In situ conservation of wild chiles and their biotic associates

Joshua Jordan Tewksbury, Gary P Nabhan, Donald Norman, Humberto Suzán, John Tuxill, Jim Donovan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wild congeners of domesticated crops increasingly serve as sources of genes for improving crop cultivars. Although wild congeners have been included in seed collections for ex situ storage, there has been little work to protect populations of these wild species in their natural habitats for in situ conservation. We assessed the distribution of chile plants (Capsicum annuum L. var. aviculare [Dierbach] D'Arcy and Eshbaugh) relative to the dominant woody vegetation of one subpopulation in a single drainage in southern Arizona, U.S.A. Wild chiles were not found in direct sun, and the distribution of chiles under different nurse plants could be a function of random chance, microenvironmental differences under different nurse-plant species, or nonrandom dispersal by chile consumers. To examine chile distribution, we measured the association of wild chiles with nurse-plant species and compared these associations with the available cover provided by each nurse plant. We also measured the buffering capacity of each nurse-plant species, conducted mammalian and avian food-preference experiments to determine the taxa dispersing chiles, and conducted time-budget studies of potential chile dispersal agents. Wild chiles were not randomly distributed: over 75% were under the canopies of fleshy-fruited shrubs that collectively made up less than 25% of the cover. We found limited evidence that differences in buffering capacity affected chile distribution. Food-preference experiments suggested that birds are the only effective dispersal agents, and the time budgets of three common bird species were strongly correlated with chile plant distribution. These results lend support for directed dispersal by avian consumers. The distribution of chiles appears to be a function of interactions between consumers, nurse plants, and the secondary chemicals in the chiles themselves. Only through studies of in situ populations can we understand the interactions that sustain both wild-crop relatives and the genetic variability essential to future crop management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-107
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Biology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1999

Fingerprint

nurse plant
Crops
Chile
Conservation
nurse plants
Birds
food preference
crop
buffering
Sun
Drainage
seed collection
Seed
Genes
Experiments
buffering capacity
subpopulation
food choices
in situ
distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

In situ conservation of wild chiles and their biotic associates. / Tewksbury, Joshua Jordan; Nabhan, Gary P; Norman, Donald; Suzán, Humberto; Tuxill, John; Donovan, Jim.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 02.1999, p. 98-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tewksbury, JJ, Nabhan, GP, Norman, D, Suzán, H, Tuxill, J & Donovan, J 1999, 'In situ conservation of wild chiles and their biotic associates', Conservation Biology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97399.x
Tewksbury, Joshua Jordan ; Nabhan, Gary P ; Norman, Donald ; Suzán, Humberto ; Tuxill, John ; Donovan, Jim. / In situ conservation of wild chiles and their biotic associates. In: Conservation Biology. 1999 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 98-107.
@article{75c125e494fa4d4aba54017d96052dc3,
title = "In situ conservation of wild chiles and their biotic associates",
abstract = "Wild congeners of domesticated crops increasingly serve as sources of genes for improving crop cultivars. Although wild congeners have been included in seed collections for ex situ storage, there has been little work to protect populations of these wild species in their natural habitats for in situ conservation. We assessed the distribution of chile plants (Capsicum annuum L. var. aviculare [Dierbach] D'Arcy and Eshbaugh) relative to the dominant woody vegetation of one subpopulation in a single drainage in southern Arizona, U.S.A. Wild chiles were not found in direct sun, and the distribution of chiles under different nurse plants could be a function of random chance, microenvironmental differences under different nurse-plant species, or nonrandom dispersal by chile consumers. To examine chile distribution, we measured the association of wild chiles with nurse-plant species and compared these associations with the available cover provided by each nurse plant. We also measured the buffering capacity of each nurse-plant species, conducted mammalian and avian food-preference experiments to determine the taxa dispersing chiles, and conducted time-budget studies of potential chile dispersal agents. Wild chiles were not randomly distributed: over 75{\%} were under the canopies of fleshy-fruited shrubs that collectively made up less than 25{\%} of the cover. We found limited evidence that differences in buffering capacity affected chile distribution. Food-preference experiments suggested that birds are the only effective dispersal agents, and the time budgets of three common bird species were strongly correlated with chile plant distribution. These results lend support for directed dispersal by avian consumers. The distribution of chiles appears to be a function of interactions between consumers, nurse plants, and the secondary chemicals in the chiles themselves. Only through studies of in situ populations can we understand the interactions that sustain both wild-crop relatives and the genetic variability essential to future crop management.",
author = "Tewksbury, {Joshua Jordan} and Nabhan, {Gary P} and Donald Norman and Humberto Suz{\'a}n and John Tuxill and Jim Donovan",
year = "1999",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97399.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "98--107",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In situ conservation of wild chiles and their biotic associates

