Independent evaluation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) clinical decision rule

Peter B. Richman, Tyler F. Vadeboncoeur, Vatsal Chikani, Lani Clark, Bentley J Bobrow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Recently, investigators described a clinical decision rule for termination of resuscitation (TOR) designed to help determine whether to terminate emergency medical services (EMS) resuscitative efforts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OOHCA). The authors sought to evaluate the hypothesis that TOR would predict no survival for patients in an independent cohort of patients with OOHCA. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted in the state of Arizona. Consecutive, adult, OOHCA were prospectively evaluated from October 2004 through October 2006. A statewide OOHCA database utilizing Utstein-style reporting from 30 different EMS systems was used. Data were abstracted from EMS first care reports and hospital discharge records. The TOR guidelines predict that no survival to hospital discharge will occur if 1) an OOHCA victim does not have return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 2) no shocks are administered, and 3) the arrest is not witnessed by EMS personnel. Data were entered into a structured database. Continuous data are presented as means (±standard deviations [SD]) and categorical data as frequency of occurrence, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as appropriate. The primary outcome measure was to determine if any cohort member who met TOR criteria survived to hospital discharge. Results: There were 2,239 eligible patients; the study group included 2,180 (97.4%) patients for whom the data were complete; mean age was 64 (±11) years, and 35% were female. The majority of patients in the study group met at least one or more of the TOR criteria. A total of 2,047 (93.8%) patients suffered from cardiac arrest that was unwitnessed by EMS; 1,653 (75.8%) had an unwitnessed arrest and no ROSC. With respect to TOR, 1,160 of 2,180 (53.2%) patients met all three criteria; only one (0.09%; 95% CI = 0% to 0.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Conclusions: The authors evaluated TOR guidelines in an independent, statewide OOHCA database. The results are consistent with the findings of the TOR investigation and suggest that this algorithm is a promising tool for TOR decision-making in the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-521
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Resuscitation Orders
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Resuscitation
Emergency Medical Services
Databases
Guidelines
Confidence Intervals
Survival
Hospital Records
Heart Arrest
Shock
Decision Making
Cohort Studies
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Clinical decision rule
  • Clinical guidelines
  • Termination of resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Independent evaluation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) clinical decision rule. / Richman, Peter B.; Vadeboncoeur, Tyler F.; Chikani, Vatsal; Clark, Lani; Bobrow, Bentley J.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 517-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Richman, Peter B. ; Vadeboncoeur, Tyler F. ; Chikani, Vatsal ; Clark, Lani ; Bobrow, Bentley J. / Independent evaluation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) clinical decision rule. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 517-521.
@article{c7133708a3b241c6961ed4401429d4a7,
title = "Independent evaluation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) clinical decision rule",
abstract = "Objectives: Recently, investigators described a clinical decision rule for termination of resuscitation (TOR) designed to help determine whether to terminate emergency medical services (EMS) resuscitative efforts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OOHCA). The authors sought to evaluate the hypothesis that TOR would predict no survival for patients in an independent cohort of patients with OOHCA. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted in the state of Arizona. Consecutive, adult, OOHCA were prospectively evaluated from October 2004 through October 2006. A statewide OOHCA database utilizing Utstein-style reporting from 30 different EMS systems was used. Data were abstracted from EMS first care reports and hospital discharge records. The TOR guidelines predict that no survival to hospital discharge will occur if 1) an OOHCA victim does not have return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 2) no shocks are administered, and 3) the arrest is not witnessed by EMS personnel. Data were entered into a structured database. Continuous data are presented as means (±standard deviations [SD]) and categorical data as frequency of occurrence, and 95{\%} confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as appropriate. The primary outcome measure was to determine if any cohort member who met TOR criteria survived to hospital discharge. Results: There were 2,239 eligible patients; the study group included 2,180 (97.4{\%}) patients for whom the data were complete; mean age was 64 (±11) years, and 35{\%} were female. The majority of patients in the study group met at least one or more of the TOR criteria. A total of 2,047 (93.8{\%}) patients suffered from cardiac arrest that was unwitnessed by EMS; 1,653 (75.8{\%}) had an unwitnessed arrest and no ROSC. With respect to TOR, 1,160 of 2,180 (53.2{\%}) patients met all three criteria; only one (0.09{\%}; 95{\%} CI = 0{\%} to 0.5{\%}) survived to hospital discharge. Conclusions: The authors evaluated TOR guidelines in an independent, statewide OOHCA database. The results are consistent with the findings of the TOR investigation and suggest that this algorithm is a promising tool for TOR decision-making in the field.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Clinical decision rule, Clinical guidelines, Termination of resuscitation",
author = "Richman, {Peter B.} and Vadeboncoeur, {Tyler F.} and Vatsal Chikani and Lani Clark and Bobrow, {Bentley J}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00110.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "517--521",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Independent evaluation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) clinical decision rule

AU - Richman, Peter B.

