Indicators of hearing protection use: Self-report and researcher observation

Stephanie C. Griffin, Richard Neitzel, William E. Daniell, Noah S. Seixas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hearing protection devices (HPD) are commonly used to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss. There is a large body of research on hearing protection use in industry, and much of it relies on workers’ self-reported use of hearing protection. Based on previous studies in fixed industry, worker self-report has been accepted as an adequate and reliable tool to measure this behavior among workers in many industrial sectors. However, recent research indicates selfreported hearing protection use may not accurately reflect subject behavior in industries with variable noise exposure. This study compares workers’ self-reported use of hearing protection with their observed use in three workplaces with two types of noise environments: one construction site and one fixed industry facility with a variable noise environment, and one fixed industry facility with a steady noise environment. Subjects reported their use of hearing protection on selfadministered surveys and activity cards, which were validated using researcher observations. The primary outcome of interest in the study was the difference between the selfreported use of hearing protection in high noise on the activity card and survey: (1) over one workday, and (2) over a 2- week period. The primary hypotheses for the study were that subjects in workplaces with variable noise environments would report their use of HPDs less accurately than subjects in the stable noise environment, and that reporting would be less accurate over 2 weeks than over 1 day. In addition to noise variability, other personal and workplace factors thought to affect the accuracy of self-reported hearing protection use were also analyzed. This study found good agreement between subjects’ self-reported HPD use and researcher observations. Workers in the steady noise environment self-reported hearing protection use more accurately on the surveys than workers in variable noise environments. The findings demonstrate the potential importance of noise exposure variability as a factor influencing reporting accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-647
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene
Volume6
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Exposure variability
  • Noise exposure assessment
  • Personal protective equipment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indicators of hearing protection use: Self-report and researcher observation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this