Individual and group decisions in the centipede game: Are groups more "rational" players?

Gary Bornstein, Tamar Kugler, Anthony Ziegelmeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two experiments compared the Centipede game played either by 2 individuals or by 2 (3-person) groups. The 2 competitors alternate in deciding whether to take the larger portion of an increasing (or constant) pile of money, and as soon as one "takes" the game ends. Assuming that both sides are concerned only with maximizing their own payoffs (and that this is common knowledge), the game theoretic solution, derived by backward induction, is for the first mover to exit the game at the first decision node. Both experiments found that although neither individuals nor groups fully complied with this solution, groups did exit the game significantly earlier than individuals. The study of experimental games has uncovered many instances in which individuals deviate systematically from the game theoretic solution. This study is in accord with other recent experiments in suggesting that game theory may provide a better description of group behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)599-605
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Individual and group decisions in the centipede game: Are groups more "rational" players?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this