Improvement following total knee replacement surgery: Exploring preoperative symptoms and change in preoperative symptoms

Ernest R. Vina, Michael J. Hannon, Chian K Kwoh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether changes in preoperative osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms are associated with improvement after total knee replacement (TKR) and to identify predictors of clinically significant improvement. Methods: Data on Osteoarthritis Initiative participants who were annually assessed and underwent TKR were included. T0 was the assessment prior to TKR while T-1 was the assessment prior to that. T+2 was the second assessment after TKR. We compiled data on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), OA-related symptoms, and radiographic severity. We defined clinically significant improvement as improvement in WOMAC total score ≥ to the minimal important difference (MID) (0.5 SD of mean change) between T0 and T+2 and also considered other definitions of improvement. Logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the relationship between improvement and preoperative measures. Results: Improved (n = 211) compared to unimproved (n = 58) patients had greater worsening of their WOMAC pain (p = 0.002) and disability (p <0.001) from T-1 to T0. Preoperative measures as predictors of improvement included higher WOMAC disability (OR = 1.08, p <0.001), presence of chronic OA symptoms in the surgical knee (OR = 5.77, p = 0.033), absence of OA-related symptoms in the contralateral knee (OR = 9.25, p <0.001), exposure to frequent knee bending (OR = 3.46, p = 0.040), and having a Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of ≥2 in the contralateral knee (OR = 4.71, p = 0.010). Conclusions: More than 75% of participants had improvement after TKR. Improved patients were more likely to have escalation of OA pain and disability prior to surgery than unimproved patients. Other preoperative measures predicted improvement after TKR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)547-555
Number of pages9
JournalSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Osteoarthritis
Knee
Logistic Models
Pain
Ontario
X-Rays

Keywords

  • Improvement
  • Joint replacement surgery
  • Knee
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Postoperative outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Improvement following total knee replacement surgery : Exploring preoperative symptoms and change in preoperative symptoms. / Vina, Ernest R.; Hannon, Michael J.; Kwoh, Chian K.

In: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, Vol. 45, No. 5, 01.04.2016, p. 547-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ff89ee48d914c04b2dd4fbce0ac11ca,
title = "Improvement following total knee replacement surgery: Exploring preoperative symptoms and change in preoperative symptoms",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether changes in preoperative osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms are associated with improvement after total knee replacement (TKR) and to identify predictors of clinically significant improvement. Methods: Data on Osteoarthritis Initiative participants who were annually assessed and underwent TKR were included. T0 was the assessment prior to TKR while T-1 was the assessment prior to that. T+2 was the second assessment after TKR. We compiled data on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), OA-related symptoms, and radiographic severity. We defined clinically significant improvement as improvement in WOMAC total score ≥ to the minimal important difference (MID) (0.5 SD of mean change) between T0 and T+2 and also considered other definitions of improvement. Logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the relationship between improvement and preoperative measures. Results: Improved (n = 211) compared to unimproved (n = 58) patients had greater worsening of their WOMAC pain (p = 0.002) and disability (p <0.001) from T-1 to T0. Preoperative measures as predictors of improvement included higher WOMAC disability (OR = 1.08, p <0.001), presence of chronic OA symptoms in the surgical knee (OR = 5.77, p = 0.033), absence of OA-related symptoms in the contralateral knee (OR = 9.25, p <0.001), exposure to frequent knee bending (OR = 3.46, p = 0.040), and having a Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of ≥2 in the contralateral knee (OR = 4.71, p = 0.010). Conclusions: More than 75{\%} of participants had improvement after TKR. Improved patients were more likely to have escalation of OA pain and disability prior to surgery than unimproved patients. Other preoperative measures predicted improvement after TKR.",
keywords = "Improvement, Joint replacement surgery, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Postoperative outcomes",
author = "Vina, {Ernest R.} and Hannon, {Michael J.} and Kwoh, {Chian K}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "547--555",
journal = "Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism",
issn = "0049-0172",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improvement following total knee replacement surgery

T2 - Exploring preoperative symptoms and change in preoperative symptoms

AU - Vina, Ernest R.

AU - Hannon, Michael J.

AU - Kwoh, Chian K

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Objective: To determine whether changes in preoperative osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms are associated with improvement after total knee replacement (TKR) and to identify predictors of clinically significant improvement. Methods: Data on Osteoarthritis Initiative participants who were annually assessed and underwent TKR were included. T0 was the assessment prior to TKR while T-1 was the assessment prior to that. T+2 was the second assessment after TKR. We compiled data on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), OA-related symptoms, and radiographic severity. We defined clinically significant improvement as improvement in WOMAC total score ≥ to the minimal important difference (MID) (0.5 SD of mean change) between T0 and T+2 and also considered other definitions of improvement. Logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the relationship between improvement and preoperative measures. Results: Improved (n = 211) compared to unimproved (n = 58) patients had greater worsening of their WOMAC pain (p = 0.002) and disability (p <0.001) from T-1 to T0. Preoperative measures as predictors of improvement included higher WOMAC disability (OR = 1.08, p <0.001), presence of chronic OA symptoms in the surgical knee (OR = 5.77, p = 0.033), absence of OA-related symptoms in the contralateral knee (OR = 9.25, p <0.001), exposure to frequent knee bending (OR = 3.46, p = 0.040), and having a Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of ≥2 in the contralateral knee (OR = 4.71, p = 0.010). Conclusions: More than 75% of participants had improvement after TKR. Improved patients were more likely to have escalation of OA pain and disability prior to surgery than unimproved patients. Other preoperative measures predicted improvement after TKR.

AB - Objective: To determine whether changes in preoperative osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms are associated with improvement after total knee replacement (TKR) and to identify predictors of clinically significant improvement. Methods: Data on Osteoarthritis Initiative participants who were annually assessed and underwent TKR were included. T0 was the assessment prior to TKR while T-1 was the assessment prior to that. T+2 was the second assessment after TKR. We compiled data on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), OA-related symptoms, and radiographic severity. We defined clinically significant improvement as improvement in WOMAC total score ≥ to the minimal important difference (MID) (0.5 SD of mean change) between T0 and T+2 and also considered other definitions of improvement. Logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the relationship between improvement and preoperative measures. Results: Improved (n = 211) compared to unimproved (n = 58) patients had greater worsening of their WOMAC pain (p = 0.002) and disability (p <0.001) from T-1 to T0. Preoperative measures as predictors of improvement included higher WOMAC disability (OR = 1.08, p <0.001), presence of chronic OA symptoms in the surgical knee (OR = 5.77, p = 0.033), absence of OA-related symptoms in the contralateral knee (OR = 9.25, p <0.001), exposure to frequent knee bending (OR = 3.46, p = 0.040), and having a Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of ≥2 in the contralateral knee (OR = 4.71, p = 0.010). Conclusions: More than 75% of participants had improvement after TKR. Improved patients were more likely to have escalation of OA pain and disability prior to surgery than unimproved patients. Other preoperative measures predicted improvement after TKR.

KW - Improvement

KW - Joint replacement surgery

KW - Knee

KW - Osteoarthritis

KW - Postoperative outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961675575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961675575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.10.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 26573377

AN - SCOPUS:84961675575

VL - 45

SP - 547

EP - 555

JO - Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

JF - Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

SN - 0049-0172

IS - 5

ER -