JournalGeoderma
Volume350
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2019

Fingerprint

smectite
kaolinite
soil water content
clay
water content
soil
relative humidity
sorption
illite
vapors
desorption
adsorption
sampling
hydrometers
sorption isotherms
measurement method
clay minerals
water vapor
clay soil
application methods

Keywords

  • Hygroscopic water
  • Montmorillonite
  • Soil texture
  • Vapor sorption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science

Cite this

Improved estimation of clay content from water content for soils rich in smectite and kaolinite. / Arthur, Emmanuel; Tuller, Markus; Norgaard, Trine; Moldrup, Per; de Jonge, Lis W.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 350, 15.09.2019, p. 40-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arthur, Emmanuel ; Tuller, Markus ; Norgaard, Trine ; Moldrup, Per ; de Jonge, Lis W. / Improved estimation of clay content from water content for soils rich in smectite and kaolinite. In: Geoderma. 2019 ; Vol. 350. pp. 40-45.
@article{17886ccac76941a5bc8ccea7a2c9d624,
title = "Improved estimation of clay content from water content for soils rich in smectite and kaolinite",
abstract = "Standard measurement methods for soil clay content, including the hydrometer and pipette methods, are laborious and difficult to repeat. This has motivated the application of proxy methods such as estimation of clay content from soil water vapor sorption isotherms. Previous studies have revealed that vapor sorption-based clay estimates are inaccurate for soils dominated by swelling or highly weathered non-swelling clays such as kaolinite. In this study, we evaluate an existing vapor sorption-based clay estimation model for soils dominated by either illite (IL), smectite (SM), or kaolinite (KA) clay minerals, and propose modifications to account for high SM and KA contents. Compared to the pipette method, the clay content obtained from the existing water sorption model at 50{\%} relative humidity (RH) was accurate for the IL samples, but significantly overestimated (RMSE = 23.7{\%}; ME = 19.7{\%}) or underestimated (RMSE = 28.8{\%}; ME = −17.0{\%}) clay content for SM and KA rich soils, respectively. The proposed modification involves correcting the estimated clay content with a “slope factor”, S for RH values ranging from 30 to 90{\%} for both adsorption and desorption. For SM samples, S averaged 0.76 and 0.72 for adsorption and desorption, respectively, and for KA samples, S ranged from 2.26 to 1.19 and followed a polynomial relationship with RH. Comparison of the estimated clay content from the modified models showed markedly improved estimation of the measured clay content (for RH of 90{\%}, RMSE = 8.0{\%}; ME = 2.6{\%} for SM samples and RMSE = 9.6{\%}; ME = −5.7{\%} for KA samples).",
keywords = "Hygroscopic water, Montmorillonite, Soil texture, Vapor sorption",
author = "Emmanuel Arthur and Markus Tuller and Trine Norgaard and Per Moldrup and {de Jonge}, {Lis W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "350",
pages = "40--45",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved estimation of clay content from water content for soils rich in smectite and kaolinite

AU - Arthur, Emmanuel

AU - Tuller, Markus

AU - Norgaard, Trine

AU - Moldrup, Per

AU - de Jonge, Lis W.

PY - 2019/9/15

Y1 - 2019/9/15

N2 - Standard measurement methods for soil clay content, including the hydrometer and pipette methods, are laborious and difficult to repeat. This has motivated the application of proxy methods such as estimation of clay content from soil water vapor sorption isotherms. Previous studies have revealed that vapor sorption-based clay estimates are inaccurate for soils dominated by swelling or highly weathered non-swelling clays such as kaolinite. In this study, we evaluate an existing vapor sorption-based clay estimation model for soils dominated by either illite (IL), smectite (SM), or kaolinite (KA) clay minerals, and propose modifications to account for high SM and KA contents. Compared to the pipette method, the clay content obtained from the existing water sorption model at 50% relative humidity (RH) was accurate for the IL samples, but significantly overestimated (RMSE = 23.7%; ME = 19.7%) or underestimated (RMSE = 28.8%; ME = −17.0%) clay content for SM and KA rich soils, respectively. The proposed modification involves correcting the estimated clay content with a “slope factor”, S for RH values ranging from 30 to 90% for both adsorption and desorption. For SM samples, S averaged 0.76 and 0.72 for adsorption and desorption, respectively, and for KA samples, S ranged from 2.26 to 1.19 and followed a polynomial relationship with RH. Comparison of the estimated clay content from the modified models showed markedly improved estimation of the measured clay content (for RH of 90%, RMSE = 8.0%; ME = 2.6% for SM samples and RMSE = 9.6%; ME = −5.7% for KA samples).

AB - Standard measurement methods for soil clay content, including the hydrometer and pipette methods, are laborious and difficult to repeat. This has motivated the application of proxy methods such as estimation of clay content from soil water vapor sorption isotherms. Previous studies have revealed that vapor sorption-based clay estimates are inaccurate for soils dominated by swelling or highly weathered non-swelling clays such as kaolinite. In this study, we evaluate an existing vapor sorption-based clay estimation model for soils dominated by either illite (IL), smectite (SM), or kaolinite (KA) clay minerals, and propose modifications to account for high SM and KA contents. Compared to the pipette method, the clay content obtained from the existing water sorption model at 50% relative humidity (RH) was accurate for the IL samples, but significantly overestimated (RMSE = 23.7%; ME = 19.7%) or underestimated (RMSE = 28.8%; ME = −17.0%) clay content for SM and KA rich soils, respectively. The proposed modification involves correcting the estimated clay content with a “slope factor”, S for RH values ranging from 30 to 90% for both adsorption and desorption. For SM samples, S averaged 0.76 and 0.72 for adsorption and desorption, respectively, and for KA samples, S ranged from 2.26 to 1.19 and followed a polynomial relationship with RH. Comparison of the estimated clay content from the modified models showed markedly improved estimation of the measured clay content (for RH of 90%, RMSE = 8.0%; ME = 2.6% for SM samples and RMSE = 9.6%; ME = −5.7% for KA samples).

KW - Hygroscopic water

KW - Montmorillonite

KW - Soil texture

KW - Vapor sorption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065704674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065704674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.018

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065704674

VL - 350

SP - 40

EP - 45

JO - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

ER -