AU - Tewksbury, Joshua Jordan

AU - Nabhan, Gary P

AU - Norman, Donald

AU - Suzán, Humberto

AU - Tuxill, John

AU - Donovan, Jim

PY - 1999/2

Y1 - 1999/2

N2 - Wild congeners of domesticated crops increasingly serve as sources of genes for improving crop cultivars. Although wild congeners have been included in seed collections for ex situ storage, there has been little work to protect populations of these wild species in their natural habitats for in situ conservation. We assessed the distribution of chile plants (Capsicum annuum L. var. aviculare [Dierbach] D'Arcy and Eshbaugh) relative to the dominant woody vegetation of one subpopulation in a single drainage in southern Arizona, U.S.A. Wild chiles were not found in direct sun, and the distribution of chiles under different nurse plants could be a function of random chance, microenvironmental differences under different nurse-plant species, or nonrandom dispersal by chile consumers. To examine chile distribution, we measured the association of wild chiles with nurse-plant species and compared these associations with the available cover provided by each nurse plant. We also measured the buffering capacity of each nurse-plant species, conducted mammalian and avian food-preference experiments to determine the taxa dispersing chiles, and conducted time-budget studies of potential chile dispersal agents. Wild chiles were not randomly distributed: over 75% were under the canopies of fleshy-fruited shrubs that collectively made up less than 25% of the cover. We found limited evidence that differences in buffering capacity affected chile distribution. Food-preference experiments suggested that birds are the only effective dispersal agents, and the time budgets of three common bird species were strongly correlated with chile plant distribution. These results lend support for directed dispersal by avian consumers. The distribution of chiles appears to be a function of interactions between consumers, nurse plants, and the secondary chemicals in the chiles themselves. Only through studies of in situ populations can we understand the interactions that sustain both wild-crop relatives and the genetic variability essential to future crop management.

AB - Wild congeners of domesticated crops increasingly serve as sources of genes for improving crop cultivars. Although wild congeners have been included in seed collections for ex situ storage, there has been little work to protect populations of these wild species in their natural habitats for in situ conservation. We assessed the distribution of chile plants (Capsicum annuum L. var. aviculare [Dierbach] D'Arcy and Eshbaugh) relative to the dominant woody vegetation of one subpopulation in a single drainage in southern Arizona, U.S.A. Wild chiles were not found in direct sun, and the distribution of chiles under different nurse plants could be a function of random chance, microenvironmental differences under different nurse-plant species, or nonrandom dispersal by chile consumers. To examine chile distribution, we measured the association of wild chiles with nurse-plant species and compared these associations with the available cover provided by each nurse plant. We also measured the buffering capacity of each nurse-plant species, conducted mammalian and avian food-preference experiments to determine the taxa dispersing chiles, and conducted time-budget studies of potential chile dispersal agents. Wild chiles were not randomly distributed: over 75% were under the canopies of fleshy-fruited shrubs that collectively made up less than 25% of the cover. We found limited evidence that differences in buffering capacity affected chile distribution. Food-preference experiments suggested that birds are the only effective dispersal agents, and the time budgets of three common bird species were strongly correlated with chile plant distribution. These results lend support for directed dispersal by avian consumers. The distribution of chiles appears to be a function of interactions between consumers, nurse plants, and the secondary chemicals in the chiles themselves. Only through studies of in situ populations can we understand the interactions that sustain both wild-crop relatives and the genetic variability essential to future crop management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032968376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032968376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97399.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97399.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032968376

VL - 13

SP - 98

EP - 107

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 1

ER -