Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/

Jeff Mielke, Adam Baker, Diana B Archangeli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare the complexity of idiosyncratic sound patterns involving American English /ɹ/ with the relative simplicity of clear/dark /l/-allophony patterns found in English and other lan- guages. For /ɹ/, we report an ultrasound-based articulatory study of twenty-seven speakers of American English. Two speakers use only retroflex /ɹ/, sixteen use only bunched /ɹ/, and nine use both /ɹ/ types, with idiosyncratic allophonic distributions. These allophony patterns are covert, be- cause the difference between bunched and retroflex /ɹ/ is not readily perceived by listeners. We compare this typology of /ɹ/-allophony patterns to clear/dark /l/-allophony patterns in seventeen languages. On the basis of the observed patterns, we show that individual-level /ɹ/ allophony and language-level /l/ allophony exhibit similar phonetic grounding, but that /ɹ/-allophony patterns are considerably more complex. The low complexity of language-level /l/-allophony patterns, which are more readily perceived by listeners, is argued to be the result of individual-level contact in the development of sound patterns. More generally, we argue that familiar phonological patterns (which are relatively simple and homogeneous within communities) may arise from individual- level articulatory patterns, which may be complex and speaker-specific, by a process of koineiza- tion. We conclude that two classic properties of phonological rules, phonetic naturalness and simplicity, arise from different sources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-140
Number of pages40
JournalLanguage
Volume92
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

contact
language
phonetics
listener
evidence
typology
cause
Retroflex
Allophony
community
Language
Listeners
Simplicity
Sound Patterns
American English

Keywords

  • Allophony
  • Complexity
  • Contact
  • Lateral
  • Rhotic
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity : Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/. / Mielke, Jeff; Baker, Adam; Archangeli, Diana B.

In: Language, Vol. 92, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 101-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f9a661189d648a69b923d52c9b40b52,
title = "Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/",
abstract = "We compare the complexity of idiosyncratic sound patterns involving American English /ɹ/ with the relative simplicity of clear/dark /l/-allophony patterns found in English and other lan- guages. For /ɹ/, we report an ultrasound-based articulatory study of twenty-seven speakers of American English. Two speakers use only retroflex /ɹ/, sixteen use only bunched /ɹ/, and nine use both /ɹ/ types, with idiosyncratic allophonic distributions. These allophony patterns are covert, be- cause the difference between bunched and retroflex /ɹ/ is not readily perceived by listeners. We compare this typology of /ɹ/-allophony patterns to clear/dark /l/-allophony patterns in seventeen languages. On the basis of the observed patterns, we show that individual-level /ɹ/ allophony and language-level /l/ allophony exhibit similar phonetic grounding, but that /ɹ/-allophony patterns are considerably more complex. The low complexity of language-level /l/-allophony patterns, which are more readily perceived by listeners, is argued to be the result of individual-level contact in the development of sound patterns. More generally, we argue that familiar phonological patterns (which are relatively simple and homogeneous within communities) may arise from individual- level articulatory patterns, which may be complex and speaker-specific, by a process of koineiza- tion. We conclude that two classic properties of phonological rules, phonetic naturalness and simplicity, arise from different sources.",
keywords = "Allophony, Complexity, Contact, Lateral, Rhotic, Ultrasound",
author = "Jeff Mielke and Adam Baker and Archangeli, {Diana B}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "101--140",
journal = "Language",
issn = "0097-8507",
publisher = "Linguistic Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity

T2 - Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/

AU - Mielke, Jeff

AU - Baker, Adam

AU - Archangeli, Diana B

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - We compare the complexity of idiosyncratic sound patterns involving American English /ɹ/ with the relative simplicity of clear/dark /l/-allophony patterns found in English and other lan- guages. For /ɹ/, we report an ultrasound-based articulatory study of twenty-seven speakers of American English. Two speakers use only retroflex /ɹ/, sixteen use only bunched /ɹ/, and nine use both /ɹ/ types, with idiosyncratic allophonic distributions. These allophony patterns are covert, be- cause the difference between bunched and retroflex /ɹ/ is not readily perceived by listeners. We compare this typology of /ɹ/-allophony patterns to clear/dark /l/-allophony patterns in seventeen languages. On the basis of the observed patterns, we show that individual-level /ɹ/ allophony and language-level /l/ allophony exhibit similar phonetic grounding, but that /ɹ/-allophony patterns are considerably more complex. The low complexity of language-level /l/-allophony patterns, which are more readily perceived by listeners, is argued to be the result of individual-level contact in the development of sound patterns. More generally, we argue that familiar phonological patterns (which are relatively simple and homogeneous within communities) may arise from individual- level articulatory patterns, which may be complex and speaker-specific, by a process of koineiza- tion. We conclude that two classic properties of phonological rules, phonetic naturalness and simplicity, arise from different sources.

AB - We compare the complexity of idiosyncratic sound patterns involving American English /ɹ/ with the relative simplicity of clear/dark /l/-allophony patterns found in English and other lan- guages. For /ɹ/, we report an ultrasound-based articulatory study of twenty-seven speakers of American English. Two speakers use only retroflex /ɹ/, sixteen use only bunched /ɹ/, and nine use both /ɹ/ types, with idiosyncratic allophonic distributions. These allophony patterns are covert, be- cause the difference between bunched and retroflex /ɹ/ is not readily perceived by listeners. We compare this typology of /ɹ/-allophony patterns to clear/dark /l/-allophony patterns in seventeen languages. On the basis of the observed patterns, we show that individual-level /ɹ/ allophony and language-level /l/ allophony exhibit similar phonetic grounding, but that /ɹ/-allophony patterns are considerably more complex. The low complexity of language-level /l/-allophony patterns, which are more readily perceived by listeners, is argued to be the result of individual-level contact in the development of sound patterns. More generally, we argue that familiar phonological patterns (which are relatively simple and homogeneous within communities) may arise from individual- level articulatory patterns, which may be complex and speaker-specific, by a process of koineiza- tion. We conclude that two classic properties of phonological rules, phonetic naturalness and simplicity, arise from different sources.

KW - Allophony

KW - Complexity

KW - Contact

KW - Lateral

KW - Rhotic

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962374061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962374061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962374061

VL - 92

SP - 101

EP - 140

JO - Language

JF - Language

SN - 0097-8507

IS - 1

ER -