AU - Vadeboncoeur, Tyler F.

AU - Chikani, Vatsal

AU - Clark, Lani

AU - Bobrow, Bentley J

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Objectives: Recently, investigators described a clinical decision rule for termination of resuscitation (TOR) designed to help determine whether to terminate emergency medical services (EMS) resuscitative efforts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OOHCA). The authors sought to evaluate the hypothesis that TOR would predict no survival for patients in an independent cohort of patients with OOHCA. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted in the state of Arizona. Consecutive, adult, OOHCA were prospectively evaluated from October 2004 through October 2006. A statewide OOHCA database utilizing Utstein-style reporting from 30 different EMS systems was used. Data were abstracted from EMS first care reports and hospital discharge records. The TOR guidelines predict that no survival to hospital discharge will occur if 1) an OOHCA victim does not have return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 2) no shocks are administered, and 3) the arrest is not witnessed by EMS personnel. Data were entered into a structured database. Continuous data are presented as means (±standard deviations [SD]) and categorical data as frequency of occurrence, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as appropriate. The primary outcome measure was to determine if any cohort member who met TOR criteria survived to hospital discharge. Results: There were 2,239 eligible patients; the study group included 2,180 (97.4%) patients for whom the data were complete; mean age was 64 (±11) years, and 35% were female. The majority of patients in the study group met at least one or more of the TOR criteria. A total of 2,047 (93.8%) patients suffered from cardiac arrest that was unwitnessed by EMS; 1,653 (75.8%) had an unwitnessed arrest and no ROSC. With respect to TOR, 1,160 of 2,180 (53.2%) patients met all three criteria; only one (0.09%; 95% CI = 0% to 0.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Conclusions: The authors evaluated TOR guidelines in an independent, statewide OOHCA database. The results are consistent with the findings of the TOR investigation and suggest that this algorithm is a promising tool for TOR decision-making in the field.

AB - Objectives: Recently, investigators described a clinical decision rule for termination of resuscitation (TOR) designed to help determine whether to terminate emergency medical services (EMS) resuscitative efforts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OOHCA). The authors sought to evaluate the hypothesis that TOR would predict no survival for patients in an independent cohort of patients with OOHCA. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted in the state of Arizona. Consecutive, adult, OOHCA were prospectively evaluated from October 2004 through October 2006. A statewide OOHCA database utilizing Utstein-style reporting from 30 different EMS systems was used. Data were abstracted from EMS first care reports and hospital discharge records. The TOR guidelines predict that no survival to hospital discharge will occur if 1) an OOHCA victim does not have return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 2) no shocks are administered, and 3) the arrest is not witnessed by EMS personnel. Data were entered into a structured database. Continuous data are presented as means (±standard deviations [SD]) and categorical data as frequency of occurrence, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as appropriate. The primary outcome measure was to determine if any cohort member who met TOR criteria survived to hospital discharge. Results: There were 2,239 eligible patients; the study group included 2,180 (97.4%) patients for whom the data were complete; mean age was 64 (±11) years, and 35% were female. The majority of patients in the study group met at least one or more of the TOR criteria. A total of 2,047 (93.8%) patients suffered from cardiac arrest that was unwitnessed by EMS; 1,653 (75.8%) had an unwitnessed arrest and no ROSC. With respect to TOR, 1,160 of 2,180 (53.2%) patients met all three criteria; only one (0.09%; 95% CI = 0% to 0.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Conclusions: The authors evaluated TOR guidelines in an independent, statewide OOHCA database. The results are consistent with the findings of the TOR investigation and suggest that this algorithm is a promising tool for TOR decision-making in the field.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Clinical decision rule

KW - Clinical guidelines

KW - Termination of resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52149122739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52149122739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00110.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00110.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18616436

AN - SCOPUS:52149122739

VL - 15

SP - 517

EP - 521

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 6

ER -