Influence of enhanced visualization processing (EVP) of chest images on workflow

Elizabeth A Krupinski, M. Radvany, A. Levy, D. Ballenger, J. Tucker, A. Chacko, R. VanMetter

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal was to determine the influence of processing radiographic images with an Enhanced Visualization Processing (EVP) method on workflow in a PACS environment. Portable CR chest images were obtained and processed with either a Fuji CR unit (no EVP) or with a Kodak CR unit (EVP). A security camera with VCR for recording was positioned above the workstation. Four radiologists reviewed the images during their normal work schedule. The current diagnostic image was used to determine if the case was EVP or non-EVP. Only cases with 3 images were used in the analysis. The videotapes of the sessions were reviewed to determine diagnostic viewing times and whether zoom and/or window/level was used. Viewing time was significantly longer for the non-EVP than the EVP cases. The difference occurred with all readers, but was highest for reader 1. Window/level was used on 35% of the EVP and 41% of the non-EVP images. The difference was not significant. Zoom was used on 64% of the EVP and 69% of the non-EVP images. EVP processing of chest images displayed on PACS monitors significantly improves workflow and viewing time. It decreases (although not significantly) use of window/level, but not use of zooming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
EditorsE.A. Krupinski, D.P. Chakraborty
Pages77-81
Number of pages5
Volume4324
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
EventMedical Imaging 2001: Image Perception and Performance - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Feb 21 2001Feb 22 2001

Other

OtherMedical Imaging 2001: Image Perception and Performance
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period2/21/012/22/01

Fingerprint

chest
Visualization
Processing
image processing
Picture archiving and communication systems
Image processing
readers
Videocassette recorders
workstations
schedules
monitors
recording
cameras
Cameras

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Krupinski, E. A., Radvany, M., Levy, A., Ballenger, D., Tucker, J., Chacko, A., & VanMetter, R. (2001). Influence of enhanced visualization processing (EVP) of chest images on workflow. In E. A. Krupinski, & D. P. Chakraborty (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering (Vol. 4324, pp. 77-81) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431175

Influence of enhanced visualization processing (EVP) of chest images on workflow. / Krupinski, Elizabeth A; Radvany, M.; Levy, A.; Ballenger, D.; Tucker, J.; Chacko, A.; VanMetter, R.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. ed. / E.A. Krupinski; D.P. Chakraborty. Vol. 4324 2001. p. 77-81.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Krupinski, EA, Radvany, M, Levy, A, Ballenger, D, Tucker, J, Chacko, A & VanMetter, R 2001, Influence of enhanced visualization processing (EVP) of chest images on workflow. in EA Krupinski & DP Chakraborty (eds), Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. vol. 4324, pp. 77-81, Medical Imaging 2001: Image Perception and Performance, San Diego, CA, United States, 2/21/01. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431175
Krupinski EA, Radvany M, Levy A, Ballenger D, Tucker J, Chacko A et al. Influence of enhanced visualization processing (EVP) of chest images on workflow. In Krupinski EA, Chakraborty DP, editors, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 4324. 2001. p. 77-81 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431175
Krupinski, Elizabeth A ; Radvany, M. ; Levy, A. ; Ballenger, D. ; Tucker, J. ; Chacko, A. ; VanMetter, R. / Influence of enhanced visualization processing (EVP) of chest images on workflow. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. editor / E.A. Krupinski ; D.P. Chakraborty. Vol. 4324 2001. pp. 77-81
@inproceedings{b033594231e8488fab7b8ea9811ce246,
title = "Influence of enhanced visualization processing (EVP) of chest images on workflow",
abstract = "The goal was to determine the influence of processing radiographic images with an Enhanced Visualization Processing (EVP) method on workflow in a PACS environment. Portable CR chest images were obtained and processed with either a Fuji CR unit (no EVP) or with a Kodak CR unit (EVP). A security camera with VCR for recording was positioned above the workstation. Four radiologists reviewed the images during their normal work schedule. The current diagnostic image was used to determine if the case was EVP or non-EVP. Only cases with 3 images were used in the analysis. The videotapes of the sessions were reviewed to determine diagnostic viewing times and whether zoom and/or window/level was used. Viewing time was significantly longer for the non-EVP than the EVP cases. The difference occurred with all readers, but was highest for reader 1. Window/level was used on 35{\%} of the EVP and 41{\%} of the non-EVP images. The difference was not significant. Zoom was used on 64{\%} of the EVP and 69{\%} of the non-EVP images. EVP processing of chest images displayed on PACS monitors significantly improves workflow and viewing time. It decreases (although not significantly) use of window/level, but not use of zooming.",
author = "Krupinski, {Elizabeth A} and M. Radvany and A. Levy and D. Ballenger and J. Tucker and A. Chacko and R. VanMetter",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1117/12.431175",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4324",
pages = "77--81",
editor = "E.A. Krupinski and D.P. Chakraborty",
booktitle = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Influence of enhanced visualization processing (EVP) of chest images on workflow

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

AU - Radvany, M.

AU - Levy, A.

AU - Ballenger, D.

AU - Tucker, J.

AU - Chacko, A.

AU - VanMetter, R.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The goal was to determine the influence of processing radiographic images with an Enhanced Visualization Processing (EVP) method on workflow in a PACS environment. Portable CR chest images were obtained and processed with either a Fuji CR unit (no EVP) or with a Kodak CR unit (EVP). A security camera with VCR for recording was positioned above the workstation. Four radiologists reviewed the images during their normal work schedule. The current diagnostic image was used to determine if the case was EVP or non-EVP. Only cases with 3 images were used in the analysis. The videotapes of the sessions were reviewed to determine diagnostic viewing times and whether zoom and/or window/level was used. Viewing time was significantly longer for the non-EVP than the EVP cases. The difference occurred with all readers, but was highest for reader 1. Window/level was used on 35% of the EVP and 41% of the non-EVP images. The difference was not significant. Zoom was used on 64% of the EVP and 69% of the non-EVP images. EVP processing of chest images displayed on PACS monitors significantly improves workflow and viewing time. It decreases (although not significantly) use of window/level, but not use of zooming.

AB - The goal was to determine the influence of processing radiographic images with an Enhanced Visualization Processing (EVP) method on workflow in a PACS environment. Portable CR chest images were obtained and processed with either a Fuji CR unit (no EVP) or with a Kodak CR unit (EVP). A security camera with VCR for recording was positioned above the workstation. Four radiologists reviewed the images during their normal work schedule. The current diagnostic image was used to determine if the case was EVP or non-EVP. Only cases with 3 images were used in the analysis. The videotapes of the sessions were reviewed to determine diagnostic viewing times and whether zoom and/or window/level was used. Viewing time was significantly longer for the non-EVP than the EVP cases. The difference occurred with all readers, but was highest for reader 1. Window/level was used on 35% of the EVP and 41% of the non-EVP images. The difference was not significant. Zoom was used on 64% of the EVP and 69% of the non-EVP images. EVP processing of chest images displayed on PACS monitors significantly improves workflow and viewing time. It decreases (although not significantly) use of window/level, but not use of zooming.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034868037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034868037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.431175

DO - 10.1117/12.431175

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 4324

SP - 77

EP - 81

BT - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

A2 - Krupinski, E.A.

A2 - Chakraborty, D.P.

ER -