In praise of exclusion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most theoretical accounts of descriptive representation focus almost exclusively on the question, Why do certain groups need to be brought into democratic institutions? They emphasize the democratic gains obtained through adding more voices to the political arena. However, in order to improve the representation of historically disadvantaged groups, democratic theorists need to consider when it is justifiable, desirable, and even morally necessary to limit, or even deny, access and influence to overrepresented, privileged groups. Democratic citizens need an ethics of marginalizationthat is, ethical standards for evaluating how democracies can and should use informal norms to limit the power and influence of certain citizens within the framework of an equal regime of formal rights. The author proposes one standard, the oppression principle, for evaluating how democratic citizens marginalize: democracies should marginalize those who oppress and those whose privileged status sustains oppression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1172-1186
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

exclusion
citizen
oppression
democracy
Group
moral philosophy
regime

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

In praise of exclusion. / Dovi, Suzanne L.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 71, No. 3, 07.2009, p. 1172-1186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dovi, Suzanne L. / In praise of exclusion. In: Journal of Politics. 2009 ; Vol. 71, No. 3. pp. 1172-1186.
@article{a33cc8c864cf4d239ec748f1761ed79a,
title = "In praise of exclusion",
abstract = "Most theoretical accounts of descriptive representation focus almost exclusively on the question, Why do certain groups need to be brought into democratic institutions? They emphasize the democratic gains obtained through adding more voices to the political arena. However, in order to improve the representation of historically disadvantaged groups, democratic theorists need to consider when it is justifiable, desirable, and even morally necessary to limit, or even deny, access and influence to overrepresented, privileged groups. Democratic citizens need an ethics of marginalizationthat is, ethical standards for evaluating how democracies can and should use informal norms to limit the power and influence of certain citizens within the framework of an equal regime of formal rights. The author proposes one standard, the oppression principle, for evaluating how democratic citizens marginalize: democracies should marginalize those who oppress and those whose privileged status sustains oppression.",
author = "Dovi, {Suzanne L}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S0022381609090951",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "1172--1186",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In praise of exclusion

AU - Dovi, Suzanne L

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Most theoretical accounts of descriptive representation focus almost exclusively on the question, Why do certain groups need to be brought into democratic institutions? They emphasize the democratic gains obtained through adding more voices to the political arena. However, in order to improve the representation of historically disadvantaged groups, democratic theorists need to consider when it is justifiable, desirable, and even morally necessary to limit, or even deny, access and influence to overrepresented, privileged groups. Democratic citizens need an ethics of marginalizationthat is, ethical standards for evaluating how democracies can and should use informal norms to limit the power and influence of certain citizens within the framework of an equal regime of formal rights. The author proposes one standard, the oppression principle, for evaluating how democratic citizens marginalize: democracies should marginalize those who oppress and those whose privileged status sustains oppression.

AB - Most theoretical accounts of descriptive representation focus almost exclusively on the question, Why do certain groups need to be brought into democratic institutions? They emphasize the democratic gains obtained through adding more voices to the political arena. However, in order to improve the representation of historically disadvantaged groups, democratic theorists need to consider when it is justifiable, desirable, and even morally necessary to limit, or even deny, access and influence to overrepresented, privileged groups. Democratic citizens need an ethics of marginalizationthat is, ethical standards for evaluating how democracies can and should use informal norms to limit the power and influence of certain citizens within the framework of an equal regime of formal rights. The author proposes one standard, the oppression principle, for evaluating how democratic citizens marginalize: democracies should marginalize those who oppress and those whose privileged status sustains oppression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70450208399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70450208399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0022381609090951

DO - 10.1017/S0022381609090951

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70450208399

VL - 71

SP - 1172

EP - 1186

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 3

ER -